Roger Ailes
- Thread starter Clinton Scott
- Start date
The more every argument you make is refuted and shown to be false, and make no mistake, all or nearly all of them have been, the more you resort to name calling.
Sometimes it hurts when you lose, but you shouldn't continue asking the guy standing over you to keep kicking your face. At some point, like now, it just gets grotesque.
Whatever. I believe you're all wrong and I'm sticking by my stance. Besides, I'm not the sexual predator here - that's your boys trump and Ailes.
No they haven't you haven't refuted shit and you know it. You're just pissed cuz I can bring the facts back in your face and you hate it lol
When are you going to start "bringing the facts". You are, in all seriousness, one of the least intelligent people I've ever encountered on any message board.
You got me! I rarely agree with syskatine, but I believe him to be intelligent. You, not so much.
Wait. You said you're a conservative. Right?
What are my beliefs that you disagree with, I mean other than the fact that oil companies are generally amongst the largest taxpayers in the nation? And abortion.
What are some of your fiscally conservative beliefs? Just throw out a half dozen examples or so.
Just must be really bent about the massive deficits under our current President, right?
LOL mmmkay... You can't stand a smart conservative with a libertarian bent so you take your ball and go home...
This is exactly what you did with Clayton that night in Tulsa. All the big talk and then when it's time to perform you turn in to Ariel.
You don't have a clue what happened that night man. And you don't know what happened afterwards either.
Well, whatever man it was 7 years ago. If Clayton wants you to believe that then that's fine. FYI he unfriended me in Facebook last night because he doesn't like my political beliefs.
Heck, I was getting live updates. I think Jeff J was too.
I guarantee you he didn't unfriend you because of your political beliefs. Can you think of any other reason?
Or maybe it's because you're a douchebag.
I don't care why he did, political or otherwise. Believe what you want, you obviously do anyways...
Hahaha! You and your sister syskatine are the only two that have referenced me being an OU fan on a political board. That's telling. But in your defense, your performance on the OU board has always been spectacularly retarded as well.
This thread is 4 pages and I have yet to hear a good reason why I'm supposed to be upset if Roger Aires is trying to bump ugliest with the on-air talent.
Which is par for the course and accomplishes nothing for him....Greta Van Susteren telling me she was never harassed by Ailes - he wasn't trying to bang her ugly mug.
Oh, I didn't hear her response. I was referring to the Five and then Brett Baer (sp).
There are plenty of better looking women, around the same age as Gretchen Carlson who are MUCH better looking that have come to Ailes' defense. But, again, what does Ailes potentially being a lecherous boss have to do with anything? Bill Clinton got a blowjob, from an intern, in the Oval Office.
Ailes' may be a lecherous jerk; it wouldn't surprise me really. But, Carlson's story doesn't pass the smell test at all.
Back in the day before all the sexual harassment laws and lawsuits the casting couch had to be replaced regularly because of wear.
I just can't see an intelligent person worth 10's of millions being foolish enough in this day and age to risk everything on getting some action.
It seems very obvious that if you are filthy rich or are a powerful person of influence you are not going to have issues finding a sex partner(s) no matter how unattractive you are.
I just can't see an intelligent person worth 10's of millions being foolish enough in this day and age to risk everything on getting some action.
It seems very obvious that if you are filthy rich or are a powerful person of influence you are not going to have issues finding a sex partner(s) no matter how unattractive you are.
Riiiiiiigggghhhhhtttt...that's why the Murdochs have had to hire Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison to investigate Fox News, because her and several women's claims are just BS....mmhmm...sounds legit.
Riiiiiiigggghhhhhtttt...that's why the Murdochs have had to hire Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison to investigate Fox News, because her and several women's claims are just BS....mmhmm...sounds legit.
- Of course they are going to investigate it
- I only mentioned Carlson's claims. I don't know enough about the other women's claims.
- Have you looked in to Carlson's claims passed the headlines? I say no. The reason I say no, is if you HAD looked past the headlines, you'd know that NONE of the other women who have come forward were from Ailes' time at Fox News as you have previously claimed. ALL of their claims are over 25 years old.
