Nah...Not surprising. I wouldn’t have expected a railway to teach you that.
N scale, or HO, Z or 0.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah...Not surprising. I wouldn’t have expected a railway to teach you that.
Confusion abounds. You refuse to stop proving my points. It's well established my getting through to you is well beyond my reach. I have bad news. You're no 07pilt.Very poorly worded question, presumably you are asking for the sum of zed, five and ten. But smallest implies you might be thinking of unit as well. I'll go with 15 yactometers.
yeahNow you have.
How about classical mechanics?
5 + 10 = 15. 2 lowest hard metric numbers.Seems to me that the total of the three lowest hard metric numbers would be 15.
For you. Not for genius Geena Davis or soonerinlOUisiana. The question is excruciatingly simple.Its still a poorly worded question.
5 + 10 = 15. 2 lowest hard metric numbers.
5 + 10 + 15 = 30. 3 lowest hard metric numbers.
Zero is not a number. 5, 10 and 15 are the lowest.So zero is not a number? 0 + 5 + 10 = 15
Based on your previous definition of hard metric numbers, zero would be the lowest.
I'm not sure Geena Davis would agree with that.Zero is not a number.
Incorrect. Zero is considered a hard number in the domain of 3.5 + 10 = 15. 2 lowest hard metric numbers.
5 + 10 + 15 = 30. 3 lowest hard metric numbers.
Incorrect.Zero is not a number. 5, 10 and 15 are the lowest.
Philadelphia Police and Fire Unions endorsed a Republican for president for the first time. The Boston Globe endorsed Trump. A Philly newspaper endorsed Trump.
Add AZ and IA to OH in the bank for Trump. Almost surely FL. NH looks stronger for a flip.
If Trump loses PA, it's over. I don't see a path to 270 with out Penn.
After further review, I don't think there is such a thing as hard metric numbers. There is hard metric conversion and soft metric conversion, but neither of those methods specify the numbers end in 0 or 5.
Thanks for the fix. A Philly paper endorsed Trump, but I can't remember which.
Thanks for the fix. A Philly paper endorsed Trump, but I can't remember which.
A 0 by itself means nada, zilch, nothing. Another clear demonstration how my getting through to Dave level slow is completely beyond my reach.
So, no link? Seems like maybe you are just making stuff up.
Still a number.A 0 by itself means nada, zilch, nothing. Another clear demonstration how my getting through to Dave level slow is completely beyond my reach.
Hard numbers, as I recall, are the nearest measurable value in a given value domain. With a resolution of 3 the measurable values are [0, 5, 10]. With a resolution of 6, you would have [0,2,4,6,8,10] and so on. Of course that is very material science focused and might not have been SBIs intent, hence the critique of the question.After further review, I don't think there is such a thing as hard metric numbers. There is hard metric conversion and soft metric conversion, but neither of those methods specify the numbers end in 0 or 5.
Alpha Woke demonstrates the ability of one who would score very high on my 60 question 60 minute M test. soonerinlOUisiana once demonstrated the ability to achieve such on the old OOB board.If he provided a link there is zero evidence that you have the ability to apply what you’ve learned.
I can provide links for that if you’d like.
Oh, and just a cursory bit of research shows you are wrong on this as well.Your predictions are indeed out there and you remind us regularly. A mere 18 newspapers endorsed Trump in 2016. I make fun of no one's predictions as is your habit.
...
I'm becoming kind of giddy. Internal polling looking good in Arizona, Nevada, Ohio, North Carolina. Especially good in Florida. Pretty good in Pennsylvania. Maybe good in Wisconsin and Michigan. Worrisome for me is Nevada with Democrat controlled mail in voting.
Surprising for me is Hispanics. Hispanics love jobs and law and order. Hispanics are hard working. They just don't believe they'll get it with Jim Crow Joe and Ms. Lockupabruthuh.
Blacks see Jim Crow Joe as condescending as Hillree. Many older blacks have always been taught to vote Dimm. Blacks may not be coming around as Hispanics appear to be, although it appears Trump will get more black votes this time.
Trafelgar now picks Trump to win Michigan. Trafelgar was the only poll that picked Trump to win Michigan in 2016. Trafelgar was the closest poll in the end in 2016. Trafelgar picks Trump by 39-50 Electoral Votes.
RNC grandson reports all internal polling is improving.
RNC internal now points to 20% black vote for Trump. Zogby says even higher. Overlooked is 2016's blacks who didn't vote or voted down ticket. We could see a repeat with old blacks who were taught to always vote Dimm.
Keep the info coming. Fascinating. Wrong. But fascinating.
Internals now show AZ McSally leading. Trump lead strengthening.
Trump wins AZ. McSally is hard to pick. RNC internal polling is all over the place. Today looks okay for McSally but who knows tomorrow.
Philadelphia Police and Fire Unions endorsed a Republican for president for the first time. The Boston Globe endorsed Trump. A Philly newspaper endorsed Trump.
I'm really getting good reports but I'm almost too afraid to stick my neck out. Too much just seems too good to be true.
WI, MI looks good. Worrisome is NV and PA. Dimms controll mail in.
.....without thousands of fraudulent votes being cast. FIFY.There is no avenue for a Biden win.
.....without thousands of fraudulent votes being cast. FIFY.
So... how's it going, Sun? David said your stuff was wrong. He sure was criticized for it.
Can you put that considerable IQ to work and let us know how these optimistic projections worked?