If you had a son that was slandered 35 years after high school/college would you support the nomination?
You are so full of crap your eyes are brown.
Renate Alumnius
- Thread starter CowboyUp
- Start date
You are so full of crap your eyes are brown.
If only he were a Kennedy, then he could have been considered for president.
"Dong—it didn’t happen with Neal Gorsuch—same prep school as Kavanaugh.
Care to revise that statement?"
No, I wouldn't.
"Do you believe Kavanaugh is a virgin after what he posted in his yearbook? Ramirez said she was a virgin when Kavanaugh stuck his tool in her face and she had to touch it to get it out of her face."
"I believe your reply on her claiming to be a virgin was one word: “bullshit.”"
Kavanaugh's virginity status is irrelevant.
I don't recall saying bullshit to that woman's claim she was a virgin.
"How did you deduce that Kavanaugh—having published his sex conquest in a yearbook—was a virgin but she was not?
Explain, please."
I don't deduce anything. See above reply.
Or a Clinton...
@CowboyUp, you voted for the woman who terrorized Bill Clinton's rape victims when they came forward. What does that say about you? And you're actually whining about some yearbook entry?
Yes I would be glad my daughter could be of service to her country.
Is her dad a senator? Otherwise not sure how it’s relevant.
I mean I’m a dad with daughters but in the 80’s I was a high school kid banging other guys’ daughters. None of whom considered themselves victims when I ran into them at my 30 year reunion last week. It’s almost as if we’ve all become grownups with families and careers and aren’t the same dumb teenagers we were back then.
This is a weird puritanical strategy. But what’s weirder is it’s delivered with absolute sincerity that we must care about a 50 something year old man’s possible high school Shenannigans.
I don’t. At all. And still wouldn’t If he or she were an Obama appointee.
And that’s all I’ve got to say about that.
I find it amazing that she wasn't outed for 35 years even with her name in the yearbook. It wasn't until Dems went into ultra Dig-Dug mode to find anything that even resembled dirt that this poor girl's name was drug into this mess. And yet you blame Kav for it? It takes a lib to follow that kind of pretzel logic.
Got a link for that “terrorist” accusation? Where were the charges filed? There’s no statute of limitation for terrorism. Produce the police report/indictment where Hillary Clinton committed terrorism.
Her opponent bragged to grab women by the pussy—a felony.
She terrorized Bill's victims. The attempt to not answer for your support of a woman who terrorized her husband's victims is cute, but beyond retarded. Terrorism, like with a cloth?
Why did you support the woman who terrorized Bill's victims?
your not very good at keeping the family secret it seems. Glad you had a good ride with your mom, though.
Last edited:
Terrorism—federal crime—penalty: death.
Where/when were the terrorism charges filed against Hillary Rodham Clinton?
Next time you see a woman walking down the street—grab her by the pussy.
See what happens...
Dodging yet again. Since you're going to try to play extremely stupid to try to avoid answering the question...
ter·ror·ize
ˈterəˌrīz/
verb
- create and maintain a state of extreme fear and distress in (someone); fill with terror.
According to CuP, we must always believe the woman.
Your refusal to answer the question is very telling. You only give a shit about "victims" if it benefits your political team. What a coward.
Zing...I guess?
Currently, my mother is the advanced stages of Parkinson’s disease. She’s still alive, but barely. Her legs don’t work anymore. Her arms and hands are drawn into her chest.
Most of the time, she’s not conscious. But the last time I saw her, she was able to mumble that she loved me.
So, thanks for the laugh.
According to CuP, we must always believe the woman.
C Cup... what is your answer here?
He only feels bad if it is someone that can advance his party.
His outrage is purely situational and reserved for those things that he thinks politically expedient.
Let me refresh your memory. Keep in mind you vigorously supported Hilliary and you're now acting hot and bothered over a high school yearbook...
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jan/14/hillary-clinton-haunted-by-efforts-to-destroy-bill/
So are we gonna call Renate to testify under oath whether or not she slept with these football players in high school, that way you could catch whether he fibbed in his yearbook with false bravado or if he fibbed in his questioning about his post-HS virginity status. Is that what you want here?
Yearbook dirt? How f'ing desperate do you have to be to try and besmirch someone with an f'ing high school yearbook. What next? You going to get some "victim" to say that Brett Kavanaugh played doctor with her in kindergarten against her will?
Lefties are so f'ing pathetic.
Antifa doesn't like Ted Cruz's politics so they've threatened him and his family and chased him and his wife out of restaurant. You won't hear a word out of up or his ilk about how f'd up these losers are. If some conservative starts chasing liberals out of restaurants they need to be beat until they crap themselves. It is all such BS.
Lefties are so f'ing pathetic.
Antifa doesn't like Ted Cruz's politics so they've threatened him and his family and chased him and his wife out of restaurant. You won't hear a word out of up or his ilk about how f'd up these losers are. If some conservative starts chasing liberals out of restaurants they need to be beat until they crap themselves. It is all such BS.
Why would a guy banging playboy playmates and porn stars left and right every need to grab someone's pussy that he saw walking down the street?
Good God. The man has plenty for you to legitimately try to criticize, but the quality and quantity of willing and eager women he can grab by whatever he wants isn't anything you can relate to, but I would hope you've been in positions in your life where you knew it was OK to grab a woman by the pussy without thinking you were committing a felony.
If not, that might explain a lot I guess.
The point you have completely missed is that I was using the same presumption of guilt that @CowboyUp was using. Get it yet?
And this? You trying to say this is an apples to apples comparison? This is just stupid.
