ADVERTISEMENT

Paul Pelosi Violently Attacked In Their San Fransico Home

I fully agree. So will you support more funding and allotment of resources to ensure such protection for him, other representatives, and their families?

btw, what are your thoughts about the early reports (if true) of this guy's obsession with the pedophile/groomer conspiracy?
Sure but I do not support paying more in taxes, they can take if from some of their pork filled bills.
From what has been reported so far the guy should have been in the nut house, not running around on the streets. Maybe with this incident Democrats will start looking into the mental health issues or maybe they can call to ban hammers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OUSOONER67
The Speaker of the House is not granted Secret Service Protection.
But the Speaker of the House is provided security protection from Capitol Police and other law enforcement agencies. Unfortunately, this is not provided on a routine basis to the Speaker's family.

This should be immediately fixed. We need more funding and resources allotted to the security protection of our representatives (regardless of party) and their families. The President should also provide SSP protection to the Speaker of the House, his/her family, and seriously consider extending it to other Congressional leaders and their families.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
You have no clue about what my personal experiences are.

Anyone who would make the comment you made has some serious issues.
I admit to knowing nothing of your personal experience. You give off all the signals of being weak. Anyone that fails at bible thumping is weak. A back office low level lawyer now. My issues motivated me to not take your path.
 
A Crazy Canadian, I was thinking it might have been someone from Dominion wanting more money unless He had Hillary clean up the loose ends
 
  • Like
Reactions: LAY THE WOODY
But the Speaker of the House is provided security protection from Capitol Police and other law enforcement agencies. Unfortunately, this is not provided on a routine basis to the Speaker's family.

This should be immediately fixed. We need more funding and resources allotted to the security protection of our representatives (regardless of party) and their families. The President should also provide SSP protection to the Speaker of the House, his/her family, and seriously consider extending it to other Congressional leaders and their families.
Pass a plate.
 
But the Speaker of the House is provided security protection from Capitol Police and other law enforcement agencies. Unfortunately, this is not provided on a routine basis to the Speaker's family.

This should be immediately fixed. We need more funding and resources allotted to the security protection of our representatives (regardless of party) and their families. The President should also provide SSP protection to the Speaker of the House, his/her family, and seriously consider extending it to other Congressional leaders and their families.
Capital Police are limited to the Capital buildings and adjoining premises. They are not personal security details out of their designated jurisdictions. Pelosi has been granted traveling security through executive order by Biden.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
Sure but I do not support paying more in taxes
No one is claiming you would have to pay more in taxes.

From what has been reported so far the guy should have been in the nut house, not running around on the streets. Maybe with this incident Democrats will start looking into the mental health issues or maybe they can call to ban hammers.
lol, there it is, the mental health deflection.

I agree though about mental health, but this goes deeper than mental health. This guy, if reports are true, was pushing the same right-wing conspiracy nonsense/hate that some posters on this board routinely post. Do these posters, who you often agree with, belong in the nut house too?

How often do you get fixated on the pedophile/groomer conspiracy on this board? Groomer schools? Calling everyone you disagree with politically a groomer?
 
Anyone that fails at bible thumping is weak. A back office low level lawyer now.
Again, I've never made any of these claims about myself. This is the delusional caricature you have created in your mind about me because you disagree with my political viewpoints.
 
No one is claiming you would have to pay more in taxes.


lol, there it is, the mental health deflection.

I agree though about mental health, but this goes deeper than mental health. This guy, if reports are true, was pushing the same right-wing conspiracy nonsense/hate that some posters on this board routinely post. Do these posters, who you often agree with, belong in the nut house too?

How often do you get fixated on the pedophile/groomer conspiracy on this board? Groomer schools? Calling everyone you disagree with politically a groomer?
Would you be comfortable with Joe messaging yer daughter while sniffing her hair?
 
  • Like
Reactions: colcord
No one is claiming you would have to pay more in taxes.


lol, there it is, the mental health deflection.

I agree though about mental health, but this goes deeper than mental health. This guy, if reports are true, was pushing the same right-wing conspiracy nonsense/hate that some posters on this board routinely post. Do these posters, who you often agree with, belong in the nut house too?

How often do you get fixated on the pedophile/groomer conspiracy on this board? Groomer schools? Calling everyone you disagree with politically a groomer?
You don't think they guy was nuts? Says quite a bit about you if you don't. From some of the reports from people that knew him they thought he should have been locked up.
No but groomers need to be locked up IMO. Anyone that thinks sexualizing children is right, needs to be locked up.
 
Capital Police are limited to the Capital buildings and adjoining premises. They are not personal security details out of their designated jurisdictions. Pelosi has been granted traveling security through executive order by Biden.
Yes, I understand this.

Still, I believe the actions I referenced regarding security should be enacted.
 
You don't think they guy was nuts?
Did I not post that he sounds like a Q nut?

One problem though is that this Q insanity is starting to be embraced more and more by Republicans. It can be easily found at a Trump rally, for example. You even get fixated on it and apparently, embrace some of the insanity. Running around calling people you disagree with politically "groomers," asserting that our President is a pedophile, obsessed with groomer schools, agreeing with the vaccine nonsense, talking about how the 2020 election was stolen/rigged, thinking the Democrats want to do the same in the midterm, etc.

So, do you belong in the nuthouse too?
 
Last edited:
Did I not post that he sounds like a Q nut?

One problem though is that this Q insanity is starting to be embraced more and more by Republicans. It can be easily found at a Trump rally, for example. You even get fixated on it and apparently, embrace some of the insanity. Running around calling people you disagree with politically "groomers," asserting that our President is a pedophile, obsessed with groomer schools, agreeing with the vaccine nonsense, talking about how the 2020 election was stolen/rigged, thinking the Democrats want to do the same in the midterm, etc.

So, do you belong in the nuthouse too?
The only people I call groomers are people that are attempting to groom children or those that defend those that are attempting to groom children. It's real easy not to be a groomer, don't talk about sexual topics with young children and don't defend those that do. In other words leave the kids alone and you won't have any problems.
As to Biden, if you can watch some of those videos and you don't have an issue with his actions, you have a problem.
 
The only people I call groomers are people that are attempting to groom children or those that defend those that are attempting to groom children. It's real easy not to be a groomer, don't talk about sexual topics with young children and don't defend those that do. In other words leave the kids alone and you won't have any problems.
As to Biden, if you can watch some of those videos and you don't have an issue with his actions, you have a problem.
Joe's no better than a Catholic priest. Or is it the other way around?
 
  • Like
Reactions: colcord
She actually does have a protection detail.
I stated elsewhere that she was granted SSP by executive order from Biden. She (any Speaker of the House) is not granted SSP by political appointment.
  • The president
  • The vice president
  • The president-elect
  • The vice president-elect
  • Former presidents
  • The spouses of former presidents, unless they marry someone else
  • Children of former presidents until age 16
  • Visiting foreign heads of state or government and their spouses traveling with them in the U.S., and other “distinguished foreign visitors” to the U.S.
  • Major presidential and vice presidential candidates and their spouses within 120 days of a presidential election
  • Individuals protected by executive order
  • “National Special Security Events”
 
Any chance you and yours tone down the nasty rhetoric in this thread? I say nope…yall will double down on it.
CDS, do you ever ask yourself this?
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇🤣🤣
200.gif
 
I stated elsewhere that she was granted SSP by executive order from Biden. She (any Speaker of the House) is not granted SSP by political appointment.
  • The president
  • The vice president
  • The president-elect
  • The vice president-elect
  • Former presidents
  • The spouses of former presidents, unless they marry someone else
  • Children of former presidents until age 16
  • Visiting foreign heads of state or government and their spouses traveling with them in the U.S., and other “distinguished foreign visitors” to the U.S.
  • Major presidential and vice presidential candidates and their spouses within 120 days of a presidential election
  • Individuals protected by executive order
  • “National Special Security Events”
Brother you just learned some folks.
 
The only people I call groomers are people that are attempting to groom children or those that defend those that are attempting to groom children. It's real easy not to be a groomer, don't talk about sexual topics with young children and don't defend those that do. In other words leave the kids alone and you won't have any problems.
As to Biden, if you can watch some of those videos and you don't have an issue with his actions, you have a problem.
As I already stated, this Q insanity is starting to be embraced more and more by Republicans. Your posts perfectly illustrate this, as do your lousy attempts at defending this insanity.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 22LR
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT