See, there's a difference between firearm deaths and firearm homicide. Deaths (your first representation) are actually over 30k per year. Homicides are around 12 k. You've commented on the distinction, you're aware of it. You represented the larger sample but presented data from a smaller one. thats not being a dumbass though - just dishonest. Please provide the deaths by rifle as you represented - not homicides. Or change your post. If you delete your post I'll consider letting it go.
The real dumbass move is making the point to begin with, your usual slanted, intellectually dishonest method aside. (Found that electrician to straighten out global warming yet?) So? What fraction of diphtheria deaths would it be? Or folding chair accidents? Or were you just clumsily trying to minimize rifle deaths as opposed to the vast majority of gun OR homicide- related gun deaths? Yes. And you needed to both really nitpick AND deceive to do it. This is what happens when I spend the time to actually read your baloney, you little chickenshit -- an honest, above board debate is frustrated because you lie and spin so damn much. I'll bet your ambulance records are like reading a Philip C. Dick novel.
There's a Golden Hurricane sports info site with a free section. Have you tried that one?
