Got a link to the police confirming "this was a hate filled attack on the press?"The police have confirmed that this was a hate filled attack on the press.
Got a link to the police confirming "this was a hate filled attack on the press?"
Everything I've read so far indicates the shooter has quite a history with the paper, especially its executives. Apparently had filed a defamation lawsuit in 2012 that was dismissed. Lots of angry email, letters, etc.
Got a link to the police confirming "this was a hate filled attack on the press?"
Everything I've read so far indicates the shooter has quite a history with the paper, especially its executives. Apparently had filed a defamation lawsuit in 2012 that was dismissed. Lots of angry email, letters, etc.
Sure, I guess, but a random "hate filled attack" on the "press" is actually quite different than a premeditated attack on a single newspaper by someone who has a history with it. One fits the claim of the OP. The other does not.Technically a correct statement.
His family crest.
Posted by him
![]()
Got a link to the police confirming "this was a hate filled attack on the press?"
Everything I've read so far indicates the shooter has quite a history with the paper, especially its executives. Apparently had filed a defamation lawsuit in 2012 that was dismissed. Lots of angry email, letters, etc.
Well, that did it. I guess nothing to it if he had a coat of arms. Just to pile on to effin' morons that circulated all this, he liked Colgate toothpaste too. I had no idea.
I'm sorry guys, I'll research this stuff more thoroughly next time.
Aaaaand then this. Reports are circulating it was a loving attack, not a hateful attack at all.
And who'd have thought he'd be crazy? Or mad?
Sure, I guess, but a random "hate filled attack" on the "press" is actually quite different than a premeditated attack on a single newspaper by someone who has a history with it. One
Everything I've read so far indicates the shooter has quite a history with the paper, especially its executives. Apparently had filed a defamation lawsuit in 2012 that was dismissed. Lots of angry email, letters, etc.
I know it doesn't sound as believable as the guy shooting up the place because of some conservative gay guy's text to a reporter, but that's what I've seen so far.And a motive! Aha!
Obtuse. I wonder why you're taking that approach. Weird.You didn't slip that in there to create a false narrative to attack, did you? Because there's almost no relationship between hate-motivated and premeditated. Criminal hate can be executed either impulsively or with forethought.
Harry's correct in this instance. You are wrong.
And @Ostatedchi has the most important statement in this thread.
Would need better context of the comment.
You mean before everybody kicked him to the curb for being a pedophile apologist?
Of course we can. It's absolutely a terrible and dangerous thing to say to anyone.Whether or not this guy shot up a newspaper directly because of Milo’s words, can we at least acknowledge that such talk is cancerous and dangerous and shouldn’t be done....whether he’s a MAGA guy or a progressive or whatever?
Moderation, centrism, and civility is dead and gone. Independent thought outside of tribal politics is largely gone
Sure, I guess, but a random "hate filled attack" on the "press" is actually quite different than a premeditated attack on a single newspaper by someone who has a history with it. One fits the claim of the OP. The other does not.
Who narrarared that this was a "random" crime?
You didn't slip that in there to create a false narrative to attack, did you? Because there's almost no relationship between hate-motivated and premeditated. Criminal hate can be executed either impulsively or with forethought.
I simply made a request for a link to a claim made in a post. I then described how the language in that post could easily have been used to attempt to justify what's
It has declined inversely to the rise of right wing media.
Whether or not this guy shot up a newspaper directly because of Milo’s words, can we at least acknowledge that such talk is cancerous and dangerous and shouldn’t be done....whether he’s a MAGA guy or a progressive or whatever?
It has declined inversely to the rise of right wing media.
Whether or not this guy shot up a newspaper directly because of Milo’s words, can we at least acknowledge that such talk is cancerous and dangerous and shouldn’t be done....whether he’s a MAGA guy or a progressive or whatever?
It has declined inversely to the rise of right wing media.
Hell yes!!!
That’s the point that I’ve been trying to make
And people eating quinoa.
Hell yes!!!
That’s the point that I’ve been trying to make
Glad to hear it, but...
I totally didn’t receive that as the point you were trying to make from your posts.
It appeared to me that the point you were trying to make was that because the shooting wasn’t obviously tied to or caused by Milo’s statement that what he said wasn’t really that big of a deal.
I’m glad that wasn’t the point you were making.
Biff wants to punch people, says that the media is the enemy, and now all along you've been saying people should be careful what they say, huh?
This is about you
You jumped on the false narrative like a nympho in a dick factory
You couldn’t wait to fvck
Oops, you wanted dick and got scissored instead.
aCan someone please explain to me why two media outlets published Milo Y's comments about killing journalists that he sent to them via text message?
Are they really that desperate for clicks?
Codemn this whack-nut, but praise Maxine? The left is screwy...
I doubt I would know who Milo is if it wasn’t for this message board.A good number of notable leaders on the left have condemned Maxine’s statements.
Any statements from MAGA leaders condemning Milo that you’ve seen?
Broad brushes aren’t really effective.
I doubt I would know who Milo is if it wasn’t for this message board.
Well, one is an elected congresswoman, the other is some random Brit fruit.A good number of notable leaders on the left have condemned Maxine’s statements.
Any statements from MAGA leaders condemning Milo that you’ve seen?
Broad brushes aren’t really effective.
Well, one is an elected congresswoman, the other is some random Brit fruit.
By context I meant that I would want to know if the quote was accurate and not done like you see on book jackets.