ADVERTISEMENT

"I can't wait for the vigilante squads to start gunning down journalists on sight."

The police have confirmed that this was a hate filled attack on the press.
Got a link to the police confirming "this was a hate filled attack on the press?"

Everything I've read so far indicates the shooter has quite a history with the paper, especially its executives. Apparently had filed a defamation lawsuit in 2012 that was dismissed. Lots of angry email, letters, etc.
 
Got a link to the police confirming "this was a hate filled attack on the press?"

Everything I've read so far indicates the shooter has quite a history with the paper, especially its executives. Apparently had filed a defamation lawsuit in 2012 that was dismissed. Lots of angry email, letters, etc.

Technically a correct statement.

Meant to mislead and assign blame

But technically correct.

Fvckin Pussyhats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Got a link to the police confirming "this was a hate filled attack on the press?"

Everything I've read so far indicates the shooter has quite a history with the paper, especially its executives. Apparently had filed a defamation lawsuit in 2012 that was dismissed. Lots of angry email, letters, etc.

If the info we are seeing is a closer approximation of the reality of the situation, then it sounds like premature political ejaculation by @osu_orangestreak ...essentially stoking the same embers he chastising others of doing.

Same with @syskatine

Losers or vile shitheads?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrunkenViking
Technically a correct statement.
Sure, I guess, but a random "hate filled attack" on the "press" is actually quite different than a premeditated attack on a single newspaper by someone who has a history with it. One fits the claim of the OP. The other does not.

If there are any links showing that police have confirmed what osu_orangestreak posted, I'd like to read them. It seems way too early for the police to have confirmed much of anything, let alone linking it to text messages from Milo Minneapolis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrunkenViking
His family crest.

Posted by him

Ramos_Coat_Of_Arms.jpg

Well, that did it. I guess nothing to it if he had a coat of arms. Just to pile on to effin' morons that circulated all this, he liked Colgate toothpaste too. I had no idea.

I'm sorry guys, I'll research this stuff more thoroughly next time.

Got a link to the police confirming "this was a hate filled attack on the press?"

Everything I've read so far indicates the shooter has quite a history with the paper, especially its executives. Apparently had filed a defamation lawsuit in 2012 that was dismissed. Lots of angry email, letters, etc.

Aaaaand then this. Reports are circulating it was a loving attack, not a hateful attack at all.

And who'd have thought he'd be crazy? Or mad?
 
Well, that did it. I guess nothing to it if he had a coat of arms. Just to pile on to effin' morons that circulated all this, he liked Colgate toothpaste too. I had no idea.

I'm sorry guys, I'll research this stuff more thoroughly next time.



Aaaaand then this. Reports are circulating it was a loving attack, not a hateful attack at all.

And who'd have thought he'd be crazy? Or mad?

Own it motherfvcker

Fake news bitch

You jumped on it

With glee
 
You didn't slip that in there to create a false narrative to attack, did you? Because there's almost no relationship between hate-motivated and premeditated. Criminal hate can be executed either impulsively or with forethought.

Everything I've read so far indicates the shooter has quite a history with the paper, especially its executives. Apparently had filed a defamation lawsuit in 2012 that was dismissed. Lots of angry email, letters, etc.

And a motive! Aha!
 
You didn't slip that in there to create a false narrative to attack, did you? Because there's almost no relationship between hate-motivated and premeditated. Criminal hate can be executed either impulsively or with forethought.
Obtuse. I wonder why you're taking that approach. Weird.

I simply made a request for a link to a claim made in a post. I then described how the language in that post could easily have been used to attempt to justify what's implied in the OP as compared to the reality that this shooting probably has nothing to do with what's implied in the OP. Really just a harmless interaction with another poster. Why are you so defensive? It's almost like you've been caught wearing your mother's lingerie or something.

Who created this thread anyhow? Just curious. Shirley it wasn't you. I know you're still busy researching Melania's jacket for connections to fascism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrunkenViking
Harry's correct in this instance. You are wrong.

And @Ostatedchi has the most important statement in this thread.

This one?

Would need better context of the comment.

I’m having a hard time conceiving of a context where Milo saying what he said to a journalist calling him for comment would be anything but cancerous and dangerous, especially with Presidemtial tweets calling members of the press Enemies of the State.

You mean before everybody kicked him to the curb for being a pedophile apologist?

Everyone? I don’t think so.

There is a whole thread on this site dedicated to the cancerous and dangerous behavior of sections of the left and the liberals being challenged to do something about it. Maybe it’s time to start acknowledge and address and do something about the highly similar cancerous and dangerous behavior in sections of the MAGA crowd.

I don’t know what dealing with it looks like...for either side. I’d personally hope that it a commitment to moderation, to centrism, to civility from everyone would be a good start, but that’s my heart talking. My head side honestly believes that’s a non-starter for both sides of that coin. Moderation, centrism, and civility is dead and gone. Independent thought outside of tribal politics is largely gone. And we’re all for the worse because of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Whether or not this guy shot up a newspaper directly because of Milo’s words, can we at least acknowledge that such talk is cancerous and dangerous and shouldn’t be done....whether he’s a MAGA guy or a progressive or whatever?
 
Whether or not this guy shot up a newspaper directly because of Milo’s words, can we at least acknowledge that such talk is cancerous and dangerous and shouldn’t be done....whether he’s a MAGA guy or a progressive or whatever?
Of course we can. It's absolutely a terrible and dangerous thing to say to anyone.

I don't know how much of a following Milo has, but after the Scalise shooting, everyone who is anybody in politics and political reporting/commentary needed to stop with the talk of violence. It's something nobody should accept regardless of the ideology of who said it.
 
Sure, I guess, but a random "hate filled attack" on the "press" is actually quite different than a premeditated attack on a single newspaper by someone who has a history with it. One fits the claim of the OP. The other does not.

Who narrarared that this was a "random" crime?

You didn't slip that in there to create a false narrative to attack, did you? Because there's almost no relationship between hate-motivated and premeditated. Criminal hate can be executed either impulsively or with forethought.

I simply made a request for a link to a claim made in a post. I then described how the language in that post could easily have been used to attempt to justify what's

Can you address my question regarding who narrated this was a random shooting?
 
It has declined inversely to the rise of right wing media.

Jesus

Whether or not this guy shot up a newspaper directly because of Milo’s words, can we at least acknowledge that such talk is cancerous and dangerous and shouldn’t be done....whether he’s a MAGA guy or a progressive or whatever?

Yes, that is acknowledged.
 
Whether or not this guy shot up a newspaper directly because of Milo’s words, can we at least acknowledge that such talk is cancerous and dangerous and shouldn’t be done....whether he’s a MAGA guy or a progressive or whatever?

Hell yes!!!

That’s the point that I’ve been trying to make
 
Hell yes!!!

That’s the point that I’ve been trying to make

Glad to hear it, but...

I totally didn’t receive that as the point you were trying to make from your posts.

It appeared to me that the point you were trying to make was that because the shooting wasn’t obviously tied to or caused by Milo’s statement that what he said wasn’t really that big of a deal.

I’m glad that wasn’t the point you were making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrunkenViking
Glad to hear it, but...

I totally didn’t receive that as the point you were trying to make from your posts.

It appeared to me that the point you were trying to make was that because the shooting wasn’t obviously tied to or caused by Milo’s statement that what he said wasn’t really that big of a deal.

I’m glad that wasn’t the point you were making.

I don’t give a shit about that pedo supporting POS.

Yeah, he claims he loved his ass fvcking from a priest.

Claims other children may as well

His understanding of psychology is shit
 
Biff wants to punch people, says that the media is the enemy, and now all along you've been saying people should be careful what they say, huh?

This is about you

You jumped on the false narrative like a nympho in a dick factory

You couldn’t wait to fvck

Oops, you wanted dick and got scissored instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Can someone please explain to me why two media outlets published Milo Y's comments about killing journalists that he sent to them via text message?

Are they really that desperate for clicks?
a

What mode of communication counts?

Here's some more. The violent stuff is basic conservative messaging.

 
Codemn this whack-nut, but praise Maxine? The left is screwy...

A good number of notable leaders on the left have condemned Maxine’s statements.

Any statements from MAGA leaders condemning Milo that you’ve seen?

Broad brushes aren’t really effective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
I doubt I would know who Milo is if it wasn’t for this message board.

Several JRE interviews.

Wrote for Breitbart before his whole pedophile problem.

Pretty big in the college speaking tour. In the middle of the whole ANTIFA Berkeley protests over his appearance there.

It’s not like he’s an unknown outlier in for the MAGA crowd.
 
A good number of notable leaders on the left have condemned Maxine’s statements.

Any statements from MAGA leaders condemning Milo that you’ve seen?

Broad brushes aren’t really effective.
Well, one is an elected congresswoman, the other is some random Brit fruit.
 
Well, one is an elected congresswoman, the other is some random Brit fruit.

With plenty of influence among the MAGA crowd.

But I understand why you and the MAGA crowd would want to attempt to distance yourself from the prior support and affirmation he received....without actually condemning what he said.
 
By context I meant that I would want to know if the quote was accurate and not done like you see on book jackets.

The quote on the book jacket says "This is the greatest book you'll ever read..." when the actual quote was "This is the greatest book you'll ever read, if you are an illiterate idiot."

Was his comment prefaced with, "I would never say something like..." ?

If not, what he said was horrible and indefensible. Just because he is wrong this time; doesn't mean that the other things he said in the past are now incorrect. I think the people who think what he's said in the past is correct will still agree that he's pretty much a dick. Doesn't make him wrong. Just a dick.

This current point - he's wrong and should rightfully be called out for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT