Good idea. So are you going to stop voting for Democrats then?Maybe it's time to quit cozying up to communist dictators then?





Good idea. So are you going to stop voting for Democrats then?Maybe it's time to quit cozying up to communist dictators then?
No.
Less than 100million.
hard to know who to believe when the lies flow so freely.
Lol those people would put whatever democrats sys is voting for up against the wall given the chance.Good idea. So are you going to stop voting for Democrats then?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Whew. That's good then. The inaccurate body counts from capitalist regimes were making communism look bad.No.
Less than 100million.
yeah whats 14million people amongst friends.Dumbest hill to die on you could possibly pick. What is it then? 86,000,000 or so?
Maybe it's time to quit cozying up to communist dictators then?
wildAnd yet there is video evidence of everything but the concrete.
Not reallyWhew. That's good then. The inaccurate body counts from capitalist regimes were making communism look bad.
Capitalist regimes are known for exceptional accuracy when tallying up deaths by communism.
Then why were you fretting over inflated body counts?Not really
Lol those people would put whatever democrats sys is voting for up against the wall given the chance.
got me
... and throw milkshakes at them?
fretting?Then why were you fretting over inflated body counts?
I guess I just don't have the same soft spot for these people as I do for children. Go figure.Altruism on display. What a humanitarian you are.
wild
I am glad Twitter supports freedom of speech in this case.
Are you posting from a border concentration camp?I guess I just don't have the same soft spot for these people as I do for children. Go figure.
I am glad Twitter supports freedom of speech in this case.
You get the W Mega, you really left it all on the field today.Case in point.
Lol = defeat 100% of the time.
You get the W Mega, you really left it all on the field today.
Are you for consistency or free speech?I’m sure you do. It’s kind of inconsistent when viewed by clear eyes though.
Is "bothered enough to comment on them" more accurate?fretting?
bothered?Is "bothered enough to comment on them" more accurate?
Are you for consistency or free speech?
So in this case you are against free speech. CoolBoth. Platforms should be bastions of free speech - which already contain limitations regarding inciting violence.
Just keep calling yourself "Constitution obsessed weirdo." and you are going keep seeing white flags I guess.Universal sign of capitulation. I accept your surrender.
So in this case you are against free speech. Cool
Just keep calling yourself "Constitution obsessed weirdo." and you are going keep seeing white flags I guess.
Mega, the consitutionalist, what is the test to determine if speech is sufficiently inciting to not be protected by freedom of speech?I already explained it. Pretty clearly. Twice today. Plus dozens of times in the past.
Calling for hitting people with bricks is not free speech in any context. Even so, I wouldn’t have any problem with it if it were consistently policed by Twitter, fb etc.
Mega, the consitutionalist, what is the test to determine if speech is sufficiently inciting to not be protected by freedom of speech?
cool so can we quit acting like this wasn't constitutionally protected speech?Brandenburg test.
(From link):
The test determined that the government may prohibit speech advocating the use of force or crime if the speech satisfies both elements of the two-part test:
- The speech is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” AND
- The speech is “likely to incite or produce such action.”
cool so can we quit acting like this wasn't constitutionally protected speech?
I wouldn’t have any problem with it if it were consistently policed by Twitter, fb etc.