For fun here's another one of your takes.In one thread you quote tweeted Senator Paul on his stance on the 2nd Amendment implying the shooting is justified due to the government being tyrannical, said the board had selective outrage, blamed conservative media and agenda for the divisiveness, and never condemned the violence.
And what am I missing with Scalise? Big 2nd amendment guy, isn't he? Isn't that exactly what he wanted, to preserve the ability of the common man to take up arms against his government? Kill anybody they want to? Or he's for that only until someone takes up arms against him?