I’ve never dove too deep into how they complete their rankings, but agree 100% that should be a part of the assessment. I know most of the recruiting stuff had OSU pretty highly ranked with their class a few years ago that had like 10 guys that were the same size because they were all top 100. I feel like they had to know that wouldn’t work out because half those guys would never be able to make the lineup? Naturally most of them ended up transferring. Schumacher, Blees, and Marsteller. Also it doesn’t seem like they include transfers in their consideration. OSU’s Class a few years ago was bad as far as recruits they signed so they rated them pretty low, but they also got Jacobe Smith and Geo Martinez who are pretty good and weren’t listed in any of their stuff.Before about two years ago, I take Flo's recruiting rankings with a grain of salt. IMO, prior to that time, they placed too much focus on quantity of recruits in the top 100 instead of quality. As we've seen, quality is a major component to the success that PSU and tOSU have had in recent years at nationals. So while ASU and NCST may have had 7-8 guys in the top 100, only 1-2 of those were in the top 20. Teams like PSU were getting four top 100 recruits but three of those in the top 15.