ADVERTISEMENT

Brett Kavenaugh letter details...

Yep. Unfortunately, if victims choose to wait 35 years to raise their allegations then yes, potential criminal acts will be disregarded due to an inability to verify the truth. For the record, I'd feel the same way if this were a Dem candidate.

Question though. Per this thread, she supposedly told a therapist in 2012. Isn't a therapist required to report this to law enforcement?

She didn’t name him specifically in that convo
 
Great, put her under oath today. Any other time would just be a delaying tactic.
 
This whole thing stinks to high heaven. No way this wasn’t done to keep the vote from happening. I, as a woman, am disgusted by the tactics. Also, being a woman, if I was attacked no matter when it was, 5 years ago or 36 years ago, you bet your a$$ I would remember every detail of it, even if I did get away. The fact that she is telling a different story than she told her therapist and now named Kavanaugh is nothing more than a liberal professor trying to help the Trump resistance.

Now if it ever comes out that she is telling the truth I will come back and concede I was wrong, but right now I’m calling a spade a spade.
 
So basically this is a she said he said from 35 years ago when both parties were minors? Can't see this going anywhere.

Then there's the additional motive of the women's parents losing a decision to the judges mother in a bankruptcy case?

Or is this all a leaked future plotline of As the World Turns?
 
Npr on the ground doing the work for the dnc today.

Jeff flake and bob corker falling in line with the Dems as predictable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imprimis
during her and her husbands' therapy session her husband said she said she was "scared one day he would be elected to the supreme court". This was back in 2012. Man, she was something...she should have gone straight to vegas and bet the house on any future events coming up. She could make millions.
She's a flake and will be found out...these dems don't care how bad they look.
 
Her parents having a foreclosure case that was ruled on by Kavanuagh’s mother certainly adds another layer.

Politically this is a strong move by the Dems. But dirty as hell and now this type of crap will happen more often. Feinstein should be censored.
 
Accuser is a left wing SJW who has marched against Trump including wearing a vagina hat. Interesting she recently scrubbed her social media accounts.
It's weird that she thought Paula Jones didn't have a case against Slick Willy and acted as if Franken's incident didn't count because he wasn't a senator at the time it occurred...
 
  • Like
Reactions: imprimis
On one level, gotta hand it to the left / Dems.

Unlike the constantly retreating / cowering GOP establishment and cuckservatives, the left plays to win.

Or as Saul Alinsky said, the ends justify the means. Leon Trotsky said there are no absolute rules of conduct in peace or in war.

They (Alinsky and Trotsky) are probably the two most effective leftist political strategists ever.

Even when there’s visual evidence (see below), the left doesn’t give a f*ck — if there’s a political goal to be achieved.


Related flashback — this guy is still promoted by the corporate media and political establishment as credible, and a hero:


5b9ef2be077e3.jpeg
 
Wonder if she knew about Mark Judge's book on his alcohol problems before naming him as the person who broke it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
It's a last minute attempt to scuttle the appointment hoping the dems win the Senate and can thereby thwart any nominee unless he/she/it thinks more along the lines of liberals.
 
Dumb to nominate Kavanaugh in the first place. They knew all about Kavanaugh's skeletons in the closest when they nominated him, knowing full well that nominating someone with skeletons would be the only way to **** up this layup of a SCOTUS seat. This is the DNC of Supreme Court nominations.
 
Dumb to nominate Kavanaugh in the first place. They knew all about Kavanaugh's skeletons in the closest when they nominated him, knowing full well that nominating someone with skeletons would be the only way to **** up this layup of a SCOTUS seat. This is the DNC of Supreme Court nominations.
What skeletons?
 
What skeletons?
A rape accusation. Possible perjury. Baggage from time in the W Bush Whitehouse. Whether you believe these things are true or not, there are lots of conservative judges you could nominate with none of the above, so why risk the scenario we have playing out right now?
 
Wow, the righties on this board are melting down over this. Funny too how some are just convinced she is either lying or all of this is part of some grand conspiracy by the Dems.

Maybe just sit back and reserve judgment till all the facts come out?
 
What skeletons?
A rape accusation. Possible perjury. Baggage from time in the W Bush Whitehouse. Whether you believe these things are true or not, there are lots of conservative judges you could nominate with none of the above, so why risk the scenario we have playing out right now?
Fake baggage would have been found on any conservative nominated by Trump.
 
Maybe just sit back and reserve judgment till all the facts come out?

this mueller fisa court lying fbi doj connected to dem funded dossier thing dooshed that philosophy

today

if the lady had something to say
before the eve of the vote and when dirty dianne had time on the clock in the actual hearing was the time to say it
 
Politically this is a strong move by the Dems. But dirty as hell and now this type of crap will happen more often. Feinstein should be censored.

If we accept your assumption that this is all a grand political conspiracy by the Dems (which I'm not prepared to do), still, one could easily point to the Republicans treatment of Garland as the start of all this.

Garland was very qualified for the Supreme Court and his nomination was stopped simply because of politics.
 
If we accept your assumption that this is all a grand political conspiracy by the Dems (which I'm not prepared to do), still, one could easily point to the Republicans treatment of Garland as the start of all this.

Garland was very qualified for the Supreme Court and his nomination was stopped simply because of politics.

garland did not have the votes
 
  • Like
Reactions: okcpokefan12
garland did not have the votes

Garland wasn't even given a chance at a hearing by Republicans playing hardball. And now Republicans are complaining about Dems "maybe" playing hardball with Kavanaugh? C'Mon Man!
 
Last edited:
Wow, the righties on this board are melting down over this. Funny too how some are just convinced she is either lying or all of this is part of some grand conspiracy by the Dems.

Maybe just sit back and reserve judgment till all the facts come out?

We were informed by you that he was completely "exposed" by Harris. You never gave specifics, but you were certain.

Now you want to wait and let the facts come out after having already been exposed?

How fake are you?
 
We were informed by you that he was completely "exposed" by Harris. You never gave specifics, but you were certain.

He was and I gave you specifics. You just can't accept what was provided to you because that would mean you would have to go against the party line.

Now you want to wait and let the facts come out after having already been exposed?

Yep, because the questioning of Kavanaugh by Harris (what we were discussing) was complete, was it not?

Neither Kavanaugh nor Ford have addressed this accusation before the committee yet. Therefore, the wise thing would be to reserve judgment till after both testify about it.

As you like to say...

It's not rocket science. This stuff isnt hard at all.
 
He was and I gave you specifics. You just can't accept what was provided to you because that would mean you would have to go against the party line.



Yep, because the questioning of Kavanaugh by Harris (what we were discussing) was complete, was it not?

Neither Kavanaugh nor Ford have addressed this accusation before the committee yet. Therefore, the wise thing would be to reserve judgment till after both testify about it.

As you like to say...

What was he exposed of?
 
  • Like
Reactions: okcpokefan12
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT