Your a lawyer? And you say this with a straight face?
Yes, and I'm telling your right now that had Kavenaugh done that in a courtroom, he would have been perceived as hiding something. In my experience, juries like straight answers. They will buy BS from the lawyers, but they don't buy it from the witnesses.
I'm sorry to inform you that you are not a mind reader and are falling on the side of confirmation bias, a very, very simple thing to both do and recognize. Strictly looking at the mechanics of the question and the answer, you're wrong. You cant read minds. And had she simply said something like "out of the DC office" or "Mr Green, Gray, or Blue or Mrs Navy or Muave" then she gets her question answered.
Hell, if she were prepared, she could have handed him a list with names and locations or had a projector put said list overhead.
It's not rocket science. This stuff isnt hard at all.
No, this isn't hard. So let's review the record:
Senator Harris: Judge, have you ever discussed special counsel Mueller or his investigation with anyone?
Simple question. If I asked you that, what would you say? It is a simple question. Yes or no.
What does Kavenaugh do? Doesn't answer it. Starts stuttering. Gets flustered. WHY? Would you? Damn, almost all Americans have discussed it. What is so wrong in saying "Yes"? He can't do it though lol!
Next up...
Senator Harris: Have you discussed it with anyone at a certain law firm?
Kavenaugh's response to a narrowing of the scope (since you were so concerned about scope)? More stuttering. More evasiveness.
Why? Answer the question.
But he can't.
He responds, "Is there a person you talked to." lol
He is now afraid she knows something he wasn't prepped on. He is more concerned with giving the "right" answer instead of the TRUTHFUL answer. Bam.
She exposed him. Clear to see. All because he couldn't answer a simple question.
