I'm just like you Harry.So when you find out your vote didn’t make that happen you just keep all your surplus? What a dick.
I'm just like you Harry.So when you find out your vote didn’t make that happen you just keep all your surplus? What a dick.
Good point. They still have capitalism in Seattle.
Yes, public housing projects have been notoriously successful. We need more of them. Free room and board and the mental illness and substance abuse just vanish into thin air!!!I think the government should give them homes and I vote accordingly
Yes, public housing projects have been notoriously successful. We need more of them. Free room and board and the mental illness and substance abuse just vanish into thin air!!!
Public housing has been very successful at giving people housing.Yes, public housing projects have been notoriously successful. We need more of them. Free room and board and the mental illness and substance abuse just vanish into thin air!!!
Actual examples play zero role in the liberal playbook.
If you can't beat em, accuse them of colluding with the Russians
If you can't beat em, character assasination and arrest a few cohorts
If you can't beat em, bring on the porn star
If you can't beat em, allow illegals to vote
If you can't beat em, get rid of the electoral college
If you can't beat em, you might want to change what your selling
That's soooo 1990's. Can't disagree with what I posted.I'll bet you were singing that tune during the Clinton era weren't you?
Keep going, you're doing great.Can too.
WE. AREN'T. A. DEMOCRACY.
WE. ARE. A. REPUBLIC.
The electoral college enforces that. If the EC ever is bypassed, it's time to leave the republic.
Yep.Democrats don't seem
Next thing you know the zealots on the left will claim that the state representation in the Senate is unfair as well. Oh wait wasn't there a thread on that recently?
The USSC and the EC are the last vestiges that continue to hold this country together. The Dems start dismantling them and it is the end of the republic.
Keep going, you're doing great.
It's trueDemocrats don't seem
Next thing you know the zealots on the left will claim that the state representation in the Senate is unfair as well. Oh wait wasn't there a thread on that recently?
This is the fun part: so what's your solution?
How is it unfair? The House is based on population. The Senate is equal for each state.It's true
It isn't unfair. It just isn't based directly on population.How is it unfair? The House is based on population. The Senate is equal for each state.
Because the number of people represented by each senator isn't roughly equal.How is it unfair? The House is based on population. The Senate is equal for each state.
Uh, and your point would be?Because the number of people represented by each senator isn't roughly equal.
Have you been hanging out with toon, sys and pokebear?Because the number of people represented by each senator isn't roughly equal.
So delete the Senate?Because the number of people represented by each senator isn't roughly equal.
The Senate represents the States. There are 50 states. Each state has two senators. The House covers the population of the states.Because the number of people represented by each senator isn't roughly equal.
Or admit DC Guam and Puerto Rico. Split California into multiple states and give each NYC burough statehoodSo delete the Senate?
Well then it is unfair for a chamber representing geographies to be coequal with a chamber representing actual people.The Senate represents the States. There are 50 states. Each state has two senators. The House covers the population of the states.
Chuckle. Why just California and NYC? We could split every state into multiple states.Or admit DC Guam and Puerto Rico. Split California into multiple states and give each NYC burough statehood
Just because you say it as a fact doesn't make it one. It just makes it your opinion.Well then it is unfair for a chamber representing geographies to be coequal with a chamber representing actual people.
No it isn't. And the Senate isn't coequal. The House has the purse strings.Well then it is unfair for a chamber representing geographies to be coequal with a chamber representing actual people.
Yeah or we could just abolish the SenateChuckle. Why just California and NYC? We could split every state into multiple states.
Good luck with that. I'm rooting for you.Yeah or we could just abolish the Senate
The framers set it up correctly. Tejas & Alaska are as big as 250 Delawares or more
Believe it or not arguments about fairness usually hinge on opinionJust because you say it as a fact doesn't make it one. It just makes it your opinion.
In my fairness calculus only living beings are given considerationNo it isn't. And the Senate isn't coequal. The House has the purse strings.