The studies are conclusive on IQ, pilt. The "all cultures are equal" bullish*t fed to us by the "progressives" is exactly that, a bunch of bullsh*t.
"Angry white men"
- Thread starter BIGOSUFAN
- Start date
The studies are conclusive on IQ, pilt. The "all cultures are equal" bullish*t fed to us by the "progressives" is exactly that, a bunch of bullsh*t.
Also, as a primer on white self interest would you recommend the Turner Diaries or the Dylan Roof Manifesto?
Typical "progressive" retort.
Pointing out the truth is not racist (as your smartass comment about stromfront implied). There's a plethora of scientific evidence out there about this. I recommend this book, written by a Harvard professor which is a nice summary of the IQ studies:
Amazon product ASIN 0684824299
Pointing out the truth is not racist (as your smartass comment about stromfront implied). There's a plethora of scientific evidence out there about this. I recommend this book, written by a Harvard professor which is a nice summary of the IQ studies:
Amazon product ASIN 0684824299
What is Biosocial Criminology - and what can it tell us about the occurrence of criminal behavior? Dr. Kevin M. Beaver joins Stefan Molyneux to discuss the field of biosocial criminology, racial differences in racial crime statistics, the contrast with environmental factors, predictors of criminal behavior and challenges of political correctness within science.
Dr. Kevin M. Beaver is a professor at Florida State University's College of Criminology and Criminal Justice and an expert on biosocial criminology, which explores the biological and environmental factors involved in crime and antisocial behavior.
What You Didn't Know About IQ with Dr. Kevin M. Beaver
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tg0O...
The Nurture Versus Biosocial Debate in Criminology
http://www.fdrurl.com/kevin-beaver-nvn
Biosocial Criminology: New Directions in Theory and Research
http://www.fdrurl.com/kevin-beaver-nd
Biosocial Criminology: A Primer
http://www.fdrurl.com/kevin-beaver-pr...
I would listen to the interview directly above. Evolution definitely hasn't made all human beings the same.
Dr. Kevin M. Beaver’s research examines the biosocial underpinnings to antisocial behaviors. He has employed behavioral genetic and molecular genetic methodologies to unpack the gene-environmental basis to a range of criminal and delinquent outcomes.
He is the past recipient of the American Society of Criminology Ruth Shonle Cavan Young Scholar Award and the National Institute of Justice’s graduate research fellowship.
Beaver has published more than 150 articles and more than 25 book chapters and is the author/editor of 10 books including Biosocial Criminology: A Primer. His research has appeared in journals as diverse as American Journal of Public Health, Biological Psychiatry, Criminology, Developmental Psychology, and Sexual Abuse.
Source: http://criminology.fsu.edu/faculty-and-staff/college-faculty/kevin-beaver/
"Widely debunked"= the liberals/progressives don't like it because it makes them feel bad, but they cannot objectively refute the scientific evidence.
There will never be equality in wealth accumulation or home ownership rates between whites, blacks and Latinos. And the reason has nothing to do with "oppression" or "racism." It's the same reason why Persians and Indians have much higher GDPs per capita than whites here in America or why it is tougher for an Asian to get into Harvard than a white person. Same reason why there aren't any white guys starting at CB in the NFL.
You are probably onto something. The conspiracy to bury the racial truth contained within the hallowed pages of the Bell Curve runs so deep that only cranks on message boards (usually Stormfront and VNN not OSI) cite it.
Or maybe the scientific evidence has been objectively refuted.
Was it your superior white IQ that allowed you to formulate that sentence?
Can you get me the figures for Persian GDP per capita?
I'm OK with calling race a social construct as long as we acknowledge social constructs can affect people. These charts are from Forbes. I believe Irish, Italian, and even Slavs were included in "Whites."
I notice Jews and Asians are regrettably absent from these graphics. I wonder why? Are they lumped together with whites? Both groups demographically do much better than whites is why I ask.
That's a shame if you really want to understand a socioeconomic difference as relates to the graphic you posted. Jews as a group tend to do better economically than Western European heritage white folk.
Anyway, these graphs are a perfect example of what I'm talking about. Whites are defined all the time and whatever way creates the best straw man to blame for the social justice issue of the day.
Not sure why you need me to carry your water. Tell him yourself putz. I never mentioned racial iq's and if there is a difference, I'm more Irish and native than whatever @davidallen says is white, so I'm at best behind whites, Jews and Asians in the brains department you racist. Get off my ancestral lands!
Here is one with Asians included. It is CNN so determine for yourself the correct size of your salt grain.
If you go back and read what Davidallen said it is pretty clear that his point is not that there is no whiteness, just that there is no coherent white self interest.
I'm sorry - did I EVER define White - in this thread or anywhere else? Asking a provocative question is a bit different than answer the question...
Sometimes... not when I have had a lot of Cheerios though...
I was thinking it would mean more coming from someone not in the progressive tribe. I also figured that since you are so eager to make the social construct point, that you would really jump at the opportunity to tell people who are saying IQ is racial that they are full of shit.
^Calls the "white racists" a straw man in thread with people insisting blacks have lower IQs.
Well I'm a big fan of context so IF blacks on average score lower on IQ tests in America, my first thought is not that they are an inferior race but that culturally they are incredibly disadvantaged thanks to failed progressive agendas. Diet, education and cultural importance placed on achievement affect test scores. So I can easily find you both full of shit. How bout that?
Strong, only thing I would add is ensuring the test has been validated against consequential cultural biases.
Last edited:
Is bowling a sport? Are golfers athletic? Just looking for some clarification on what you consider athletic.
Sure, raw athletic ability i.e., stronger, run faster, and jump higher. Just asking for the boards perception on average since it is the stereotype. Generally, it's also not considered to be a racist point of view.
Just don't try to explain any theories for it (jimmy the Greek)
One other thing regarding IQ, I'm a believer in different types of IQ. Kind of antiquated to limit IQ to a standardized test.
As an individual, Dez Bryant would probably (based on boneheaded decisions) not do great on an IQ test but has tremendously powerful motor control and athletic IQ that is off the charts.
Not an easy thing to explain - IQ.
Not an easy thing to explain - IQ.
I'm gonna go with no. No racial correlation to athletic potential. Genetic yes. Cultural yes by sport. Race no.
Similar threads
