37 Women Before and After Third-Wave Feminism
- Thread starter NZ Poke
- Start date
Still doesn't say "radical feminism exists because guys can't perform in bed."
I would expect you of all people to have a stronger case before throwing out words like "misogynist."
Still doesn't say "radical feminism exists because guys can't perform in bed."
I would expect you of all people to have a stronger case before throwing out words like "misogynist."
"There would be a whole lot less radical feminism...if some guys could simply perform in bed."
We'll just roll with your semantics from now on then. Radical feminists just want better quality dicks. I'll give you and shyster full credit.
Semantics did.
What does "a whole lot less" mean to you? 1 or 2, maybe 3? Just curious.
Syskatine: There would be a whole lot less bugs crawling under your skin if you would stop using meth
Medic: Bugs come from bug eggs not from meth, science denier
Medic: Bugs come from bug eggs not from meth, science denier
Yeah, not even close, but I admire the effort on defense.
You won. Radical feminists just need better dick and there'd be a whole lot less of them. It's not misogynist to say that. You and shyster have schooled me in the way of progressive or whatever it's called.
I actually have a few friends who consider themselves radical feminists. Are you a purveyor of better dick or is that just syskatine? I'd like to refer them to someone for "the cure." I'm happily married or I'd try to help them myself, hairy armpits and all.
Well, shysterkine posted "if some guys could simply perform in bed." I'm assuming he's talking about sex which in my world involves my dick. Is he maybe talking about a puppet show, or maybe playing the trumpet, or even cooking? Song and Dance? Poetry recital?
@Medic007
This is an example of you not getting it -- you never will. You can't have balls, be straight, and be a Mean Girl and expect to get anywhere with women. Learn. And as confusing as this may seem, they are also okay with acknowledging differences. But can identify a Booger Eater when they see it. Your clumsy "gotcha" stuff is just irritating, too.
All the weird "cankles" and "bitch" stuff that you post speaks to misogyny 100 times more than all your clumsy gotcha stuff. You have a.body of work of female hangups in here. There's animus in it.
This is an example of you not getting it -- you never will. You can't have balls, be straight, and be a Mean Girl and expect to get anywhere with women. Learn. And as confusing as this may seem, they are also okay with acknowledging differences. But can identify a Booger Eater when they see it. Your clumsy "gotcha" stuff is just irritating, too.
All the weird "cankles" and "bitch" stuff that you post speaks to misogyny 100 times more than all your clumsy gotcha stuff. You have a.body of work of female hangups in here. There's animus in it.
Syskatine: If OSU could just close better in recruiting there would be less "show boats being controlled by handlers"
Medic: I actually know a couple show boats maybe OSU could come close on them since I can't due to my marital status
You're just like Biff. That's why you screech so much about him. You are simply in the virtue signalling game to blunt your guilt. Be a man and own it. Maybe you can do better than your truck stop fantasies if you started acting like you had some balls.
Me: Posting that there'd be less radical feminists if some guys could perform in bed is misogynist.
07pilt and shyster: No it isn't because [insert weird but completely impotent defense here].
Me: Fine. It isn't misogynist if you dudes say so. Radical feminists just need better dick. I'll give you guys credit for it.
07pilt: Muffins with cheese have high quality ceramic brakes. I showed Albert my skates.
shyster: [searching through Craigslist ads with keywords "ISO cheap male lot lizard"] You hate women!
Me to myself: These dudes are snorting lab grade 25I-NBOMe...
I love where this thread ended up.
I thought we’d be discussing how 20 year old me likes supposedly (according to NZ) mannish women.
I thought we’d be discussing how 20 year old me likes supposedly (according to NZ) mannish women.
Calling an obvious misreading of someone's post misogynist is a strange hill to die on unless you have some serious guilt that you need to virtue signal away.
That the world is full of radical feminists from the perspective of the bad dick havers due to sour grapes from repeated rejection (due to bad dick).
It doesn't read that way. Not even close. I suppose when he posts "trannies," he means something else too?
You have my numbers identifying the cute-ish girls in our resident “entertainer of ideas”’s original post that 20 yr old JD would have likely taken a shot at.
Feel free.
Just know that I would not consider any of them now. Not because my tastes have changed, but because my wife carries a gun for a living and isn’t afraid to use it.
Lemme check this out and I'll perform the necessary critiques.
24, 27, 35, and 36 are all hell yes. I'm out on 17 because I'm not into the corpse in a casket look. I would add 14, 16, and then 20 sans armpit hair. Might add 5 for 2 very obvious reasons...
I'm not sayin' I'm just sayin' -- I think there'd be a whole lot less radical feminism and this feminism hating if some guys could simply perform in bed. It explains everything.
How do you think he that good dick would cure "this feminism hating" ?
Not sure what what you meant to post (typo), so I'll take a guess...
"I think there'd be a whole lot less feminism hating if some guys could perform in bed."
That supports your angle.
"I think there'd be a whole lot less radical feminism if some guys could perform in bed."
That doesn't support your angle.
When written together, it says that there would be less radical feminism and thus less hating of the radical feminism if some guys could perform in bed (assuming better dick quality and not playing the piano or baritone in bed).
Hmmmm... well I was very into Melissa Ethridge at that point, when I learned she played for the other team it was rough.
24, 27, 35, and 36 are all hell yes. I'm out on 17 because I'm not into the corpse in a casket look. I would add 14, 16, and then 20 sans armpit hair. Might add 5 for 2 very obvious reasons...
100 years ago: 5, 6, 7 (look at those crazy sexy eyes), 14, 17 x 2, 24 x 2, 32, 35, 36 is flat hot. Can't get around the pit hair.
24, 27, 35, and 36 are all hell yes. I'm out on 17 because I'm not into the corpse in a casket look. I would add 14, 16, and then 20 sans armpit hair. Might add 5 for 2 very obvious reasons...
I’m into pale skinned Celtic gals.
Sue me.
24, 27, 35, and 36 are all hell yes. I'm out on 17 because I'm not into the corpse in a casket look. I would add 14, 16, and then 20 sans armpit hair. Might add 5 for 2 very obvious reasons...
Thus ensuring that we basically agree that NZ Poke is an anti-Semitic incel with mommy issues.
#Community
what would I find if I searched your posting history for Melania? glass house son.
5 just has that "personality."
Are 7 "pre" and "post" actually the same people?
6 just doesn't get it done for me post. Might be the hair, but not sure a change there would do it.
Agreed on 14, 24, 35, and 36.
17 discussed previously. I like pale skinned chicks but there's something unnatural about her color. Maybe too much white in the makeup base.
32, you're definitely snorting some lab grade 25I-NBOMe or 6-APB.
After additional review, I'm going to have to add 29 to mine.
We have a handy dandy search function here.
https://oklahomastate.forums.rivals.com/search/374064/?q=Melania&o=date&c[user][0]=960
Zero posts debasing her in any way.
You’re welcome.
Similar threads
