To who?If so that fuel by product will be most likely sold as fuel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To who?If so that fuel by product will be most likely sold as fuel.
Of course I do. But it has to happen organically over time as opposed to governmental edicts. What I don’t trust is the government putting in regulations or usage thresholds that correspond.And you have no faith in the invisible hand of the market to create the supply necessary to meet the demand?
Here’s some friendly advice, Pilt. Quit while you still have a little dignity left. Medic and Ostatedchi are eating your lunch.fuel consumers?
coolOf course I do. But it has to happen organically over time as opposed to governmental edicts. What I don’t trust is the government putting in regulations or usage thresholds that correspond.
Ponca Dan, what happened to you? You used to believe in the market.Here’s some friendly advice, Pilt. Quit while you still have a little dignity left. Medic and Ostatedchi are eating your lunch.
What are they going to do with it?fuel consumers?
I continue to believe in a FREE market. The GND proposal which you find so enlightening is the opposite. It should be called a “Command and Control” market, one in which people’s liberty to make choices freely are quashed in favor of government edict.Ponca Dan, what happened to you? You used to believe in the market.
Free markets are so fragile that they can't handle decade long shifts in energy usage? Doesn't sound very robust.I continue to believe in a FREE market. The GND proposal which you find so enlightening is the opposite. It should be called a “Command and Control” market, one in which people’s liberty to make choices freely are quashed in favor of government edict.
Free markets are anything but fragile or lacking in robustness. They’re messy, seemingly disorganized, in a constant state of change (creative destruction) - anarchic, if you will. Fragile? No. It’s individual liberty that is fragile. And the destruction of individual liberty is what’s at stake with every government intervention, notably the full-frontal attack on liberty present in the GND. If the GND is a proper approach then free people operating under a free market will see it is brought to fruition. I understand your pain. You see the GND as an absolute requirement and have no patience to offer it as an alternative to free people, and therefore, since you know better than the rest of us it is necessary to forcefully impose it. Up to this point, however, the American people still have a semblance of independence. But it’s the independence that is fragile, and attacking it seems to be the common denominator in all statist policies.Free markets are so fragile that they can't handle decade long shifts in energy usage? Doesn't sound very robust.
So you aren't worried about the chemical feedstock supply?Free markets are anything but fragile or lacking in robustness. They’re messy, seemingly disorganized, in a constant state of change (creative destruction) - anarchic, if you will. Fragile? No. It’s individual liberty that is fragile. And the destruction of individual liberty is what’s at stake with every government intervention, notably the full-frontal attack on liberty present in the GND. If the GND is a proper approach then free people operating under a free market will see it is brought to fruition. I understand your pain. You see the GND as an absolute requirement and have no patience to offer it as an alternative to free people, and therefore, since you know better than the rest of us it is necessary to forcefully impose it. Up to this point, however, the American people still have a semblance of independence. But it’s the independence that is fragile, and attacking it seems to be the common denominator in all statist policies.
So, we're not going to use it as fuel in the US and will instead sell it to others that are outside of our government's control who will use it as fuel? Sounds like a brilliant plan to reduce carbon emissions.consume it as fuel?
If the only fossil fuels produced in the US were fuels produced as a by product of refining petroleum products for nonfuel use carbon emissions would be reduced significantly.So, we're not going to use it as fuel in the US and will instead sell it to others that are outside of our government's control who will use it as fuel? Sounds like a brilliant plan to reduce carbon emissions.
Link?If the only fossil fuels produced in the US were fuels produced as a by product of refining petroleum products for nonfuel use carbon emissions would be reduced significantly.
Trying to figure out exactly where pilt jumped the shark...a lot from which to choose.
I've been saying that for years. However that doesn't bolster your pricing argument.
How so?I've been saying that for years. However that doesn't bolster your pricing argument.
That says nothing about carbon emissions being decreased "significantly."
Yeah it does require some reasoning on your partThat says nothing about carbon emissions being decreased "significantly."
You call it “reasoning.” The rest of us call it “spin!” (Or “wishful thinking.” Take your pick!)Yeah it does require some reasoning on your part
Call it what you want Dan.You call it “reasoning.” The rest of us call it “spin!” (Or “wishful thinking.” Take your pick!)
Thank you for your permission! You’re too kind! (In case you can’t tell, I’m just messin’ with ya.)Call it what you want Dan.
In case you can’t tell, I’m just messin’ with ya.
Yeah it does require some reasoning on your part
If the only fossil fuels produced in the US were fuels produced as a by product of refining petroleum products for nonfuel use carbon emissions would be reduced significantly.
Link?
If the only fossil fuels produced in the US were fuels produced as a by product of refining petroleum products for nonfuel use carbon emissions would be reduced significantly.
Link?
That says nothing about carbon emissions being decreased "significantly."
I remember when Barry told us we'd save $2,500 a year on health insurance premiums...Yeah it does require some reasoning on your part
Oh no please don't rub my nose in how dumb you are!I remember when Barry told us we'd save $2,500 a year on health insurance premiums...
Aggregate!
"Guaranteeing a job with a family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations, and retirement security to all people of the United States."
How are those electric tanks and solar powered jets coming along?Oh no please don't rub my nose in how dumb you are!
Oh no please don't rub my nose in how dumb you are!
How are those electric tanks and solar powered jets coming along?
I think a low energy bomb hit his house.
Just ask him!