Yeah, Megapoke is still counting down the indictments, lol.
- Thread starter Syskatine
- Start date
What is your tiny little hate boner for me about today? My “sources” Bongino, Solomon, Sara Carter, Jeff Carlson, Tom Fitton, Kimberly Strassel
They have been objectively correct on almost everything for two years as you’ve bought lie after lie and come back for more.
They aren’t hard to find. Go check them out and learn something.
Better yet. Read a book.
which one of those people are talking about inserting fingerprint in a server image?What is your tiny little hate boner for me about today? My “sources” Bongino, Solomon, Sara Carter, Jeff Carlson, Tom Fitton, Kimberly Strassel
They have been objectively correct on almost everything for two years as you’ve bought lie after lie and come back for more.
They aren’t hard to find. Go check them out and learn something.
Better yet. Read a book.
A guy. (Lawyer, but admittedly lawyers are rarely impressive people) on tmb. Maybe you can find him there and straighten him out.
Maybe you should stick to believing the people you listed since they apparently have a better track record than "a guy"
Oh I said multiple times it’s crazy and not my words - or that I believed him. Perhaps you missed that? Actually all I’ve ever said about Seth Rich is that I’m open minded because THAT is what happens to real whistleblowers. Just ask Karen Silkwood.
Still I just wish I had people with a better track record of accuracy than you guys to rely on for debunking it completely.
Just read up on forensic server imaging and how hashes work
Will do. Thanks. Had no idea you were in that line of work.
ps please don’t tell @Been Jammin about this conversation.
What is your tiny little hate boner for me about today? My “sources” Bongino, Solomon, Sara Carter, Jeff Carlson, Tom Fitton, Kimberly Strassel
They have been objectively correct on almost everything for two years as you’ve bought lie after lie and come back for more.
They aren’t hard to find. Go check them out and learn something.
Better yet. Read a book.
Wayyyy out at "tiny little hate boner"
Bwahahahaha
So accurate.
Except..... he's only been wrong about one thing. One. He predicted Blasy Ford wouldn't show up to testify. Beyond that, he's been spot on and you... well.... you've been shitting the bed. Weekly. On a broad never ending stream of topics - now including the whistle leaker - whom you are 100% behind. Even Adam Schiff has punted on that one.
Seriously Walter Mitty, you never win on these things. You get your ass handed to you by a conga line of people and then claim victory and assign fantasy straw man arguments to me that I've never made - find me saying Hillary would go to jail for example.
Sad.
Why do you need my take on this? Until I know more, it looks like police state bullshit. If it's more, I won't hide from it. Same thing I have said on everything I've posted about.
I've inventoried a small slice of your buffoonery in the OP. You've now create some narrative about the "whistle leaker" -- all of which is whole cloth #bornfollowing from some right wing dipshit, I assume. Like Bonginoni -- he' a fox host and biff partisan, right? Figures.
Oh - that adam schiff punted on. Please provide a cite regarding adam schiff punting on the whistle leaker. Today, Oct. 17, 2019, your sumpteenth sillyass toofless conspiracy is predicted as moronic. Let's consider this new revelation bronzed as well. I'm not even sure what it is, but it'll be another doozy.
Oh... anything yet? Those indictments dropping any time soon on Hillz and the emails? I see Fatass is still banging that drum today to the #bornfollowers. What are your sources saying about that?
No, you've recited a variety of things you disagree with me on - which have yet to be conclusively proven one way or another. Your gaslighting may work in whatever corner of the internet you go for your programming, but it doesn't fly here. Again, you do realize the people who read this post also read what you've posted day to day for years? You are absolutely the most gullible nerd on this board but every once in awhile you have an extra french press mocha latte' and flex like Mr Olympia . It's always a fun read to see you spin out on posting portfolios, because yours ain't good broseph.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/...the-whistleblower-to-testify-before-congress/
The last thing Schitt wants is the whistleblower to be public and to testify and be asked why he's worked with Schitt's office before. Use your head, dipschiff.
Geez.... this again? The IG report is next. Durham and Barr after that. Declass. And probably some other curveballs along the way and CERTAINLY more bullshit tinfoil hat leftist conspiracy trains for you to take a ride on to be shat out between now and then.
Only Then will you will have an answer to your retarded rhetorical. I share your frustration at the speed of the wheels of justice, but as lawyer you definitely should know better.
Until I read the above post, I used to think this is what a meltdown looked like:
He's Easier than Monica Lewinski.
And he thinks he would've handled what Kavenaugh went through without losing his shit. He really does. Ask him.
There it is, another conservative rag. I looked, it's all slanted spin.
Yes, and the last thing the House wanted was Mueller to actually testify. It just goes on and one with you.
Sigh... I just googled and posted the first result. What is it with you and sources? I thought you said if it's true, it's true. I guess not... let's see here.... Is Politico far enough removed from *checks notes* conservative rags for you?
Adam Schiff says whistleblower may not testify in ... - Politicohttps://www.politico.com › news › 2019/10/13 › schiff-whistleblower-imp...
Yeah, that's a long list of one. Good job? I guess?
And I admitted I was wrong - as men do, when wrong. Mueller did in fact show up to testify, and it was cringy, sad and counterproductive to the legend that had grown up around him over the previous two years.
It was a horrible idea to drag that guy out in front of the cameras to speak like he had escaped from a nursing home. All he did was solidify the fact that Weissman wrote the report and he put his name on it. His testimony killed any teeth the report had and killed his reputation.
Because good sources pass along true facts and bad sources pass along untrue facts. As I've maintained for years, you only believe the bad sources -- experts in nazi occult, snake oil salesmen, alex breitbart... and that article was more spin that fact, at least two paragraphs or so in. I'm not sure you understand the distinction between fact and inference.
But you have a point in citing my point that true underlying facts makes the narrator's character irrelevant. Glad we're in agreement for a change. So if the whistleblower's story is separately substantiated by the internal call memo, other witnesses, Biff, and multiple statements against interest, why would schiff or anybody else give a shit if the whistleblower testifies?
Yeeeeahhhh.... You are super well known for good sourcing and not #shittingthebed. As I told you - I googled "Schiff says whistleblower not needed" to make a point from this morning and posted the first thing that seemed to quote the little bitch. You read way more into it than that. Let me try this... me talking to you. I'm the source here. Hey sys, Adam Schitt said he may not even need the whistle-leaker. "Probably because he doesn't want that person to testify and have to answer questions about working with him previously."
Because - and I'm just guessing here. he doesn't want the whistle-leaker to answer questions in public. Because, it's all fabricated bullshit, and would not hold up well under scrutiny and might highlight some uncomfortable associations for the whistle leaker.
Look sys, I'm trying to help you here. Work with me would you?
1. Schiff did not expect Trump to release the transcript. Everything you saw after that was Benny Hill show comedy, and now the whistle blower is useless because WE HAVE THE TRANSCRIPT.
2. Schiff moved on away from a quid-pro-quo on the call to making the claim that basically the quid pro quo was that the Ukraine guy would GET a phone call from Trump. And to get that call, he evidently was supposed to find dirt on Biden.
3. Trump's favor was info on CrowdStrike - Not sloppy Joe.
4. It's a garbage story that only idiots believe at this point..... and finally....
5. The vote on impeachment has been cancelled - for one of two reasons. Either Nancy did not have the votes and couldn't get it done, or DID have the votes and did want this to be turned into a trial of the democrats (not Trump) in the Senate. There was no win to this for her, and Schitt did her no favors with his sloppy banana republic soft coup sequel.
Don't get too down buddy. I can see you are having a rough day. Take heart! There will no doubt be another lie you can sink your teeth into any day now. I wish you would eventually wise up and stop emotionally investing in them, but I have to be honest - it's too much fun to fück with you when you do, so... really... I guess what I'm saying is...
Don't stop...
Believing.
I don't know if Syskatine is clueless or pretending to be clueless. Can you help me to recognize my deficiency?
I did recognize early my getting through to said principal is completely beyond my reach. Can it be said that so far you haven't recognized your glaring deficiency?
Oh crap lefties. Here it comes.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-to-interview-clapper-and-dirty-john-brennan/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-to-interview-clapper-and-dirty-john-brennan/
No. No. No, he's not only been wrong about one thing. It takes .02 seconds to google search just one awful slice of his chicanery.
Bongino lied about his consent to be taped. Bongino falsely accused Caputo of attacking his family. Bongino never answered the question he said he could answer.Bongino lied about what Caputo was asking.
Every time, my man. The guy was a failed, professional candidate that literally no community in the country would allow to represent them, but man he's got the answers now. This one little slice, the first name.
You need to disinfect your information and influence ecosystem. This guy is a moron.
I wonder how worried Amerikan Pravda really is. So far, so good. No skin off the hiney so far. Right, Lois? Sure you lost your job for targeting conservative groups. But look at your cushy tax payer funded retirement.
Actually no. That is what the result of a reactor explosion looks like. You are welcome.Until I read the above post, I used to think this was what a meltdown looked like:
You could tell that it pained the authors of that article to report the criminal investigation is expanding.
The press always has to put a qualifier on anything negative towards a Democrat or anti Trumper.
Somebody has an HBO subscription.
I don't see how anyone who saw "Chernobyl" could be desirous of socialism. You want me to name some "white" countries that are sh!tholes? Try Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and the rest of Eastern Europe under the Soviets.
So the roof being blown out, that was from the meltdown? Or maybe the meltdown blew the roof out? Or that the meltdown was inevitable because the roof was missing?
Help this dumb ass figure out what the **** you are trying to say because your words make no sense.
Last edited:
BTW: if you want to watch a brain meltdown, this dude is a candidate. Not necessarily here, may not be now, but keep your eye on this one...
Whatever makes you feel better, moby. Another "parser" who thinks he's clever for playing "gotcha" with mickey-mouse details. Like the lib who said "that wasn't an explosion, it was combustion!"
