Basically, white unarmed people are shot at the same rate as blacks. Lots of factors at work to drive up the things that disproportionately put young black men into these confrontations with cops.
We have a serious problem with police brutality folks. In general. Making this a racial divide is just a distraction from the militarization of local police forces. Who benefits? Why?
BLM is a terrorist organization calling for the killing of cops. It is being positioned as a counterbalance to police brutality. Why?
This Dallas shooting required advance knowledge not only of the route of THAT protest, but of access to the shooting perches, triangulation of the kill zone and synchronized timing. This was planned far in advance and incubated until a convenient and inevitable event to create the protest diversion.
This is not a civil rights movement, and our "president" pushes the race narrative with absolutely no comment on black on black violence or the contextual conditions that have led to a disproportionate number of black men being shot. Why? Who benefits? This does not happen in a vacuum and one thing Barak Obama is not is stupid. He knows context and he knows numbers. Yet his narrative is one of racial division when the simple thing before us at the time of his comments was police brutality without any clear racial component.
Why does he push these artificial narratives? @davidallen I would love your input on this. I at least believe you will ask yourself these questions before you answer with a tribally appropriate regurgitation.
Last edited:
