WTF: Who locked the bagman thread?
- Thread starter davidallen
- Start date
This happens so seldolmly that I can’t remember any other occasion, exclusive of the time he referenced earlier.
You're going to tell me what your actual problem is because I don't know what else to tell you out of thin air.
You say you want things more even-handed, I'm telling you we let you guys have free reign. I don't know if its' possible to make it any more fair.
Good grief da get a grip. Are you actually insinuating there isn’t enough trump bashing on this board? Start four original threads trashing trump, I’ll hang out with you in them. Damn you are pissy tonight.
I've given you the remedy. If you have an alternative to suggest please do so.
As to free reign, your actions contradict. You man enough to admit that or you plan to continue to make the lame denials?
This is so liberal. A tiny thing in perspective happened but see how a liberal in the wild reacts as if he was raped by Harvey Weinstein? Logically, percentage wise of total posts this is not even detectable.
Emotionally?
Emotionally?
I love your passion for free speech. Too bad it’s not always consistently applied.
Let's take me out of it. What changes would you like to see made in moderation practices on this board for mods in general that would make this board better for everyone who visits.
He’s trolling. No way he gives us this much material unintentionally.
We're calling it a mistake now?
If I admit to making a mistake, you're happy and all your problems are resolved?
And why it didn't work is because I really have good intentions towards every poster here. You're chasing some need for me to have an agenda and I don't. At the end of the day, we're all Pokes.
That's what my money is on...
Edit: or looking for a way out in similar fashion to Syspussy.
Explain again the intention behind locking a thread? Relate that back to the wide open ethic of this board if you can twist yourself into that knot.
You are working much too hard here. You ****ed up, too proud or arrogant to admit it.
That's what people who operate on good faith do David. They work hard to try and resolve issues with others who hold grievances against them.
Deflection is not good faith. Ducking the question is not good faith. Refusing to admit you were wrong is not good faith.
@Jeff J. has a call to make.
No matter what happens, I want to know I forgive you for calling me a chickenshit on numerous occasions.
this thread has enlightened me
just imagine the crap trump has to deal with
dave you sir carry the libtard torch well
just imagine the crap trump has to deal with
dave you sir carry the libtard torch well
there was one closed yesterday about a bagman flipping
there was one where pokebeartard was miffed he was getting gay bathhouse adds popping up when he viewed this site
at some point you should poor another merlot
I've answered your questions fully. You just want the truth to be something else.
David, I'm sure you have been around 24/7 pol long enough to know that I do not moderate it at all, by design. I generally don't post here and don't read all that often. I do believe having a board where people can discuss politics has some value...otherwise there wouldn't be such a board. However, me interjecting my personal brand of politic (whatever that may be) by moderating or posting is generally a bad idea.
As it pertains to this thread, I've read it but still don't feel I have a good handle on what the problem is. From the outside looking in on one thread, it looks to me that PDT has offered an explanation of his reasoning, as well as possible solutions (unlocking a thread, merging threads, etc.)
