That's Brad and Alf, EXACTLY. Over and over, and then in hindsight, "Who, me? I never kicked that football." They're the ultimate identity politics fans, and they accuse everyone else of it. They never just stop and objectively review all the silly narratives they fell for. Even Alf was re-tweeting a guy from Moscow, and he's riiiiiiight back, listening to the same morons.
Wiretap info within next two weeks?
- Thread starter MegaPoke
- Start date
That's Brad and Alf, EXACTLY. Over and over, and then in hindsight, "Who, me? I never kicked that football." They're the ultimate identity politics fans, and they accuse everyone else of it. They never just stop and objectively review all the silly narratives they fell for. Even Alf was re-tweeting a guy from Moscow, and he's riiiiiiight back, listening to the same morons.
Taking ownership is the first step toward optimizing your life.
Don't live afraid, Swampy Syster. I'm here for you.
The tweet I posted just had the Hogg kid in California in another made for TV crisis.
What is it you think you have me on?
Probably nothing outside of looks, money, and women. The tweet was straight outta Russia, accusing the kids of being actors as i recall, and the tweet you posted went viral as an example of clumsy russian fake tweeting.
No, that was a tweet from someone else.
Mine was Russian sourced but was about an actual event.
Not a doctored photo.
‘Looks, money, and women.’
That’s a hell no, double hell no, and everyone knows you aren’t into girls.
Mine was Russian sourced but was about an actual event.
Not a doctored photo.
‘Looks, money, and women.’
That’s a hell no, double hell no, and everyone knows you aren’t into girls.
Last edited:
Well we are on different pages now, because I have no idea to what you are referring.
Type slowly for me. Bullet points preferred.
Are you talking about this story?
If anyone forgot, look who appeared in this made-for-TV-news drama (across the country from Florida).
it genuinely makes me happy when you double down on dumb things you've already doubled down on, because it'll make it hurt worse.
Speaking of not aging well, the nut jobs are the ones relying on KimDotCom, anxiously awaiting #PizzaGate arrests, claiming shit like fake birth certificates, howling about murderous first ladies and the like.
eight years of running roughshod over rule of law
they didn’t think trump would win and
got sloppy
now they can’t keep their timelines and stories congruent
itsa problem dave
Can't wait for the evidence... is that too much to expect? Something more than Qanon and Reddit posts?
evidence lol
the evidence is clear the dnc funded steel dossier was the catalyst for the fisa courts and it just unravels from there
i’m sure they’re hiding their shame til after midterms trying to keep the mast visible above the waterline
Last edited:
In the Google world, this response is akin to a square kick to the balls then twerking over the dude while he's writhing in pain.
The making of mythology right before our eyes. Of course it requires suspending your better sense and forgetting history.
"Occam shave me down to primal truth—return me to the womb"
Open your eyes. Push yourself inside. Contemplate all of your senses.
Tell them what you want to lose.
They'll just spit in your face... Push you back in your place.
Concentrate all of your answers. Tell them what you think you know...
They're going to give us what we want
Per usual, Been makes the statement and the only like is Davidallen. To funny, or maybe ironic.
There are lots of people taking hits to their credibility these days btw. I suspect when all this unravels Trumps credibility will be more intact than the credibility of people pushing the “Russian Interfered” narrative.
I’m in the camp of giving Trump some latitude in his boasting because of the negative press he gets en-mass.
The gun runners, ex-rodent in chief & holder how much bad press did they get there? Was their credibility ever in question by WaPo or NYT? In fact they immediately tried to find something Bush did that was similar, to smooth over the malfeasance.
The ex-rodent in chief makes a “deal” with Iran and was probably smoking the Mullahs poles in private while handing over billions in cash for the Iranians. All done w/o congressional approval. Any credibility issues there?
The list could go on and on as to how the ex-rodent in chief made promises that never manifested themselves; like your doctor, can keep your doctor, premiums will drop by $2,500 per family and so on. Don’t remember any of the resident libs questioning “his credibility.”
Fact is Trump (and Bush before) we’re dog piled by WaPo, NYT and others while their savior the ex-rodent in chief rarely got hassled about the outrageous things he said; they speak Austrian in Austria, I’m going to make the ocean levels recede etc etc.
Libs need to tread the “credibility line” pretty carefully, as their most recent savior made a plethora of promises and statements that bordered on ignorant, asinine and or flat out stupid.
Finally just so the libs understand, because that punk ass bitch Obama got away with it, doesn’t mean I think it’s okay for Trump to do it. Just that Trump is being looked at through a 40 x 3,000 microscope while the previous occupant of the WH was being scrutinized through the bottom of a coke bottle.
Given the revelations that the FBI was spying on Trump before the Papadopoulos drunken boasts which they claim started the whole thing I do believe Trump knows the dirt on what the Obama administration was doing.
Very curious, but do have some standards in what I will entertain as factual. Curious wants to see Mueller finish his work. Curious wants to see the OIG report.
Curious doesn't fall for the bullshit excuse making that starts with "what Trump really meant..." or "petty corruption like Cohen's pay to play doesn't mean anything because HRC". That is stupidity.
Incurious, I would say not willing to pretend that the truth doesn't matter...
You know that they aren't above rigging the process.
You ignored it when it happened in your own party.
What makes you think they're incapable of the same against an opposition opponent?
Are you willing to ignore it again?
You ignored it when it happened in your own party.
What makes you think they're incapable of the same against an opposition opponent?
Are you willing to ignore it again?
Good post.
However, from my admittedly slightly biased perception, there appears to be quite a bit of smoke. I also believe that both parties have played their constituents as fools. It will be interesting to look back a year from now.
I like this but decoding trump for some of you is a legit public service.
The big brush is out again.
Who ignored what again? You have a strong need to put such a nice neat fence around anyone not in your camp.
You voted for the perpetrator. You ignored bending the system.
You never actually answer a question.
