WikiLeaks - Emails show Hillary Clinton taking step-by-step instruction from Soros
- Thread starter ThorOdinson13
- Start date
It seems Assange has a dislike for HilLIARy. Her privileged weathly crooked fat ass deserves every bit of it. Maybe the bootlickers will finally realize what a pile of shit the Clintons are.
He hates her and wants to ruin her for the horrible person she is. I'm sure he hates trump too, but the big fish he wants to get at the moment is Hillary...and I love it.
It would be a very healthy day for America to see someone of her status in handcuffs.
Good for him. If he's got something on trump, f*** him. I want to see that too.
Flipping channels this morning and found unhinged Glen Beck doing his best to undermine Wikileaks and tie them to Russia.
It's funny to hear him accuse others of propaganda.
It's funny to hear him accuse others of propaganda.
I haven't heard or read everything, but the first scandalous round of emails was... eh. I thought it would be much worse, after all the headlines and protests. There wasn't anything in there that was wildly offensive to me. Debbie said Bernie wouldn't be POTUS and some guy said Bernie's an atheist and that would hurt him. I mean, who wouldn't expect any group of political junkies to have emails saying that stuff? Again, I haven't read everything, but the little I read was very underwhelming, and I was kind of ready to get lathered up and twist off on the DNC...
Someone had a good analogy. It's one thing to know how the sausage is made. It's another thing to see it getting made. When laid bare, it's pretty hypocritical for the party of tolerance to try to use someone's religious views against them. Your party is built on dreamers and idealists. The huge protests are pretty clear evidence that you are tone deaf on this, as usual.
"The will and consent of the governed"
Seems like that what some people are aspiring to (even if their proposed policy is crap). So when they see the field tilted against them, circumventing rules and procedure, it's understandably an outrage.
With or without the Trump context referring to a demographic as "Taco Bowl" was inappropriate.
People tend to be inappropriate. Not defending "taco bowls" but I do think it's funny to see the DNC come under criticism for being racially and religiously insensitive after being the PC police most of the time.
Some delicious irony, that.
Agree. I don't think the dnc guy who referred to them as taco bowls meant any disrespect at all, but because dems love to scream racism, **** them, hope it hurts them.
Clinton Campaign hacked. Maybe Assange isn't lying about more to come?
https://www.google.com/amp/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_579bc32be4b08a8e8b5e1f15/amp?client=safari
https://www.google.com/amp/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_579bc32be4b08a8e8b5e1f15/amp?client=safari
I can't wait to see the hypocrisy that arises from this. Bitch supported spying on Americans for years.
Why would Assange bother lying? If he says he has stuff there is little doubt in my mind that he does. The question is when will he release it? His timing on the DNC leak was impeccable. Very sinister. He'll likely save the dirtiest stuff for last. There's no doubt he dislikes HilLIARy
He hates Hillary. Also, he does have a history of stating he'll release damning information and not delivering. But he does hate Hillary with a blind passion because of her threat to prosecute.
He mentioned in an interview that he believes she'll be a war hawk, citing Libya as an example.
This is a real life episode of VEEP. There was an episode in which the fictional (and awful) president Selina Meyer tweeted something accidentally and blamed Chinese hackers to divert blame and embarrassment. And just a few months later, Hillary is blaming Russian hackers for the same reason.
At least Meyer is funny and attractive.
Check out Assange's history when he says he's got something, he has something.
Looks like he's got the goods on Hillary being involved in secretly arming Syrian rebels, now also known as ISIS, with weapons from Libya. She has denied, under oath in congress that she knew anything about this.
Because a Republican did it once it makes it right (pun intended).
I can't help it. Shitty candidates are shitty. Are we really going to resolve ourselves to debating levels of shitty to justify our vote?
Because he is as much an attention whore as anyone else in this whole sh!tshow?
I prefer to "acknowledge" instead of "resolve." HRC is uninspiring, corporate styrofoam and Trump is plainly crazy. I guess I prefer styrofoam to crazy and think Bill is cagey enough that we won't get in trouble overseas. There's my passionate pro-HRC speech.
But with Trump you might get to watch it all burn. Way more exciting.
