Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So laughable.
I did, but not the issue. Her and Gorsuch should've both recused, imo.Guess you missed bearcats thread.
I did, but not the issue. Her and Gorsuch should've both recused, imo.
At least they disclosed it, earned the money, and didn't have some benefactor greasing them.
And you, cultboi? Let me guess, Thomas was fine, as was Gorsuch, but Sotomayor needs impeached?
LOL can you read??As predicted, thats different. 🤣🤣🤣
Your link clearly says its different. I read very well. 🤣LOL can you read??
So do you have a problem with the good Justice Thomas's raking it in?Your link clearly says its different. I read very well. 🤣
"The allegations against Clarence Thomas and Harlan Crow are definitely not the same as the attacks being made on Justice Sonia Sotomayor."
Convicted yet? I am just rubbing lefties nose's in the 💩 pile of hypocrisy. You lefties (I) vag raged for days about CT yet no Vag Rage Threads started about Sotomayor.So do you have a problem with the good Justice Thomas's raking it in?
Very different! $3 million for Sotomayor; $150k for Thomas.Your link clearly says its different. I read very well. 🤣
"The allegations against Clarence Thomas and Harlan Crow are definitely not the same as the attacks being made on Justice Sonia Sotomayor."
LOL tell me you're in a cult without telling me you're in a cult.And you, cultboi? Let me guess, Thomas was fine, as was Gorsuch, but Sotomayor needs impeached?
Convicted yet? I am just rubbing lefties nose's in the 💩 pile of hypocrisy. You lefties (I) vag raged for days about CT yet no Vag Rage Threads started about Sotomayor.
StRaNgE. 🤣
Yeah, one earned the money by writing books in a straightforward contract and disclosed it.Very different! $3 million for Sotomayor; $150k for Thomas.
Give us something to criticize. Did he break any law or commit any other infraction? You would know more about the ethics side of this than I do since you’re in the business. If it’s more than accepting gifts from a rich friend, then I’d like to know more about it.Watch and see if any of the cult can criticize their CLarence Thomas, lol.
He failed to disclose multiple and significant gifts on his disclosure forms. The only real recourse is impeachment and we all know that's not happening.Give us something to criticize. Did he break any law or commit any other infraction? You would know more about the ethics side of this than I do since you’re in the business. If it’s more than accepting gifts from a rich friend, then I’d like to know more about it.
When he is convicted of a crime let us know CuLt bOi.Watch and see if any of the cult can criticize their CLarence Thomas, lol.
Yup.
Is there a law that requires this or is it just customary? If it’s not a law, probably needs to be….He failed to disclose multiple and significant gifts on his disclosure forms. The only real recourse is impeachment and we all know that's not happening.
There is a law, but the penalties are civilIs there a law that requires this or is it just customary? If it’s not a law, probably needs to be….
Ah. Got it. Thanks for taking the time.There is a law, but the penalties are civil
Lucky for Crow, Thomas and SCOTUS ruled that it isn't a bribe unless there is an explicit quid pro quoSo is Crow being prosecuted? Pretty sure bribing a Supreme Court justice is a criminal offense, IF that is what he did. If that is not the case, then this is just the typical horseshit that comes from the left.
🐎 💩
That doesn’t require a ruling. That just requires common sense.Lucky for Crow, Thomas and SCOTUS ruled that it isn't a bribe unless there is an explicit quid pro quo
It's far from what we can imagine my man.Is there a law that requires this or is it just customary? If it’s not a law, probably needs to be….
He didn't disclose the free money, but there's no consequences to it. The Supreme Court justice pretended he couldn't understant the form.Give us something to criticize. Did he break any law or commit any other infraction? You would know more about the ethics side of this than I do since you’re in the business. If it’s more than accepting gifts from a rich friend, then I’d like to know more about it.
When he is convicted of a crime let us know CuLt bOi.
Seems to me like they would have no choice but to be subject to legislation to remedy disclosure. Easily fixed or am I looking at this all wrong?He didn't disclose the free money, but there's no consequences to it. The Supreme Court justice pretended he couldn't understant the form.
But honestly, the answer is "No." That's the rub -- no other judicial body could get away with taking free $ from people that have business before the court. They make their own rules, and what's forbidden for other judges is apparently okay if you're a supreme.
If only this wasn't queued up as a political argument. The GOP is fighting hard to protect CT rather than sensible SCOTUS reform. Sound familiar?Seems to me like they would have no choice but to be subject to legislation to remedy disclosure. Easily fixed or am I looking at this all wrong?
Protecting Clarence Thomas ≠ reform.If only this wasn't queued up as a political argument. The GOP is fighting hard to protect CT rather than sensible SCOTUS reform. Sound familiar?
Are they fighting to protect Thomas or fighting to protect separation of powers?If only this wasn't queued up as a political argument. The GOP is fighting hard to protect CT rather than sensible SCOTUS reform. Sound familiar?