Consider how the DNC bosses NBC around, as we learned through Wikileaks.
Was Hillary using hand signals to Lester Holt during the debate?
- Thread starter NZ Poke
- Start date
I saw this and thought the same. She, also, appeared to have something in her ear/down her back. A wire perhaps?
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...twice-but-three-different-ways-in-1st-debate/
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...-presidential-debate-conspiracy-theory-rumour
I can see it being a battery pack for the lapel mic, but those don't go up and over. Those are run to the underside of the shirt. Hmmmm...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...twice-but-three-different-ways-in-1st-debate/
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...-presidential-debate-conspiracy-theory-rumour
I can see it being a battery pack for the lapel mic, but those don't go up and over. Those are run to the underside of the shirt. Hmmmm...
Oops. It would be interesting to watch the entire debate to see if she does this scratching thing any other time besides those in that video.
Big shock in this era of increasing censorship.
I'm sure you can look up Hillary hand signals on YouTube and find it.
With all this increasing censorship now, imagine what it's going to be like if we hand off internet control to the UN in a few days.
Granted, not much is likely to change at first. But in the coming years and decades, people will forget all about what we handed over.
And countries who have no protected free speech will gain the ability to get things taken off the internet because it's 'offensive' or 'racist'.
If we lose internet control, and Hillary wins the election, we might be doomed.
Granted, not much is likely to change at first. But in the coming years and decades, people will forget all about what we handed over.
And countries who have no protected free speech will gain the ability to get things taken off the internet because it's 'offensive' or 'racist'.
If we lose internet control, and Hillary wins the election, we might be doomed.
Last edited:
Besides Huma, who would want to run their hands under her shirt?
I don't know about the ear piece but both Hillary and Donald were wearing wireless mics. Which is what that looks like running down her back.
There's a new video in here (for now).
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...y-sending-hand-signals-debate-moderator-holt/
Yeah, I know. I talked about that in another post. Standard is to run the lapel mic cabling under not over.
More to be curious about. You will want to see this..
http://newsninja2012.com/identified-man-removes-folder-from-hillary-podium-slips-to-nbc-holt/
http://newsninja2012.com/identified-man-removes-folder-from-hillary-podium-slips-to-nbc-holt/
We all know Slick Willy is smart enough to not get under those clothes. Why would any sound guy want to?
That's not even motivation enough. Nobody would be able to unexperience an encounter with that mass of flesh being held in somewhat of shape by a Spanxs full body suit that was originally designed by the DOD to carry tanks under helicopters.
So, who fathered the little darlin' that needed a pork chop around her neck to be pseudo-semi-probably not attractive.
This is the last damned time I'm going to 'splain it; ORIFICE! Give a man a clam, there will always be one who answers the call.
You are correct JimmyBob, but any self respecting person that at times has to put themselves at risk to do the job is going to weigh the risks and benefits of carrying out the mission as directed. Putting the mic under her shirt is a very dangerous proposition. If that Spanx gives way, the carnage will look like the sound guy got hit by that train that does 357 mph. The ultimate goal is to put the mic on her, and the safest way is to basically throw it at her and run. I think the mic wire being visible on her is a direct result of risk mitigation by the guy who was called upon to risk his life.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
Is It Fair To Use Donald Trump’s Words (And Attitude) Against Him?- Latest: soonerinlOUisiana