ADVERTISEMENT

Want To See Democrats Heads Explode?

I hate to say this, but I don't want Lara in that seat. She's the first RNC chair that has had a spine and frankly, the RNC chair is a more important for the sustaining of this Republican wave than serving as a generic Red-state Senator.

I'd go with one of the Florida Republican state officials, like Anna Paulina Luna, for that seat.
 
I hate to say this, but I don't want Lara in that seat. She's the first RNC chair that has had a spine and frankly, the RNC chair is a more important for the sustaining of this Republican wave than serving as a generic Red-state Senator.
BINGO! Note that Katie Britt is pushing this, she is rumored to be a Mitch McConnell lackey. The RINOs absolutely want Lara out as RNC co-chair, because she's the first one the RNC has had in years who has actually done her job.

Also note, Trump still hasn't announced his Sec of State pick. We gotta stop letting the media and RINOs jerk our chains.
 
In regards to not announcing the SOS pick, I wonder how much of that is due to potential sequencing for Senate Confirmations. If you announce Rubio today, then there will be fights about whether Rubio can (or should) be part of the confirmations of other cabinet members. By holding off, potentially into the start of his term, Rubio can reliably confirm other confirmation required roles, then accept the SOS nomination. He's 'establishment-enough' that his own confirmation, even in a potential 51-47 Senate would be assured.
 
I hate to say this, but I don't want Lara in that seat. She's the first RNC chair that has had a spine and frankly, the RNC chair is a more important for the sustaining of this Republican wave than serving as a generic Red-state Senator.

I'd go with one of the Florida Republican state officials, like Anna Paulina Luna, for that seat.
Laura Trump gave Republicans the blueprint on how to protect elections and get the Republican vote out. Give her 4 years as a Senator and the have her as JD Vance's running mate in 2028. Might possible have control of the White House for the next 22 years. Our children and their children might thank us for saving the country and getting control of an out of control government instead of cussing us for leaving a mess for them to clean up.
 
In regards to not announcing the SOS pick, I wonder how much of that is due to potential sequencing for Senate Confirmations. If you announce Rubio today, then there will be fights about whether Rubio can (or should) be part of the confirmations of other cabinet members. By holding off, potentially into the start of his term, Rubio can reliably confirm other confirmation required roles, then accept the SOS nomination. He's 'establishment-enough' that his own confirmation, even in a potential 51-47 Senate would be assured.
Memory is hazy, but I don't remember Sessions being involved in any of the Senate confirmations after he was announced as AG.
 
Laura Trump gave Republicans the blueprint on how to protect elections and get the Republican vote out. Give her 4 years as a Senator and the have her as JD Vance's running mate in 2028. Might possible have control of the White House for the next 22 years. Our children and their children might thank us for saving the country and getting control of an out of control government instead of cussing us for leaving a mess for them to clean up.
Fair enough. I'm certainly not against Lara and if that's the role she wants then more power to her.

As for controlling the White House for 22 years, I'm sorry but that's a pipe dream. That's the same kind of talk we got from the libs on this board talking about shifting Demographics and that Republicans may never win another election after Obama's elections. As Republicans make this country better, people will forget about the hard times and suddenly the Republicans will be out of favor due to non-sense topics (think pussy hat parades).

As the old saying goes:

Hard times make strong men;
Strong men make good times;
Good Times make weak men;
Weak men make hard times.
 
Fair enough. I'm certainly not against Lara and if that's the role she wants then more power to her.

As for controlling the White House for 22 years, I'm sorry but that's a pipe dream. That's the same kind of talk we got from the libs on this board talking about shifting Demographics and that Republicans may never win another election after Obama's elections. As Republicans make this country better, people will forget about the hard times and suddenly the Republicans will be out of favor due to non-sense topics (think pussy hat parades).

As the old saying goes:

Hard times make strong men;
Strong men make good times;
Good Times make weak men;
Weak men make hard times.
Yes it is a pipe dream to control the White House or Congress for the next 22 years if it business as usual. However if your goal as a party and to a man is to make a better life for every citizen in this country and they deliver on that, they will be hard to beat. It will take willpower and an intense focus on what is right for the country in order to accomplish that goal and while not likely it can be done. Instead of politicians looking out for the best interest of themselves and their donors they do what is in the best interest of the people it will go along way to that goal. Of course Democrats will do what they always do, lie cheat steal to resist but they should be ridiculed and humiliated for standing in the way.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT