thepostmillennial.com
Cutsie time is over. I want whatever pisses them off the most. It tells me we are over the target. He has shown to be active, but can it translate to national AG? Unkown, but I hope trump looks for his type if he gets into office.
I have no doubt Ramaswamy can define what a woman is.
For many, this would be a positive for the position. We've had plenty who have, and I don't think an AG has performed well over the last 30-40 years.
Takes a bunch of people to investigate 435 House members, 100 Senators, all of their aids, those inn the Executive Branch and all the lobbyist that infest Washington DC.
Maybe but I like the way you think.
Something like that would become a political weapon. Not sure that would be good idea. Unintended consequences most likely our checks and balances could be put in danger.
Not if you investigated everyone, every year.
Has anything ever created by government not been abused? It is the nature of government to corrupt itself. If you want a non corrupt government then stop voting in incompetent politicians. If gov ever asks for mor money the answer is no and fire everyone incharge, because they are obviously to stupid to balance thier budget.
Nope everything government touches, government abuses but in this case the ones being abused would be the politicians. In my view it's a good thing when the politician elected to represent the people are scared of the people. Not in fear of violence but fear of being held accountable
You left out eliminate ESG from the SEC vocabulary.
Like last most of his team would be in jail or hate him and find him incompetentJUST IN: Trump would consider Ken Paxton for US AG if he wins in November
“I would, actually,” Trump said when asked if he would consider Paxton.
LMAO. Trump is a master troll. I seriously doubt Trump would consider Paxton for the AG position but it's fun to think about. Democrats wouldn't just meltdown, they would lose their ever loving minds and make the BLM riots look like child's play.
Ah, yes, Peter Navarro, the great libertarian economic theorist who teamed up with the equally great classic libertarian creator of MAGA to instigate the non-authoritarian one man trade war with the world, creating havoc on international trade agreements that had taken decades to develop, causing hundreds if not thousands of small Midwest farmers to go bankrupt and have to sell to big corporation farm operations, hundreds if not thousands of small manufacturing companies to close shop laying off thousands of employees, yes, that great classic libertarian team. But don’t think for one minute what they did was authoritarian. No, that was classic libertarian policy based on individual liberty in action. And, no, it was not 1984, we’re way past 1984. How do we know it was classic libertarianism at its finest and not authoritarianism? Why @OrangeTuono has told us so, and if anyone on this board knows his classic libertarian philosophy it’s him. So of course Navarro deserves back on Trump’s team. Hell, let’s get John Bolton back while we’re at it. He can join with Nikki Haley, who Trump welcomed into the fold recently, and good old Mike Pompeo to form his new classic libertarian foreign policy team. And don’t think they’re NeoCon warmongers, that would be an error, they’re classic libertarians one and all. Viva Maga!
As opposed to those other trade agreements that lead to the destruction of Detroit and the entire "Rust" belt. I'm not a proponent of Navarro, but I have to call you out on your selective amnesia regarding "international trade agreements that had taken decades to develop".
