When he’s re-elected,does the resistance scream at the sky some more?
When he’s re-elected,does the resistance scream at the sky some more?
Due to the insanely high ratio of sexual harassment/rape allegations against Democrats compared to Republicans. this seems like a very odd time to post something like this. It's almost as if you live in an alternate reality than the rest of the world.
Just the recent ones... A 13:1 ratio. But remember, you're the one that asked.Have that ratio handy?
Most of those aren't politicians?
Where did I state that the ratio was about politicians? Reading is not one of your strengths, eh?
What I stated was basically that a Democrat shouldn't be throwing stones at glass houses. Of course, you think that a 13:1 ratio is a "slight" difference, so math doesn't seem to be your strong suit, either. Are you sure that you're not a Democrat? Your intelligence level would imply otherwise.Given that you were responding to a satirical post strictly about a political party and politicians...
What I stated was basically that a Democrat shouldn't be throwing stones at glass houses. Of course, you think that a 13:1 ratio is a "slight" difference, so math doesn't seem to be your strong suit, either. Are you sure that you're not a Democrat? Your intelligence level would imply otherwise.
Sarcasm... The classic rebuttal when someone has lost an argument. Should have seen it coming. Kudos.Thank you for your scientific, well-researched, unbiased ratio. I am in your debt.
They will be scromiting.When he’s re-elected,does the resistance scream at the sky some more?
Sarcasm... The classic rebuttal when someone has lost an argument. Should have seen it coming. Kudos.
I see that someone sure got their panties in a bunch after looking like an imbecile. A little angry. Yeah, you're not a Democrat. There's a huge ocean right outside of Nebraska too.1.I was never arguing with you. At no point was this anything close to an argument.
2. You claimed to have knowledge of an "insanely high ratio". I asked for that ratio, with no sense of irony or sarcasm, but because I assumed you actually had a real, statistic driven ratio.
3. You gave me that ratio. I realized it was not rooted in research, but rather you grabbing names out of the news.
4. I questioned the methodology of that ratio given that you have opened it up to celebrities and others associated with Hollywood, which of course has more people associated with the Democratic Party than Republican Party. Again, your methodology to come up with that ratio seems flawed to me. Are you going to research common criminals in prison and look up their political affiliations? I think you should if you want an accurate ratio if we're moving past elected officials, which I assumed your ratio was referring to, and perhaps, like you stated, I made an incorrect assumption.
5. YOU rolled your eyes at ME (emoji-wise) when I asked for this ratio and then you produced what is not anything close to a scientific ratio. So, I threw in some sarcasm. Prior to that, I was genuinely interested if you had that ratio of sexual assault charges leveled against elected officials in the last few years.
6. Get the stick out of your ass and don't be so sensitive when someone asks you a question when you claim something on a message board.
And for good measure, I have never voted for a Democrat in a Presidential election, nor am I registered as a Democrat.
I see that someone sure got their panties in a bunch after looking like an imbecile. A little angry. Yeah, you're not a Democrat. There's a huge ocean right outside of Nebraska too.
When he’s re-elected,does the resistance scream at the sky some more?