Trump is going to win going away in 2020
- Thread starter tlwwake
- Start date
The political rival was part of the 2016 corruption via the Obama administration - of which he was vice president. Does Biden get immunity simply because he's one of a dozen hopeful democrats now? Absurd.
You..... really need to read more of his posts. This is absolutely impeccably on point self branding. You don't get deep conversations with him. No idea where this expectation of yours comes from.
Eh, undoubtedly at its daily volume, many understand it as a lotto.
***Edit: or a potential high percentage mover for scalping. <--- Likelier scenario given aforementioned volume.
But, to your point, smart money, afraid of debt, got out a while ago. Hence where CHK is today.
Lots of explaining for situation that is purported to have no evidence of high crimes
No need, I already know I'm dealing with the shoot someone on 5th avenue crowd
How does a Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation that says "not a transcript, just a summary" become a verbatim transcript? More Trump magic?
Really or is that how it’s being portrayed by Democrats? Since you were not in the room, you didn’t see video and you do not have access to the transcripts you know nothing but what Democrats want you to know. Do you enjoy being manipulated?
In any case, DJT is on super thin ice today. So many things have to go to his advantage for fundamentals to turn to his favor that I think the OP is expressing his desire, not a dispassionate analysis.
Having said that, no one misplays a good hand better than the Democrats.
Having said that, no one misplays a good hand better than the Democrats.
I get that the left is using this as something to get Trump on but do you really think we give billions of dollars to foreign countries without expecting something in return?
Then you have to explain how quid pro quo is a crime. Is it because it is a "wink wink, nod nod" agreement rather than one in written form with the consideration expressly specified? I'm just a simple transactional attorney, so you'll need to help me with this criminal law stuff.
Why don’t we ask Obama, he sent millions in cash in the middle of the night.
We all know that Hunter Biden being hired to that board right after Biden was named to be the point person on Ukraine is purely coincidental. There's a big demand for
I agree that the US should not demand that any corruption involving
Is it your position that trading release of funding for investigation of a political rival is not impeachable?
Hypothetically if direct evidence supports that claim, would you support impeachment?
If Dems were sooooo confident in the evident, they wouldn't be doing a preliminary closed door investigation.
They would take a vote and actually do it the right way. This is garbage... similar to Russia investigation.
They would take a vote and actually do it the right way. This is garbage... similar to Russia investigation.
Don't know. That's why I'm trying to understand if there is a crime under pilt's hypothetical since there has to be a crime for impeachment.
(Also, wondering if every politician is off limits from investigation. Isn't every politician a political rival to any other politician?)
My position is that the crime in question, even if it occurred to the degree specified by Dems, which I don't believe occurred, does not warrant impeachment proceedings. If it did, then no president of either party would last 6 months.
One could argue that Obama committed equivalent quid pro quo deals in secretly returning the billions up Iran or in the funding of anti-nethanyu parties in Israel's elections. Also, just because it is a personal benefit for Trump to have Biden investigated does not preclude it from also being a US benefit which is the criteria for an allowed conversation.
I think even Joe Biden is with in limits if it follows proper DOJ procedures.
How many non political rivals has DJT conditioned foreign aid appropriated by congress upon?
Is DJT leading the charge on the Epstein investigation with this much zeal and gusto?
Do those companies have concerns about bringing in sufficient revenue to service the debt?
So you are saying debt concerns require context?
Debt didn't kill CHK, piss poor capital allocation did.
No idea. Will you be replying with the relevant crime? Just want to know if I should check back in this thread tonight.
You're gonna need to lend your fortune telling abilities to the rest of humanity.
But, slight of hand noted.
I just sit around until some one says "how many wells should we drill at a loss?" and I simply say "zero."
Soliciting foreign assistance with a political campaign is a crime. Foreign entities providing anything of value to a campaign is a crime.
If the dots connect, "Trump will release funds" if "Ukraine publicly announces a Biden investigation", would you believe the president has committed a crime?
BTW: High crimes and misdemeanors is the criteria - that means just about anything. Doesn't necessarily have to be an actual crime. As well, the Senate can choose to find an impeached official innocent without regard to the actual facts of the case - there is no appeal process. The Senates decision is final.
