the dossier / collusion / surveillance stories explained
- Thread starter HanAholeSolo2.0
- Start date
What are we going to do about them? I mean, the Bots are pretty much responsible for everything. Have they taken your 30 guns or are those still safe?
We can be sure of one thing in all this bot mess.
If libs are accusing people of it.
They’ve already implemented and perfected it x100.
Surprised you don’t give Trump more credit for his approach.
This actually is the most inaccurate thing you've said and is sadly the opposite of reality. It accurately points out how the DNC and HRC were simply outsmarted by Russia and CA, though. From an objective, American, patriotic, somewhat loyal democrat perspective, it's unforgivable and the HRC coronation and Clinton coronation made this possible. Smart political killers in 2016 weren't emailing risotto recipes. Russia honed in on the most feeble-minded segment of the electorate and HRC was too mentally constipated and sick and arrogant to stop it. In hindsight, a POTUS-caliber candidate should should have been a generation ahead of what happened, it was already predicted in congressional gossip transcripts on the Wa Po. based on what had already occurred in Europe. So does Biff get credit for doing the micro-targeted, bot propaganda thing? I don't know, did he collude?
Since 1992 Presidential elections have been 8 year exercises in backlash. I'm wondering what the next one will look like.
No it’s true.
Why do you think the left freaked out over Candace Owens anti-bullying software?
“You’re going to ruin everything.”
Because the left makes up fake accounts pretending to be racist whites and then bully fellow liberals.
If the left is accusing you of it.
They are already doing it.
Move along, nothing to see here. Adrienne and the swamp are one and the same:
I don't recall this thread having anything to do with "bodacious ta-ta's", but thanks for tittying it up!
Just commenting on my lack of success trying to hold a beach ball much less two of them under water for any length of time.I don't recall this thread having anything to do with "bodacious ta-ta's", but thanks for tittying it up!
I think we all recognize the futility of debating certain posters that lack the ability to objectively gather and evaluate facts, Rep. Ponzi.
i hope trump has the wherewithal to move these players towards trials
quiet retirement, re-assignment and or "promotion" aren't going to cut it
the big pfffft of the porn slut dragging the donald under the bus has to have the otards and his ilk pacing
quiet retirement, re-assignment and or "promotion" aren't going to cut it
the big pfffft of the porn slut dragging the donald under the bus has to have the otards and his ilk pacing
Scroll through this thread about General Flynn.
[click link below and scroll down --- highly suggested]
[click link below and scroll down --- highly suggested]
Completely true. And freaking hilarious.
Which narrative are we going with? Russia supported Trump or not?
I don't know about collusion and what does the dossier have to do with anything?
it was addressed in the op to the thread to which you are replying. read it and educate yourself.
Hahahahahaha! Russian Bot Hysteria!!!! The Bots!!!! The Bots!!! The Bots!!!! They're Everywhere!
Responses to that tweet are golden. What a bunch of rubes.
"TEA PAIN WAS BORN THOMAS ELMER ADDISON PAIN ON JULY 4TH, 1976 IN COOTER CREEK, ARKANSAS."
https://teapainusa.wordpress.com
But then a little reality sinks in...
Hahahahahaha!
And the first one, Nancy Paulson, looks like a bot! Every time... She even looks to have another duplicate bot account under the same name, posting the same crap.
Well, they're not Rep. Ponzi, but most of those are in fact... BOTS!
While acknowledging that you could care less about accurate information, there's a tool you can use that will give you a pretty good idea if one of your propaganda sources is a bot.
...we identified accounts with certain suspicious behavior as high-confidence bot accounts. Behavior such as tweeting every few minutes in a full day, endorsing polarizing political propaganda (including fake news), obtaining a large follower account in a relatively small time span, and constant retweeting/promoting other high-confidence bot accounts are all traits that lead to high-confidence bot accounts. These are the accounts that we aim to classify and bring to the attention of the Twitter community.
More fake news:
Russian bots on Twitter retweeted President Trump hundreds of thousands of times during the last months of his presidential campaign, Twitter told Congress.
The company revealed to lawmakers on Thursday that the Russian-linked accounts had retweeted Trump nearly 470,000 times from Sept. 1 to Nov. 15, 2016. The accounts retweeted Hillary Clinton less than 50,000 times during the same timeframe.
thehill.com/policy/technology/technology/371059-twitter-russian-bots-retweeted-trump-nearly-500000-times-in-last
