The Dems can rejoice, they finally got Trump.

[Headhunter]

Two years and 30 mil later they've got him on two campaign violations for paying women not to talk about sex. Never mind some legal people say that's not a crime and if this is his standard operating method prior to running for president it's not a crime. Others point out you can't indict a sitting President so there's that and lastly, most of these types of violations are settled with a fine but they'll do their damnedest to make sure Trump gets punished worse than others.

Meanwhile you have the crime operation known as the Clinton foundation and a sitting Secretary of State openly soliciting donations to the foundation in exchange for favorable treatment and no special prosecutor and a DOJ loaded with Obma/Clinton cronies that won't do their jobs.

Thank God they got Trump, he is up there with serial killers. Anyone violating campaign finance laws needs to be nailed to a cross just like all those before Trump.

 

[Syskatine]

Two years and 30 mil later they've got him on two campaign violations for paying women not to talk about sex. Never mind some legal people say that's not a crime and if this is his standard operating method prior to running for president it's not a crime. Others point out you can't indict a sitting President so there's that and lastly, most of these types of violations are settled with a fine but they'll do their damnedest to make sure Trump gets punished worse than others.

Meanwhile you have the crime operation known as the Clinton foundation and a sitting Secretary of State openly soliciting donations to the foundation in exchange for favorable treatment and no special prosecutor and a DOJ loaded with Obma/Clinton cronies that won't do their jobs.

Thank God they got Trump, he is up there with serial killers. Anyone violating campaign finance laws needs to be nailed to a cross just like all those before Trump.

You could always wait and see what Mueller's evidence is before you pass judgment.

I'll stipulate up front though that no matter what, you'll defend Biff and try to explain it away.

Won't you?

 

[Headhunter]

You could always wait and see what Mueller's evidence is before you pass judgment.

I'll stipulate up front though that no matter what, you'll defend Biff and try to explain it away.

Won't you?

You've found him guilty before you've seen the evidence? What's the difference?

No matter what you'll always think he's guilty. Hypocrite is what you're called.

 

[Syskatine]

You've found him guilty before you've seen the evidence? What's the difference?

No matter what you'll always think he's guilty. Hypocrite is what you're called.

Guilty of what?

 

[MegaPoke]

Guilty of what?

You always call him a criminal. Kinda seems like it’s up to you to elaborate.

 

[Syskatine]

You always call him a criminal. Kinda seems like it’s up to you to elaborate.

The safe answer is obstruction of justice. He's done that before our eyes.

 

[MegaPoke]

The safe answer is obstruction of justice. He's done that before our eyes.

How? Of what?

 

[Pokeabear]

How? Of what?

Attempting and failing to fully obstruct justice is still a crime. Same as attempting and failing to rob a bank, even if all you did was plan it and never went through with it, it’d still be a crime.

 

[MegaPoke]

How did he obstruct or attempt to?

 

[Pokeabear]

How did he obstruct or attempt to?

I’m not recounting nearly two years of open obstruction, I’m satisfied with what Mueller is doing and where he is going. Obstruction of Justice will be one of the charges/Articles of Impeachment irregardless of our thoughts or feelings.

 

[Alpha Poke]

Stoping a coup obstruction.

Who knew?

 

[MegaPoke]

View embedded media

I’m not recounting nearly two years of open obstruction, I’m satisfied with what Mueller is doing and where he is going. Obstruction of Justice will be one of the charges/Articles of Impeachment irregardless of our thoughts or feelings.

Your opinion notwithstanding, it’s far from clear where obstruction has taken place. Firing Comey obviously didn’t impede the investigation.

You can’t recount 2 years of open obstruction. It’s not that you won’t.

Also I have no doubt that the House Democrats will waste political capital on an impeachment adventure which will die in the senate and secure Trump’s reelection, but that still doesn’t prove obstruction.

 

[Headhunter]

You do realize the President can fire anyone in his administration for any reason.

The President literally can not obstruct justice by exercising his legal athority. Regardless of his motives.

He can fire Mueller tomorrow and he would not be commiting a crime.

Liberals are morons about obstruction.

 

[Rdcldad]

Also I have no doubt that the House Democrats will waste political capital on an impeachment adventure which will die in the senate and secure Trump’s reelection, but that still doesn’t prove obstruction.

are house dems that smart?

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

You do realize the President can fire anyone in his administration for any reason.

The President literally can not obstruct justice by exercising his legal athority. Regardless of his motives.

He can fire Mueller tomorrow and he would not be commiting a crime.

Liberals are morons about obstruction.

It’s interesting to see where your boundaries for staying above the law fall in regards to trump, as opposed to, say, Obama.

Moving the goalposts again lol

 

[osu_orangestreak]

You guys are gonna ride the Titanic to the bottom.

 

[MegaPoke]

are house dems that smart?

I wouldn’t bet much on anyone in congress being terribly smart.