Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't see how they can present and defend their case without committing all sorts of perjury.If there are two less impressive individuals than Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler I haven't seen them.
El lol, the confidence in here is just sky high.
You repeat the talking points well enough. Pray tell, when did bribery become a federal crime? Was it after the constitution was written? Years later even? When was the Department of Justice founded? You don’t need a crime to be impeached, abuse of power is enough in and of itself.Yes the confidence is high. The House not only didn't prove their case, they don't even accuse him of a crime.
You repeat the talking points well enough. Pray tell, when did bribery become a federal crime? Was it after the constitution was written? Years later even? When was the Department of Justice founded? You don’t need a crime to be impeached, abuse of power is enough in and of itself.
You repeat the talking points well enough. Pray tell, when did bribery become a federal crime? Was it after the constitution was written? Years later even? When was the Department of Justice founded? You don’t need a crime to be impeached, abuse of power is enough in and of itself.
Bribery?You repeat the talking points well enough. Pray tell, when did bribery become a federal crime? Was it after the constitution was written? Years later even? When was the Department of Justice founded? You don’t need a crime to be impeached, abuse of power is enough in and of itself.
You repeat the talking points well enough. Pray tell, when did bribery become a federal crime? Was it after the constitution was written? Years later even? When was the Department of Justice founded? You don’t need a crime to be impeached, abuse of power is enough in and of itself.
Nothing but the majority of the House of Representatives.Evidently literally nothing is required to impeach. Just witness-less accusations of non crimes seems to be plenty.
That’s going to be an expensive asterisk son.
You wanted a crime. I gave bribery as an example of a crime. You don’t need a crime to impeach. End of story.You are living proof that if the MSM regurgitates something enough the sheep will believe. The House is trying to impeach Trump for abusing power and obstructing Congress neither of which he did, nor did the House come close to proving he committed either. No where is bribery mentioned in the impeachment charges. And speaking of bribery what did the Founding Fathers mean by bribery?
You wanted a crime. I gave bribery as an example of a crime. You don’t need a crime to impeach. End of story.
It’s on national security grounds. I wish you would read the facts but it’s too late for most.Don't you mean Democrats don't need a crime? In every impeachment in history, a President was accused of committing a crime. Yet here Democrats are trying to ram through an impeachment on strictly party lines because they do not like Trump.
Just like with the nuclear option in the Senate this will come back to haunt Democrats in the future, all to the detriment of the country. I hope you are proud.
The first Article of impeachment is as follows and very clearly describes bribery.
ARTICLE I: ABUSE OF POWER
The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment" and that the President "shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors". In his conduct of the office of President of the United States—and in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed—Donald J. Trump has abused the powers of the Presidency, in that:
Using the powers of his high office, President Trump solicited the interference of a foreign government, Ukraine, in the 2020 United States Presidential election. He did so through a scheme or course of conduct that included soliciting the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations that would benefit his reelection, harm the election prospects of a political opponent, and influence the 2020 United States Presidential election to his advantage. President Trump also sought to pressure the Government of Ukraine to take these steps by conditioning official United States Government acts of significant value to Ukraine on its public announcement of the investigations. President Trump engaged in this scheme or course of conduct for corrupt purposes in pursuit of personal political benefit. In so doing, President Trump used the powers of the Presidency in a manner that compromised the national security of the United States and undermined the integrity of the United States democratic process. He thus ignored and injured the interests of the Nation.
President Trump engaged in this scheme or course of conduct through the following means:
(1) President Trump—acting both directly and through his agents Within and Outside the United States Government?corruptly solicited the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations into—
(A) a political opponent, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden,; and
(B) a discredited theory promoted by Russia alleging that Ukraine—rather than Russia—interfered in the 2016 United States Presidential election.
(2) With the same corrupt motives, President Trump—acting both directly and through his agents within and outside the United States Government—conditioned two official acts on the public announcements that he had requested—
(A) the release of $391 million of United States taxpayer funds that Congress had appropriated on a bipartisan basis for the purpose of providing vital military and security assistance to Ukraine to oppose Russian aggression and which President Trump had ordered suspended; and
(B) a head of state meeting at the White House, which the President of Ukraine sought to demonstrate continued United States support for the Government of Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression.
(3) Faced with the public revelation of his actions, President Trump ultimately released the military and security assistance to the Government of Ukraine, but has persisted in openly and corruptly urging and soliciting Ukraine to undertake investigations for his personal political benefit.
These actions were consistent with President Trump's previous invitations of foreign interference in United States elections.
In all of this, President Trump abused the powers of the Presidency by ignoring and injuring national security and other vital national interests to obtain an improper personal political benefit. He has also betrayed the Nation by abusing his high office to enlist a foreign power in corrupting democratic elections.
Wherefore President Trump, by such conduct, has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to national security and the Constitution if allowed to remain in office, and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with self-governance and the rule of law. President Trump thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.
The irony.Thank you for proving how much of a sheep you are.
Nothing but the majority of the House of Representatives.
It’s on national security grounds. I wish you would read the facts but it’s too late for most.
To get a more fair trial. So far it’s worked.And yet they sat on this clear and present danger for a month.
pictured, you.
If there are two less impressive individuals than Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler I haven't seen them.
Thank you for proving how much of a sheep you are.
Trump supporters.What’s the biggest danger to your liberty?
Subjugation of our democracy to foreign interests.How so?
Trump supporters.
Subjugation of our democracy to foreign interests.
Trump supporters.