www.mediaite.com
“I agree…it’s a false equivalency, Russell”Russell Brand Obliterates MSNBC as ‘Propaganda’ in Soul-Searing Rant — Right to MSNBC Analyst’s Face
Russell Brand eviscerated MSNBC as "propaganda" and a corporate "mouthpiece" in a fiery diatribe right at MSNBC analyst John Heilemann's face.
Short clip worth the watch.
Might as well just say you are an easily manipulated moron.
As opposed to taking anything of Russell’s Brand with a truckload of margarita salt??? lol
Because they haven't filed their rebuttal brief yet.
You would have credibility if you would counter Brand’s argument rather than dismiss it because you don’t like the man making it. Have you heard the phrase “argue the argument?” Try doing that occasionally and you might have a more receptive audience. As it is very few of us take you seriously (as you should be able to tell by the replies to your non-responsive comments).
Brand did not defend Fox in that clip. He told the NBC guy that his network is just as biased as Fox, and it is ludicrous that he pretends otherwise. You’re making a straw man argument. If you want to argue against what Brand actually said I’d like to hear it.
What are you talking about? Brand pointed to two instances of ongoing and overt and prejudicial reporting by NBC while Heilemann tried to drown him out by shouting over him.
Did you watch the video? Heilemann challenged him to name one instance then tried to run out the clock by talking nonstop. As anyone who knows Russell Brand would tell you he is not the type to allow that to happen. He was asked for one instance and he gave two, virtually the whole time Heilemann was trying to shout over him. Maher agreed with Brand, then tried to play a peacemaker as the discussion got loud and the time slot was coming to a close.
MSNBC is the shining beacon of journalistic integrity according to dumbass. Might as well try talking to a brick wall. It has a higher IQ but it's not as much fun humiliating.
Here is how this works with out local left operatives.
You’re right, I should have said Maher agreed he thought it was a false equivalency. Then he basically shut his yap and watched Brand clean the floor with Heilemann as Maher’s always-prejudiced audience cheered wildly for Brand’s comments, and the last thing he wanted was to disagree with his own audience. One thing, Clinton, throughout this entire dialog you have not made one cogent rebuttal to anything Brand had to say. You almost never do on any thread or any topic. That’s the main reason no one pays any serious attention to anything you say.
Huh? You don’t know? I thought you knew everything, being a calculus wizard and all.
