Registered Democrat??Are these fake news/photo shops?
- Thread starter CowboyUp
- Start date
you constantly complain about name calling. yet you constantly without intellectual pause call people names.
When your only last resort play because you’ve been owned is weak trolling, I’m gonna call you an idiot:
1) because you’ve been owned and can’t stand it and had to go there first, and,
2) you’re an idiot.
Don’t like the truth? Do better...a lot better.
Carry on.
Interesting. what qualifies you to judge another man’s intellect? is yours provably exceptional?
Bring him back soon. I enjoy (J)uggernaut (D)ick. He's my favorite. Hopelessly combative, even to his own grandma...
I legitimately hate that bitch.
Lol.
Carry on.
Well, first let's get in the same world of facts. What do you contend is the deadliest school shooting in history, and what gun? God only knows what you're factual narrative will be.
I'll also preemptively tell you that whatever was used, if it gets to be a problem with kids getting killed while working on geometry, I'll consider mass action to prevent it. If it's paperclips, I'd consider banning paper clips. The objective isn't consistency with some ideology, the objective is to prevent a cruel imbecile from deciding which child gets to live or die.
Well of course. Characterizing these as "either/or" propositions or competing objectives is your narrative, not mine.
I don't know -- at least take a look. You ask a broad question. Depends on the problem and solution. It depends on lots of things. I'd at least want to take an objective look, wouldn't you? I think it's harder to just go buy a truck load of ammonium nitrate now, but it's not banned. They found a solution that works in that case.
Wel, thoughts on the last few years of people simply using vehicles to plow through crowds of people? Don’t you think killers will just kill? Do you think the AR made this asshole kill?
Own it Clinton. It's yours, all yours. Deflection only makes you look like a liar.
I’d like to have about 10-12 tons of ammonium nitrate for the upcoming growing season. But there’s none available for at least 100 miles. Why would I want this particular type of fertilizer? Because of less evaporative loss of nitrogen when applied in warmer temperatures.
Why is it not available? Because nobody (or almost nobody) wants to hassle with the government forms and checks required to transport and sell it.
I understand the reason why. But I want you to understand that I’m being punished for what one asshole did a couple of decades ago by using something for other than its intended purpose.
Eat another scoop of shit, Tim, as you rot in hell.
I don’t know. Those that have plowed through crowded markets with vehicles were pretty efficient.
The point is, banning scary looking guns won’t make evil people not kill. This dude was ****ed up and was going to kill. The only way to have prevented it would have been to intercept him before (which was possible in this case but the FBI failed).
That he’s even with us now for that liberal guy who shot up the Republican baseball practice last year.
No surprise there.
So what about Trump and MAGA resonated so much with this killer?
I’m not advocating for gun control per se, but compare the number of terrorist deaths or mass killings via the use of cars versus the use of guns and I don’t believe this is a fair comparison. Guns are much more efficient for mass deaths than cars for many reasons...including the ability to put in physical barriers to keep vehicles out that aren’t readily available to apply to guns.
I also don’t believe that the ONLY way to lower the number of deaths from mass events is to catch them before. Law enforcement is limited to seizing people when there is probable cause that they are going to commit such an act....unless you’re willing to alter our First Amendment rights. If the FBI had made contact with this guy (based upon the social media postings I have seen attributed to him), it’s likely IMO that they would not have had enough evidence to convict him of anything. His threats were non-specific and general. Concerning and possibly justification for a mental health referral sure, but probably not sufficient to arrest and charge with anything. Until we develop failsafefuture crime predicting abilities that are deemed sufficient to seize a person, the nature of law enforcement is necessarily reactive once a crime is committed much more than it is proactive.
Do you believe the recent rise in white nationalist participation has no logical connection to the election of a man with an ultranationalist agenda?
What about Democrats so resonated with the congressional shooter?
I’d ask this question of more relevance...what was it about the Freedom Caucus he didn’t like?
That question isn’t any more relevant than the one asked by sys and the correspondingly mirrored question by Viking.
Your question, in fact, leans towards implying that he had a point and blaming the victim.
not really. not in the sense you are implying anyway.
ultra nationalist was a New York liberal until suddenly he was literally hitler.
Well, he did have an assasination list in his pocket, and the entire list was Freedom caucus members. But yes, I’m victim blaming that’s it JD. Brilliant summation counselor lol.
Carry on.
New York liberal who intentionally kept blacks out of his apartments and was sued for housing discrimination because of it.
You went from what about Democrats attracted him to what is it about Freedom Caucus members that made him hate them enough to kill them.
That is exceedingly close to victim blaming by implication.
I know you see that. I know everyone else sees that too.
I’m glad the idiot’s dead. It doesn’t take away from the fact that Freedom Caucus policy pisses people off lol. Should it piss them off enough to commit domestic terrorism? No, and I never can close to saying that and you know it so stop the BS reach haha.
Carry on.
Well then, what relevance does what he hated about the freedom caucus have to the discussion?
None.
Carry on.
