ADVERTISEMENT

Redacted transcript

MegaPoke

Moderator
Moderator
May 29, 2001
58,292
56,071
113
54
Tulsa
www.shipmanphotos.com
weak shit. If I were in ISIS I would be laughing my ass off and the takeaway would be that this administration is so weak they can't even say the name of who everyone on Earth knows did this because they are afraid.

Best recruiting material yet.
 
weak shit. If I were in ISIS I would be laughing my ass off and the takeaway would be that this administration is so weak they can't even say the name of who everyone on Earth knows did this because they are afraid.

Best recruiting material yet.

May be something a little more to it than that.
 
May be something a little more to it than that.

I'm sure.

But to summarize, our president and his minions in response to an ISIS terrorist attack have:

1. In no way retaliated against Isis
2. Blamed the 2nd amendment
3. Undermined the 1st amendment with this redacted transcript that insults the intelligence of anyone who has followed the story.
4. Refuses to even describe the enemy's ideology. Yes it's important.
5. Perpetuated the home grown lone wolf hate crime mass shooting angle.

This Barack Hussein Obama guy is something much worse than a shitty president.
 
And without the actual audio, as we've seen plenty of times with this lying administration, there's zero reason to believe the "redacted" transcript is anything close to what the actual audio says.

Even the French had the balls to at least throw down some good old fashioned ass-whip-by-bombing after their attack. But Brokeback Shitstain? Still diddling his butthole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Read this yesterday and thought of the doctored tape, from 911, played by the media when George Z shot the rodent in chief's "son." Boy no one, including the justice department, had a problem condemning the "white Hispanic" for that........truth be damned.

This administration is so full of shit, the whole dam lot. Can't believe anyone takes them serious.....yes please obysmal and Justice Department, protect us from even having to think, just lay out the synthesized facts as you want them to be laid out, we don't need to analyze or think for ourselves.
 
His were put on the internet, did the government beat the press and enterprising citizens to discovery of his website? A quick google search doesn't indicate the government directed the press to it.
 
What does that change exactly? No government entity, local, state or federal to my knowledge had a chance to keep Roof's statements from the press because the press discovered those statements first.

If he had called the Orlando Sentinel the parallel would be there.
 
The DOJ had the same authority to squelch the internet postings of Roof as they did a local 911 dispatch recording.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT