RBG?
- Thread starter MegaPoke
- Start date
I fail to remember any circling-vultures rhetoric by a “lib” in here concerning a conservative judge or politician in the latter years of their life and/or deteriorating health.
Would be more than happy to be shown I’m wrong...and I’d be just as disappointed in their own opinion. I just don’t recall such an instance ***shrugs shoulders***
Fact is, if she died in her sleep right now, many cons would be high fiving and pumping fists instead of remembering and celebrating the life of a great American, who happened to be on the good side of court decisions advancing personal liberty, rights of privacy and many other virtues conservatives claim to hold the moral high ground on.
Maybe implied grim?
But I agree with you. It would be nice to have some verification that's she is competent and capable of being a supreme court justice as opposed to being hidden away. Even a video chat showing her from her home would go a long way.
But I agree with you. It would be nice to have some verification that's she is competent and capable of being a supreme court justice as opposed to being hidden away. Even a video chat showing her from her home would go a long way.
You would be wrong. Our very own @Syskatine did just that. I bumped a thread of his a few months back when he was going by a different name.
Have you called yourself out for posting that you'd celebrate Trump's assassination? It's hilarious watching you trying to get all uppity while dragging that ship anchor around.
Nope...and never will either. He deserved a bullet in his head long before he ever became a president ***shrugs shoulders***
So if we don't like RBG, then we are allowed to wish her ill? Is that the standard you are proposing?
There’s a remarkably wide divergence between the character and moral stature of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Donald J. Trump.
The real question is who hates Trump enough to hope for a bullet in the head, but likes Scalia enough to chastise people for dancing on his grave?
In your opinion. You are an atheist and consciously wish you were aborted. Not everyone else feels that way about abortion. You aren’t open minded enough to see the difference.
***still thinks New York is allowing late term abortions of healthy viable fetuses***
I’m talking about Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s views on abortion being viewed as worse than anything trump has done. Some people see abortion as a little more than a character flaw.
I’m not expressing an opinion, just pointing out that you people always assume your opinion is fact and then claim to be open minded.
What does Jesus have to do with common sense here?
- Should a woman be forced to carry a nonviable fetus to full term?
- Should a woman be forced to birth if raped?
- Should we be condoning inbreeding via incest?
- Should we be compromising the life of the mother?
What a joke toon....libs don't wait until old age they have the death wishes, lies and character assassinations upon nomination, for conservatives. Bork, C Thomas, and Kavanagh to name a few.
If she can't do her job, should resign, period. But that isn't really the government employees, stuck to the peoples tit, way.
Last edited:
I'll play. Let's limit all abortions to that criteria. You in?
Sure...
Of course, in those circumstances, you now have drug abuse parents birthing kids with birth defects and you now have far more economically nonviable parents forced to give kids up for adoption and placed into the care of the government (I.e. on the teet).
Unintended consequences and all...
I believe they are, but also know abortion will never be outlawed. With those terms 90%+ of abortions don't occur.
The statements of official representatives of the Supreme Court and the fact that her clerks are actually working with her aren’t good enough for you?
There is a process for removing incompetent Justices should Congress deem it necessary.
I understand that. But there's no evidence like seeing it for yourself. Absent that, speculation happens.
No they are deep state. She needs to come to the window and wave.
Selfishly I want Trump to appoint one or maybe two more Supremes.
Supreme Court is above responding to politically motivated speculation....lifetime appointments and all that.
I get that.
I like the balance right about where it is now.
I also admire RBG as a Justice and as a person even though I rarely fully agree with her positions. I view her as an effective and valuable dissenting voice on the court....which I think is a good and valuable thing to have in the development of jurisprudence.
