PrO-LiFe
- Thread starter ClintonDavidScott
- Start date
Bless your heart. Your supposedly an attorney and you can’t see how the law leaves open the likely abuse and allows abortion up to birth for convenience? SMFH. While it may fool you it doesn’t fool me.
The text from the bill (that you hadn't read) is rather clear. Again:
(8) A prohibition on abortion at any point or points in time prior to fetal viability, including a prohibition or restriction on a particular abortion procedure.
(9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when, In the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant patient's life or health.
This text aligns with your own position, as stated earlier on this thread:
No where in this bill does it state that all abortions must be allowed up to birth. Your assertion that Democrats wanted to allow abortions up to birth in this bill was misleading and false.
You have now been given the truth. Will you continue to repeat the false talking points you have been fed or will you man up for once and admit the nonsense you keep repeating is misleading and false?
Take your own advice for once . . .
Absolutely.
You support child groomers in the schools and the slaughter of children in the womb.
Not a good look.
I agree.
So what do you call forcing a child to continue with a pregnancy resulting from her rape? Say it with me. Exploiting. And despicable.
Affidavits: More pregnant minors who were raped denied Ohio abortions
Last edited:
The abortion rate and totals had consistently tracked downward for decades until the Trump administration.
WrOnG SiDe oF HiStoRY
carry on
I want to roll around in that brain that is so intelligent. Man I am so glad we are pals.
Notice not one person in this thread ever brought up the "fetus" rights. Only a male or females rights. Wait what only male and females can reproduce. But what is a female? Should women's sports only allow women who can reproduce to compete?
Show me in the US Constitution where “fetus” is mentioned. Now do the same for “born”. Then find a case beyond Laci and Conner’s Law that provides rights to the fetus.
carry on
My morals go beyond the constitution first and foremost pal. Sad statement pal and your better than that mankind is better than that.
Sexist.
I just want the same ability to head off inconvenience or a poor financial decision.
Clinton ever lost his V card? Oh I am kidding pal I love ya. You man whore out there killing your offspring I mean dna I mean fetus.
Similar threads
