No thanks you can keep it in your pants.......... if you want.No, info was good and very basic.
I'll use smaller concepts for you in the future.
No thanks you can keep it in your pants.......... if you want.No, info was good and very basic.
I'll use smaller concepts for you in the future.
No thanks you can keep it in your pants.......... if you want.
Doesn’t surprise me that’s what comes to your mind first. Weird declarative statement, but do go on.First thing that pops into your head, dicks.
Surprise.
Does it matter which way they lean? Does freedom of the press only apply to "impartial" journos?
I have little doubt that cause driven types, the vast majority of journalist make chump change, are attracted to the career. Those folks may lean one way or another on an arbitrary belief scale. That has zero to do with the principals of a free press.
As to freedom of speech, no commerical entity is obligated to provide a forum for all speech. Period.stand on the corner and give live sermons if Facebook thinks you violate their TOS. Build your own Twitter killer app if you think you have been shadow banned.
Doesn’t surprise me that’s what comes to your mind first. Weird declarative statement, but do go on.![]()
Haha Mjolnir is never a burden, you haven’t been swallowing those red pills again have you? It’s never good to self hate, especially ones own Hammer. Learn to love yourself and turn away from Incelia.True, I was just going by my pants that sprang to your mind which do contain a dick.
I'd never assume your pants are burdened by such things.
Sub tweet, is weak. Step up, Step right up, boys and girls gather round and watch a man swing his hammer down.Oh I don't doubt it not a burden in any way.
Sub tweet, is weak. Step up.
Agree, information on the author is a good thing. Imagine such a source of info. Imagine that popped up anytime you were searching for info. If only such a thing we're possible...I was actually just asking for clarification on what you were saying.
Having said that, I do like to know the leanings of the authors so that I can try to lean the opposite way when reading it.
Presidential
Bush the revenge huh? I was referencing the current occupant. The Lowest bar I know but I aim to please.Bush II, naw, he was more eloquent.
Duerte, maybe. He's tired and not funny.
Who ya talking to?I'll never fault a person for trying.
Dont give up.
Poor babiesI'm bailing on this thread.
Yet another one that has become unreadable.