Oh dr ford what a tangled web we weave when we practice
- Thread starter HighStickHarry
- Start date
Not one word of her accusations and testimony has been corroborated by anyone. If the FBI proves different then I'll apologize.
To have her be held up as some kind of brave national hero is what is a mockery.
She and her backers have tried to destroy a man and his family with absolutely nothing but an accusation from a nut job who is also a partisan hack with an agenda. No one mentions that part of her background.
To have her be held up as some kind of brave national hero is what is a mockery.
She and her backers have tried to destroy a man and his family with absolutely nothing but an accusation from a nut job who is also a partisan hack with an agenda. No one mentions that part of her background.
Still several rungs up the ladder from Feinchangs deviousness.
it’s refreshjng to see PC kicked to the curb and political stunts called out for what they are
Nothing validates a poster quite like this seal of approval.
Shit is coming unwound today for ford. Hopefully trump pardons her.
You can make some really thick irony sauce with this irony.
I didn't even bother clicking on it. 2cents never critically evaluates anything. He justs posts the sources of his talking points.
do we have an over under set on his use of “temperament” today?
Come back when we actually see the mainstream media make a big deal out of the Juanita Broadericks of the world.
She's been ignored for a long, long time.
now denying she helped anyone with a lie detector test...looks like she needs another test! actually, not her denying but the girl who supposedly was helped is denying it.
Last edited:
Yep, the person who supposedly received assistance denies the claims.
"I have NEVER had Christine Blasey Ford, or anybody else, prepare me, or provide any other type of assistance whatsoever in connection with any polygraph exam I have taken at anytime." - Monica McLean
No doubt though that the Kavanaugh defenders-at-all-costs will continue to believe the anonymous ex-boyfriend over Ms. McLean.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...d-coach-polygraph_us_5bb4dd9be4b01470d04d963e
So an unsubstantiated claim is to be believed or not?
Last edited:
What training or experience in the questioning of alleged victims of sexual assault do you have?
I’m really interested.
Never claimed to interview assault victims but I started my career as an auditor and then has a professional recruiter/interviewer I have many hours of training on interviewing people accused of wrong doing and how to detect deception and untruthfulness through the interview process.
Of course I will defer to you, being the smartest man in every room your in and all.
So no experience in interviewing in criminal investigations or alleged crime victims.
Check.
Good. She’s a sloppy liar, worthy of mocking and hopefully, prison.
I don’t have the time or the crayons to explain this to you. So I’ll turn it over to a body language expert.
Am I casting pearls before swine by talking to you? It seems like most people here don’t bother replying to you.
Let’s try word association regarding Dr Fraud as a pathetic liar.
“Flying”
“Lie detector”
I don’t know yet honestly. I will say her willingness to testify under oath in front of the world isn’t chopped liver she opened herself up to legitimate life-changing penalties if she lied.
We’ll see what the FBI says, but I said a while back this wouldn’t matter, and even if he was disqualified Trump and Co. just rush another thru.
I'll bet you comment on areas of the law that you do not have specific professional experience handling. But lawyers, being smarter than unwashed non-lawyers know all.
I was expressing an opinion, could be right, could be wrong, but I know most therapists would agree my methodology is sound. I would get into things like eye contact, body language, deliberate voice inflections, specific memories of details vs. inability to remember other basic details or recent events but you know better than me so I won't bother.
I do comment on areas of the law I do not have professional experience in.
I also make it clear that I don’t have specific professional experience handling those areas when I do rather than claiming that I am “trained” in the area and have more expertise than I do.
That way, I don’t have to get all butt hurt when I’m called out on my claims.
Many of those things you would get into......”eye contact, body language, voice inflections, specific memories of some details vs. inability to remember other basic details”....would be wholly different for a victim of trauma vs someone being audited or in a job interview.
That’s why I asked about your actual training and experience.
In the long run, I don’t think this entire sordid affair changes one person’s mind about the the issues or changes one vote in the Senate one way or the other.
