Obamagate
- Thread starter AC_Exotic
- Start date
That’s a guy merely repeating Powell’s brief and arguments. That’s a brief advocating for a position, an exercise in persuasive argument....not a neutral evaluation of the law. Very literally just an echo in the echo chamber.
He and the brief say “only” exception....right there in his quote, right before his underlining....it says “usually”.
You don’t really need 100s of retweets of Powell’s brief presented as if it is some new thought or source to make a decision or know what arguments are being repeated. Read the brief. Read the replies when filed.
I don’t know what the ultimate result will be, but this illustrates quite strikingly why I strongly prefer original source documents over AltMedia or MSM characterizations of....anything.
Also....random Arkansas guy running for Senate is your “source” now? C’mon now. I probably could have just “who the fook is that guy” gif-ed it and called it a day.
Last edited:
Slightly amusing that these guys submitted an amicus brief....given that consideration of amicus briefs by Sullivan is one of the things being objected to Flynn's Writ App.
So me not taking your/Trump's side....actually not taking any side....speaks volumes.
Yeah, okay.....sure thing Boog.
you promote yourself is an evidence based unbiased observer
in reality you’re a cherry picker
when presidents
weaponize gubmit
spy on their opposition,
build files
the possibilities are endless
that’s lost on your commentary
and it’s not trumps side
it’s the republics side
Other language from that case he mentions and selectively cites....
----------
But as a general rule, our system “is designed around the premise that [parties represented by competent counsel] know what is best for them, and are responsible for advancing the facts and argument entitling them to relief.”...….
The party presentation principle is supple, not ironclad. There are no doubt circumstances in which a modest initiating role for a court is appropriate......
As earlier observed, see supra, at 4, a court is not hidebound by the precise arguments of counsel, but the Ninth Circuit’s radical transformation of this case goes well beyond the pale.....
We have appointed amicus curiae: to present argument in support of the judgment below when a prevailing party has declined to defend the lower court’s decision or an aspect of it, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 589 U. S. ___ (2019); Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, 588 U. S. ___ (2019); Culbertson v. Berryhill, 584 U. S. ___ (2018); Lucia v. SEC, 583 U. S. ___ (2018); Beckles v. United States, 579 U. S. ___ (2016); Welch v. United States, 577 U. S. 1098 (2016); McLane Co. v. EEOC, 580 U. S. ___ (2016); Green v. Brennan, 576 U. S. 1087 (2015); Reyes Mata v. Lynch, reported sub nom. Reyes Mata v. Holder, 574 U. S. 1118 (2015); and to address the Court’s jurisdiction to decide the question presented, Montgomery v. Louisiana, 575 U. S. 933 (2015).
-------------------
(emphasis added by me)
So that decision by the Supreme Court (US v. SINENENG-SMITH) is not as directly on point nor absolute in it's holding as suggested that Sullivan is nothing more than a rubber stamp of the dismissal.
Sure thing, Boog.
When and if Barr and the Boys have and present that evidence, I'll be all ears and eyes.
Investigate them, prosecute them, present your evidence in court, convict them. Put up or shut up. Let's get it on. Let's see what they got.
Until then, you're the one that is adhering strictly to the script you've been given.
I'm the one waiting to see the evidence be presented out in the open courts from original source instead of evaluated and interpreted for me through either the Altmedia or MSM biased lens.
this is what you brought to the thread
never mind the central piece of evidence
that the gubmit ruined a guys career over and destroyed his finances
is “missing”
replaced with an “edited” version
then we ramble off into the legal word salad
not the basis of where this case is today
i harken back to the day when you explained how investigators and prosecutors operate with no personal accountability
that’s a real problem when they’re
dirty
when they abuse their power to operate with impunity
then get to resign
Sure thing, Boog.
When and if Barr and the Boys have and present that evidence, I'll be all ears and eyes.
Investigate them, prosecute them, present your evidence in court, convict them. Put up or shut up. Let's get it on. Let's see what they got.
Until then, you're the one that is adhering strictly to the script you've been given.
I'm the one waiting to see the evidence be presented out in the open courts from original source instead of evaluated and interpreted for me through either the Altmedia or MSM biased lens.
Sure thing, Boog.
When and if Barr and the Boys have and present that evidence, I'll be all ears and eyes.
Investigate them, prosecute them, present your evidence in court, convict them. Put up or shut up. Let's get it on. Let's see what they got.
Until then, you're the one that is adhering strictly to the script you've been given.
I'm the one waiting to see the evidence be presented out in the open courts from original source instead of evaluated and interpreted for me through either the Altmedia or MSM biased lens.
i don’t think fisa abuse is any big secret
can’t wait to see your thread
now that his sons off the table
the good general
just dragging them into deeper water
it’s beautiful
the good general
just dragging them into deeper water
it’s beautiful
From my perspective. After doing considerable research, law is excruciatingly simple. Remove the politics and Sydney wins in a cakewalk. Judge Sullivan loses.
We're not dealing with classical mechanics.
We're not dealing with classical mechanics.
Thank you. I'm a tech guy and not a lawyer, but I try to apply common sense. While I lean towards Flynn's position that he's been railroaded for political reasons, I am also just watching the show with interest. I certainly don't pretend that I have any influence in this.
Here is a key point even speaking as someone that hates all “#xxxxxxGate”
“Bears all the breadcrumbs and evidence that RussiaGate never did”
“Bears all the breadcrumbs and evidence that RussiaGate never did”
Last edited:
Luckily time heals all wounds, but we will never forget the bloodshed of January 20 2017
Some posters don’t care that General Flynn is totally innocent! They only care about looking smart and act like they are better than others, including Sidney Powell. It’s hilarious! She’s seen the documents but they keep posting like they know more about this case than her. Totally partisan but hide behind carefully crafted words.
let's put her on the stand...she will scream like a mashed cat.
That’s been obvious since hey released the redacted texts.
We know who said what and what they did.
Nothing grey about it.
Once you tell a lie you have to tell more lies to cover the previous lies. All subsequent lies are more outlandish.
That's the history of the dossier in a nutshell. Great breakdown of its history on Bongino today. Highly recommend.
Sept. 17, 2015. Former Nobel Secretary Geir Lundestad admitted giving Obama the Peace Prize was a mistake.
MegaPoke, et al knew it was a mistake on the day it was awarded.
MegaPoke, et al knew it was a mistake on the day it was awarded.
Similar threads
