ADVERTISEMENT

Looks like the DOJ arrested a leaker

Medic007

Medic007

MegaPoke is insane
Sep 25, 2006
33,207
52,072
113
Reality Leigh Winner was arrested for leaking classified information to the Intercept. She held a security clearance as an employee of a government contractor. Allegedly she printed the document, one of six people who did so, and was stupid enough to send it to the media via her work email. Her mother claims she isn't political. As always, the internet sheds doubt on that, leaving Maury to say once again, "That was a lie."

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...r-called-potus-trump-piece-sht-facebook-post/
 
  • Like
Reactions: OSUIvan and GunsOfFrankEaton
Medic007 said:
I think we all know what compelled her mother to say that.
Click to expand...

Hillary's hitman?

nobody-can-cool-gun-to-the-head.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: PDT816, GunsOfFrankEaton and trapped_in_tx
And not a word here about the underlying information regarding russian election meddling and hacking.

Who do you guys think the russians were helping?
 
OKSTATE1 said:
What does being political have to do with breaking the law? Motive does not matter.
Click to expand...

Um.... Snowden called and he's confused. We still love wikileaks?

Isn't it crazy how russia was trying so hard? Why do you think those thugs and thieves were so pro-Trump?
 
I'll be curious if there are any real consequences for this. I know in my firm, we threatened the consulting agency with legal charges when one of our contractors emailed confidential data to a personal account (besides firing the contractor).
 
syskatine said:
1556.gif
Click to expand...

One of the best movies ever!

Because they thought Trump would lift the crippling Obama sanctions against Russia that haven't done anything and haven't been lifted? Just a guess.

What's your theory? I don't recall you stating one before but am interested to know if you have one.
 
Were the Russian's pro-Trump? Or were they anti-Hillary? Its not like Hillary and Putin are buds. Its not like the U.S. under the Obama administration (of which Hillary was a part of and a clear continuation of) hadn't head-butted on multiple occasions. I'm still waiting for any evidence of this so-called collusion. Given the extent of wire-tapping the NSA does, the information gathering capabilities, its strange that no real evidence has actually been presented. Innuendo? Absolutely. But either Trump has us all fooled and he is meticulously smarter than anyone gives him credit for and he's been able to hide this collusion from the smartest and most sophisticated intelligence agencies and news media in the modern world, or he's the average IQ, narcissist (and sometimes buffoon) that he appears to be, in which case, the evidence of collusion can't be found because it doesn't exist. I personally believe its the latter, but I'd love for one of our lefty friends here to post that Trump is actually smarter than he appears and has (thus far) been able to keep his transgressions hidden.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okstatefan1 and PDT816
wyomingosualum said:
One of the best movies ever!

Because they thought Trump would lift the crippling Obama sanctions against Russia that haven't done anything and haven't been lifted? Just a guess.

What's your theory? I don't recall you stating one before but am interested to know if you have one.
Click to expand...

They hate us. Ergo, get Biff elected. He's hurting the country, dividing NATO, making a mess of everything. Much cheaper and more effective way to hurt us than war: just elect Biff.
 
aix_xpert said:
Were the Russian's pro-Trump? Or were they anti-Hillary? Its not like Hillary and Putin are buds. Its not like the U.S. under the Obama administration (of which Hillary was a part of and a clear continuation of) hadn't head-butted on multiple occasions. I'm still waiting for any evidence of this so-called collusion. Given the extent of wire-tapping the NSA does, the information gathering capabilities, its strange that no real evidence has actually been presented. Innuendo? Absolutely. But either Trump has us all fooled and he is meticulously smarter than anyone gives him credit for and he's been able to hide this collusion from the smartest and most sophisticated intelligence agencies and news media in the modern world, or he's the average IQ, narcissist (and sometimes buffoon) that he appears to be, in which case, the evidence of collusion can't be found because it doesn't exist. I personally believe its the latter, but I'd love for one of our lefty friends here to post that Trump is actually smarter than he appears and has (thus far) been able to keep his transgressions hidden.
Click to expand...

The russians and biff connection are well covered in the media and were last summer. The IC was raising hell last summer. What do you expect re evidence? You have manaforte and flynn, both pretty damning. You have contradictory statements from Biff and his kids re Russian money. I heard Hannity say that same narrative last night, as if Manaforte et al was a dream.
 
aix_xpert said:
Were the Russian's pro-Trump? Or were they anti-Hillary? Its not like Hillary and Putin are buds. Its not like the U.S. under the Obama administration (of which Hillary was a part of and a clear continuation of) hadn't head-butted on multiple occasions. I'm still waiting for any evidence of this so-called collusion. Given the extent of wire-tapping the NSA does, the information gathering capabilities, its strange that no real evidence has actually been presented. Innuendo? Absolutely. But either Trump has us all fooled and he is meticulously smarter than anyone gives him credit for and he's been able to hide this collusion from the smartest and most sophisticated intelligence agencies and news media in the modern world, or he's the average IQ, narcissist (and sometimes buffoon) that he appears to be, in which case, the evidence of collusion can't be found because it doesn't exist. I personally believe its the latter, but I'd love for one of our lefty friends here to post that Trump is actually smarter than he appears and has (thus far) been able to keep his transgressions hidden.
Click to expand...

HIDDEN IT?!?! You know he fired Comey? Hidden? He's TRIED to cover it up. Hiw many people have now said Bifd tried to quash it? This am it came out he's mad at Beauregard for appointing a special counsel. They're prosecuting a leaker. How else could he try to hide it?
 
syskatine said:
The russians and biff connection are well covered in the media and were last summer. The IC was raising hell last summer. What do you expect re evidence? You have manaforte and flynn, both pretty damning. You have contradictory statements from Biff and his kids re Russian money. I heard Hannity say that same narrative last night, as if Manaforte et al was a dream.
Click to expand...

I haven't seen anything that corresponds with Flynn's actions and collusion with the Russians by Trump. I don't argue that Flynn got paid by the Russians and didn't file the appropriate paperwork. I won't argue that Trump's team didn't vet him and only hired him as a slam on Obama.

As for Manafort, what did he do wrong? He worked for the Russians as a political analyst in the past? If that's the case, then maybe the real collusion with the Russians was for Bernie. He also had a high-ranking political advisor with Russian ties. And he was the real beneficiary of the Russian hacking of the DNC letters, as they clearly showed he was being colluded against by the DNC. Heck, that same Russian had worked for Obama in '12. Given what Obama said about "getting past that election and then having more flexibility", maybe the real Russian collusion was by Obama in the '12 election. Funny, noone cared that our politicians used experienced, international political advisors in the past. Not at least until the Dems needed a narrative for their loss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okstatefan1, Rdcldad, JohnVoight and 1 other person
aix_xpert said:
And he was the real beneficiary of the Russian hacking of the DNC letters, as they clearly showed he was being colluded against by the DNC.
Click to expand...
The DNC letters didn't come out until the days before the HRC coronation at the convention. If they wanted to benefit Bernie they would have released it while people could still vote for him in the primary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen and anon_xl72qcu5isp39
syskatine said:
HIDDEN IT?!?! You know he fired Comey? Hidden? He's TRIED to cover it up. Hiw many people have now said Bifd tried to quash it? This am it came out he's mad at Beauregard for appointing a special counsel. They're prosecuting a leaker. How else could he try to hide it?
Click to expand...

He fired Comey. I forgot, only Clinton was going to be allowed to fire Comey. Comey needed firing because he managed to politicize the FBI. As for the leaks, they should be prosecuted. Although I find it interesting that again, the report shows 'potential' Russian involvement, but no linkages to Trump. Its again, innuendo and hypotheticals. But he at least hasn't called for executive privilege, so he's going to let Comey actually testify. Which puts him above Obama, who happily used it to save his buddy's ( DA Eric Holder) skin during the Fast'n'Furious investigations. As for being upset at Beauregard, I think Trump has been consistent on this facet: He's tired of the wasted time witch-hunting some "russian ghost". This special counsel simply prolongs that hunt. But being upset and running interference are two different things. The problem Trump has is that you can't prove a negative, and the media has already judged him guilty.

Btw, since you replied this way, I presume you believe Trump is smarter than he appears and has out-smarted most of Washington, all of the major intelligence agencies, and has managed to keep hidden his super-secret Russian collusion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okstatefan1
07pilt said:
The DNC letters didn't come out until the days before the HRC coronation at the convention. If they wanted to benefit Bernie they would have released it while people could still vote for him in the primary.
Click to expand...

True, but those letters have made Bernie relevant beyond 2016. Without those releases, he would be an afterthought of the Dem party. He was to be the token opposition to Hillary. But now, he is considered one of the Dem's most influential players.
 
Putin hates Hillary. He blames her personally for organizing mass protests after his 2011 election. He swore to get revenge against her.

The interesting thing is why people assume it's about Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AC_Exotic
Interesting that Winner was charged under the same statute, 18 USC 793, that the FBI investigated Hildebitch and couldn't find reason to charge her.
 
aix_xpert said:
True, but those letters have made Bernie relevant beyond 2016. Without those releases, he would be an afterthought of the Dem party. He was to be the token opposition to Hillary. But now, he is considered one of the Dem's most influential players.
Click to expand...
I disagree. His popularity with younger voters and actual policy prescriptions have made him relevant beyond 2016. The releases only made him relevant to concern trolls from the other side of the aisle.
 
syskatine said:
And not a word here about the underlying information regarding russian election meddling and hacking.
Click to expand...
One is the commission of a crime. The other is a leftist fantasy. Shouldn't be that difficult to figure out.
 
JohnVoight said:
No reasonable prosecutor would bring a case...
Click to expand...

Wouldn't that be up to a grand jury to decide?

The real issue is that prosecuting Hillary would have been a very dangerous genie to let of the bottle because she was in the middle of a presidential election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
imprimis said:
Interesting that Winner was charged under the same statute, 18 USC 793, that the FBI investigated Hildebitch and couldn't find reason to charge her.
Click to expand...


i don't know that "couldn't find reason" was the premise under witch hildecankledouchnozzle was not charged heh
 
  • Like
Reactions: windriverrange
PDT816 said:
Wouldn't that be up to a grand jury to decide?
Click to expand...

Not as I understand it. Comey's role was to provide evidence, not give opinions. Unfortunately Comey gave immunity deals out like candy in exchange for zilch and even took the further steps of destroying laptops and evidence. It was AG Lynch's job to decide if there were going to be charges brought against HRC or not. Of course that was already decided a month earlier on a tarmac...

PDT816 said:
The real issue is that prosecuting Hillary would have been a very dangerous genie to let of the bottle because she was in the middle of a presidential election.
Click to expand...

It would have been a total sh*tstorm, no doubt. Actions have consequences though. Should Hillary and her 30,000 deleted emails on an illegal server be totally forgotten about just because she was running for POTUS? Clinton Inc. has been involved in scams, murders, and everything else going on 3 decades now. For the good of the Republic, it needs to end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
syskatine said:
The russians and biff connection are well covered in the media and were last summer. The IC was raising hell last summer. What do you expect re evidence? You have manaforte and flynn, both pretty damning. You have contradictory statements from Biff and his kids re Russian money. I heard Hannity say that same narrative last night, as if Manaforte et al was a dream.
Click to expand...
So, you're saying that there's still nothing showing collusion? Any reasonable arguments? Anything other than Trump and his family having investments around the world?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
GoPokes43 said:
So, you're saying that there's still nothing showing collusion? Any reasonable arguments? Anything other than Trump and his family having investments around the world?
Click to expand...

Man ive posted a looong list of stuff. Some of it is very compelling and some is eh.

How would I know? Like I have call logs of his campaign? We'll see. At this point its like arguing who is going to win a game. Why argue? Let's see what happens. The truth will come out with a special prosecutor.

The most damning thing to me, and I've said this a half dozen times, is the clumsy coverups Biff attempts. He's like a 4 year old trying to hide something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
07pilt said:
I disagree. His popularity with younger voters and actual policy prescriptions have made him relevant beyond 2016. The releases only made him relevant to concern trolls from the other side of the aisle.
Click to expand...

I'll agree to disagree. Vanquished primary opponents (particularly those that are 70+ years old) are rarely relevant post-election. The release of the emails and nothing more has kept Bernie relevant beyond his Senate station.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

CowboyUp

Duped

Replies
2
Views
365
24/7 Politics
2012Bearcat
2
OKSTATE1

How Can the Dems Get Rid of Joe?

Replies
0
Views
578
24/7 Politics
OKSTATE1
OKSTATE1
OKSTATE1

Re-recruiting players is just part of the NCAA coaching gig these days

Replies
0
Views
569
The Corral
OKSTATE1
OKSTATE1
OKSTATE1

Poll reveals that a solid majority of Americans, including almost a third of Democrats, believe Biden isn't calling the shots in his own presidency

Replies
4
Views
1K
24/7 Politics
launch
launch
Pokeabear

A DOJ employee is accused of helping her son and the Bloods intimidate informants

Replies
20
Views
920
24/7 Politics
imprimis
imprimis
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back