ADVERTISEMENT

Living in Leftlandia

so if every sore throat requires a professional to determine if it is life threatening it seems to me like a sore throat is a legit use of an ER
An ER visit for a sore throat is a very expensive way to manage the sore throat population.

Do you think a sore throat is life threatening when you get one? Do you go to the ER for a sore throat?
 
Both have really high profit margins

They both are on the absolute cutting edge of research.

Look at GE. They were once the stalwart cash cow in medical. Their stock is at 9 bucks today.

Welch allyn, who essentially has had a monopoly on their product line and has been a family owned company for close to 100 years was forced to sell to hill rom, because they were dying.

On and on
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaPoke
Providers have more power to negotiate than ever. You have to remember that companies like mine will never get business by being more expensive. Take a group like Integris, they go out to rfp and everyone responds. It’s a highly competitive process with margin compression the result. It’s gotten to the point that we have had to walk away from deals, because we couldn’t afford to win the business.

I don’t understand your thoughts on labor either. Can you go hire a family practice doc for 150k? Probably. Is that who you’d want working on your family? Likely not. We’ve already seen nurse practitioners and physicians assistants bridge care gaps, as less expensive options for care. You have medical assistants doing things in offices that only doctors and nurses used to do. There is an absolute law of diminishing returns - if you get cheap on labor.

I’ve lived in this world my whole career. Health care is in crisis and it’s a funding issue. There are several rural hospitals that are likely to get moth balled in the next six months. These hospitals have been under multiple ownership or management groups ... yet no one has found a way to operate them profitably.

As much as you think you know - you just don’t.
Are you a distributor or manufacturer?
150k gets you a bad doctor if everyone else is offering 200k
You are right rural hospitals are a special case and need special support.
 
They both are on the absolute cutting edge of research.

Look at GE. They were once the stalwart cash cow in medical. Their stock is at 9 bucks today.

Welch allyn, who essentially has had a monopoly on their product line and has been a family owned company for close to 100 years was forced to sell to hill rom, because they were dying.

On and on
Whoa. Reality. That doesn't fly here. Only socialist ideology directed at healthcare will work here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
Are you a distributor or manufacturer?
150k gets you a bad doctor if everyone else is offering 200k
You are right rural hospitals are a special case and need special support.

I already stated above.

Okay that’s rural. Look up any of the large national idns, that are public, and check out their financials.
 
Are you a distributor or manufacturer?
150k gets you a bad doctor if everyone else is offering 200k
You are right rural hospitals are a special case and need special support.
Are you a no on a 90% capital gains tax?
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
They both are on the absolute cutting edge of research.

Look at GE. They were once the stalwart cash cow in medical. Their stock is at 9 bucks today.

Welch allyn, who essentially has had a monopoly on their product line and has been a family owned company for close to 100 years was forced to sell to hill rom, because they were dying.

On and on
check the profit margin on other research leaders in other industries (no software).
You think it is medical that is dragging down GE? Welch allyn was dying so much that they sold for 2 billion?
 
I already stated above.

Okay that’s rural. Look up any of the large national idns, that are public, and check out their financials.
Yeah distributors are in an even worse position than providers.

Just looked up HCA and they look like they are doing well.
 
check the profit margin on other research leaders in other industries (no software).
You think it is medical that is dragging down GE? Welch allyn was dying so much that they sold for 2 billion?

You really think a company that had been family owned as long as they had been sells if not under duress? Okay.

And GE has lots of problems, but medical is a pretty big boat anchor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
Yeah distributors are in an even worse position than providers.

Just looked up HCA and they look like they are doing well.

That’s one. Look up chi, chs, Providence

HCA has revenue streams others don’t. Same with humana.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
Progressive or across the board?
Across the board. Why should anyone be able to keep more than 10% of the money they make doing nothing? 10% is a good return, no? Anything more than that is just greedy. Just think of all of the socialism that could pay for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
Supplies (medical supplies, not general use ones like paper and pens and staples) (wrong BIGLY. On average this is 5% or less of budgeted expenditures and even if you bought everything at cost, it wouldn’t impact the overall by even a percent)Are you telling me that if every health provider in the US demanded a 10% reduction in the price of medical supplies from their suppliers, those suppliers would just refuse? Keep in mind it this is every provider not just the one single provider you work for. (1% of 33 trillion is still a lot of meat)
Capital equipment (medical capital equipment, not elevators or air conditioners) (please extrapolate. You mean when the government mandates you have to move X-ray from cr to dr you can just ignore it? You’d be shocked how much the capital budget has dried up as it is. It’s not like there is a bunch or pioneering technology new capital purchases. The capital purchases are mostly to replace outdated or flat out broken product. Unless you’re talking about mandated federal government items. You could have a capital freeze and not save 50 basis points)Same deal as above. But this discussion does make me wonder how the costs for depreciation of capital are allocated. Maybe JimmyBob can step in.
Labor (you have to be trolling now. Who do we cut that doesn’t hurt care?)Administration is where most of the meat is, but doctors and nurses too.
Electronic medical records (enlighten me here. It’s not like an idn goes out and just buys software. There are rfps and arduous processes to decide on what to buy. It’s competitive. When you convince me there’s a way to make a tech company sell more cheaply, I’ll maybe grant this. There is a way and it is every provider in the US hit up their software provider for a discount. Do you know what the margin is on an incremental copy of a piece of software?
Marketing (This can be zero)(it could be and your idn could go away tomorrow too Where would the patients go?

I’m telling you if the distributors unilaterally were cut by 10%, they wouldn’t be in business.

Literally everything you mention already has a competitive bidding process. You act like there are a bunch of rubes that are just ripe for swindling. Literally every commodity utilized in the medical industry is under constant and intense downward pressure. The free market is working on the supply side.

I’m ending my participation in this. You just don’t understand that world. I’m not going to try and continue to educate you.
 
I’m telling you if the distributors unilaterally were cut by 10%, they wouldn’t be in business.

Literally everything you mention already has a competitive bidding process. You act like there are a bunch of rubes that are just ripe for swindling. Literally every commodity utilized in the medical industry is under constant and intense downward pressure. The free market is working on the supply side.

I’m ending my participation in this. You just don’t understand that world. I’m not going to try and continue to educate you.
We should be discussing pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutical companies are the ones that have providers by the balls. Our own government is responsible for quite a bit of the ridiculous prices. Instead of being able to buy IV paracetamol dirt cheap from plenty of places outside the US, we're stuck buying IV Ofirmev at 10 times the cost. Why? Because of a patent and FDA regulations. Don't get me started on naloxone.
 
We should be discussing pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutical companies are the ones that have providers by the balls. Our own government is responsible for quite a bit of the ridiculous prices. Instead of being able to buy IV paracetamol dirt cheap from plenty of places outside the US, we're stuck buying IV Ofirmev at 10 times the cost. Why? Because of a patent and FDA regulations. Don't get me started on naloxone.

Totally.
 
As a "professional tourist" from 1990-May, 2003, I saw many U. S. Nationals visiting Canadian pharmacies filling prescriptions. Cheaper. I saw many, many more Canadians going south visiting U. S. doctors. My company did considerable business in Ontario and British Columbia. I've spent my share of time listening to 50,000 watt CKLW AM 800 Windsor News/Talk radio talking about health care. I don't want Canada's single pay rationed health care system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
I’m telling you if the distributors unilaterally were cut by 10%, they wouldn’t be in business.

Literally everything you mention already has a competitive bidding process. You act like there are a bunch of rubes that are just ripe for swindling. Literally every commodity utilized in the medical industry is under constant and intense downward pressure. The free market is working on the supply side.

I’m ending my participation in this. You just don’t understand that world. I’m not going to try and continue to educate you.
As a taxpayer here's what I don't like about Medicare and, of course, it could have changed since this occurred.

We contacted Medicare about getting my Dad a wheelchair. They told us they would not buy one immediately. Rather, they would pay a distributor to lease one for 13 months at $25 per month. Once the 13 months had passed and he still needed it, Medicare would purchase it for one additional month's payment. So, 14 months for $350. At the time, I could buy him the same one off the internet for less that $150.

I get calls often about being Medicare qualified for a free knee or back brace. In questioning one of the sales people, I asked what it would cost Medicare for a knee brace. I was told they would charge Medicare $600. I can buy top of the line ones off Amazon for $150 max. Of course, I could have been being bullshitted and don't need either brace since the VA has given me both for free and how many braces does a person need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
You really think a company that had been family owned as long as they had been sells if not under duress? Okay.

And GE has lots of problems, but medical is a pretty big boat anchor.
Do you think Hill-Rom buys a 2500 employee company for 2 billion if it is under duress? Sometimes people cash out if they get a good deal. The Hill Rom segment that Welch Allyn falls in had an income of 253 million off of 960 million in net revenue, that what we call in the business world "really good."

GE's healthcare division had an 18.7% profit margin in 2018, which might make it the lightest boat anchor ever.
 
Across the board. Why should anyone be able to keep more than 10% of the money they make doing nothing? 10% is a good return, no? Anything more than that is just greedy. Just think of all of the socialism that could pay for.
I guess I am on board if we are using it for socialism.
 
I’m telling you if the distributors unilaterally were cut by 10%, they wouldn’t be in business.
No they would take their hair cut and pass the rest on to the manufacturers.

Literally everything you mention already has a competitive bidding process. You act like there are a bunch of rubes that are just ripe for swindling. Literally every commodity utilized in the medical industry is under constant and intense downward pressure. The free market is working on the supply side.
if you are telling me this is all labor then I guess I have to believe you. (You should look at the financials of the companies doing the bidding though)
fredgraph.png


You just don’t understand that world. I’m not going to try and continue to educate you.
Not sure I would trust any education I receive from some one who knows so little about boat anchors
 
Last edited:
I guess I am on board if we are using it for socialism.
It would be used to pay for Berniecare, which will be socialized medicine. Whatever isn't used for Berniecare can be directed into Social Security or poop patrols as the US begins to look like San Francisco under leftist leadership.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
It would be used to pay for Berniecare, which will be socialized medicine. Whatever isn't used for Berniecare can be directed into Social Security or poop patrols as the US begins to look like San Francisco under leftist leadership.
I am going to need more socialism than that before I agree to a 90% capital gains tax.
 
I am going to need more socialism than that before I agree to a 90% capital gains tax.
So you're committed to free shit as long as you aren't paying for it?

Why should doctors and nurses have a higher effective tax rate for providing your "free" medical care than someone who makes money because they are privileged enough to have money to invest? That's sounding a lot more like Venezuelan socialism than Democratic socialism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
So you're committed to free shit as long as you aren't paying for it?

Why should doctors and nurses have a higher effective tax rate for providing your "free" medical care than someone who makes money because they are privileged enough to have money to invest? That's sounding a lot more like Venezuelan socialism than Democratic socialism.
I agree with you in principal, but 90% is just too high with out more socialism.

(I pay more in income tax and payroll tax than I do capital gains even if it were 90%)
 
I agree with you in principal, but 90% is just too high with out more socialism.

(I pay more in income tax and payroll tax than I do capital gains even if it were 90%)
Ok. I'll compromise. Whatever isn't used for Bernicare gets to go to whatever social programs you'd like. How much revenue do you think the feds would get from taxing capital gains at 90%?
 
They can certainly keep the investment as long as they like. When they sell it, us socialists will get 90% of their action. The more valuable at the time of sale, the better. I'm very patient.
We kind of need the revenue now to make up for the inevitable reduction in investment.

I typed that and then I remembered I am an MMTer so we don't need the revenue just the freeing up of real resources. I'm in.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT