What was his sin?
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...ump-rally-should-never-work-in-nba-again.html
The left is insane.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...ump-rally-should-never-work-in-nba-again.html
The left is insane.
So attending a Trump rally is the same thing as disrespecting the flag?“Kevin McHale just became the other side of Colin Kaepernick. Hard to see him ever coaching again in the NBA,” one writer added while another said.”
Glass Houses.....throwing stones....all that.
So attending a Trump rally is the same thing as disrespecting the flag?
While on or off the clock at work?Exercising free speech on a topic of public concern?
ABSOLUTELY the same thing.
While on or off the clock at work?
Don't think McHale is on the court in uniform taking a knee when the national anthem is being played.
What was his sin?
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...ump-rally-should-never-work-in-nba-again.html
The left is insane.
I think a lot of the current craziness got amped up (like a actual knob dial turning) in 2015 — when public personalities started getting into deep sh*t for disagreeing that Caitlyn Jenner is a hero. (And deserved that ESPN award)
It was a sudden (and major) shift in the Overton window, in that specific time period, and over that specific story. (Jenner)
The institutional left trialed new tactics for generating conformity on a previously little-discussed issue, used new ways of public shaming (on social media), maintaining thought control, acceptable speech, etc.
When we look back 10 years from now — I truly think we’ll be able to refer to the Caitlyn Jenner story as a specific moment (in 2015) where things in society definitely changed.
When I voted for Obama in 2008, I wouldn’t have thought transgenderism would the the chosen issue eventually used to morph and divide society.
When I voted for Obama in 2008, I wouldn’t have thought transgenderism would the the chosen issue eventually used to morph and divide society.
The issue may be similar but the circumstances are different. One was at the venue where he received his paycheck and the other was not.So what?
They’re both exercising speech that their private employer may or may not agree with and may or may not take action against them for.
The issue may be similar but the circumstances are different. One was at the venue where he received his paycheck and the other was not.
“Kevin McHale just became the other side of Colin Kaepernick. Hard to see him ever coaching again in the NBA,” one writer added while another said.”
Glass Houses.....throwing stones....all that.
This is nonsense.
I don’t think Kaepernick or McHale have been disciplined by their employers.
First (in 2015) it was having to publicly state Jenner is a hero — or face consequences and shaming.
Then it moved into bathroom wars (Target), gender neutral bathrooms, letting trans men into women’s bathrooms etc.
(It included the gender neutral pronouns etc — something nobody had ever heard of a decade ago)
Around 2016 or so, they introduced children into the trans stuff with trans children appearing on grocery store magazine covers (Nat Geographic etc), articles etc.
By 2017, the NYT was pushing opinion pieces like this:
This is a lot of stuff in only a few years — I contend you can specifically originate it to the Caitlyn Jenner story in 2015 — it was a defining cultural moment.
![]()
![]()
Apples and oranges.
Tell me about the heat LeBron caught for publicly attending a Hillary Clinton rally.
Not apples and oranges at all. Also, that quote comes from the article you posted.
If a private employer doesn’t like the political acts or conduct or positions their employee takes...it they think keeping them on after they take such acts or make such speech will cost them money in the end...letting them go is perfectly rational, legal, and IMO ethical.
Wouldn’t they have to show they fired people in the past for a similar act?
Nope.
I was on the cutting edge — outside the US (living in one of the most progressive cities in the Western Hemisphere) and living deep in the heart of America’s capital of weird.
I went to my first South by Southwest in 2012 — it was truly amazing.
One of the best entertainment experiences of my life (five straight days of insane fun) - back then you could go from venue to venue, no cover or lines, incredible ranges of music , artists and technology — and minimal hassles and drama. Unbelievable excitement. It’s gotten cruddy since.
I went to a lot of Vice Magazine parties at SX in 2012, and they were awesome.
If you had asked me about the upcoming transgender push in 2012, if that was going to be the next defining thing — I would have never thought so. And I was always around liberals and progressives. Nobody ever talked about that.
So yes, 2015, Caitlyn Jenner, is a defining cultural watershed moment. Overton window level stuff.
Also how are these activities covered in their handbooks?
It really is amazing that a group (far-left) wears such blinders that they don’t understand their intolerant actions are viewed negatively by with many Americans.This is great news for the republicans in the midterms.
And even more nonsense.
Exercising free speech on a topic of public concern?
ABSOLUTELY the same thing.
I wonder what would happen if Bruce wore a #maga hat????Like I said:
Caitlyn Jenner winning that ESPN award over these guys in 2015 (and other stuff surrounding it) = cultural watershed moment.
It might have even changed America forever.
![]()
![]()
![]()
So Kevin McHale was making political statements while on the job?
Or did he do it on his own time?
Again, so what?
The different circumstance you contend exist are meaningless and irrelevant to the law and ethical questions raised.
Like I said:
Caitlyn Jenner winning that ESPN award over these guys in 2015 (and other stuff surrounding it) = cultural watershed moment.
It might have even changed America forever.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Maybe read the thread before asking me a question I’ve already answered.
You allowed to use your platform as a state employee to make political statements because “free speech?”
It absolutely matters.
He can be fired for attending a political event on his own time but it’s absolutely a right of NFL players to use their work platform to make political statements while on the job?
Hypocrisy much?
1. Neither CK nor KM are employed by the state...an important difference when it comes to 1st Amendment issues. And no, I never said that I am allowed to use my platform as a state employee to make political statements because free speech. Of course, I never said CK is allowed to do so without fear of repercussions either.
2. You’ve strawmanned a position I have NEVER taken. My consistent position in this thread and elsewhere is that the NFL can fire or not hire CK or any other employee for kneeling if they want and KM employer’s can do the same for attending a political event on his own time if they choose to do so.
So....ZERO....hypocrisy here.
ZERO.
Ok, then we agree
Apologies
I wonder what would happen if Bruce wore a #maga hat????