Enterprise Product Partners is probably the best run pipeline company there is and certainly one of the largest. Conservatively run and solid as a rock. Brilliant management team. Here is their investor deck. Go to page 8 where they begin to talk about future oil and gas demand. The future demand for fossil fuels is off the charts and not going anywhere in our lifetime. Like it or not, that's the reality of our situation.Can you share one of those sources?
I see you laughed at my post. Looks like you actually got the intended message. Maybe you aren’t as stupid as everyone says.
It must be very stressful, being such an intelligent man of good intentions, yet having to force yourself into buying all this leftist drivel.
iasooner2000 didn't invite me along to declare anyone stupid. He invited me here to read the handful declare themselves stupid. The majority knows the stars of the show.Good point. Perhaps you’ll pass that along to your climate alarmist buddies who’ve provided us with a never ending stream of anecdotal weather observations for years.
Appreciate the reference. Not a lot to argue with in that deck. I don't disagree with your assertion that we are a decade or so away from reaching the tipping point. The economic advantage of solar are readily apparent with accelerated adoption constrained by access to raw materials and manufacturing capacity in the medium term.Enterprise Product Partners is probably the best run pipeline company there is and certainly one of the largest. Conservatively run and solid as a rock. Brilliant management team. Here is their investor deck. Go to page 8 where they begin to talk about future oil and gas demand. The future demand for fossil fuels is off the charts and not going anywhere in our lifetime. Like it or not, that's the reality of our situation.
Kindly educate this poor old soul. Please divulge the readily apparent economic advantage of solar ….Appreciate the reference. Not a lot to argue with in that deck. I don't disagree with your assertion that we are a decade or so away from reaching the tipping point. The economic advantage of solar are readily apparent with accelerated adoption constrained by access to raw materials and manufacturing capacity in the medium term.
iasooner2000 didn't invite me along to declare anyone stupid. He invited me here to read the handful declare themselves stupid. The majority knows the stars of the show.
What is medium term? How many years or decades? You do know how many coal plants China is building per year? And what is the medium term for them to stop? And did how we leave Afghanistan compromise access to raw materials?Appreciate the reference. Not a lot to argue with in that deck. I don't disagree with your assertion that we are a decade or so away from reaching the tipping point. The economic advantage of solar are readily apparent with accelerated adoption constrained by access to raw materials and manufacturing capacity in the medium term.
IMO, solar will always be rather insignificant and a minor player. Just too inefficient and unreliable. Nuclear is the answer and can make a dent. France, of all people, are leading the world on nuclear. But most people have a provincial view of it and act like the technology today is still like Six Mile Island or Chernobyl. Not even close. And, of course, there's always the "what do we do with the waste?" aspect. I just watched this little 5 minute video on that today that was very informative. And by no means am I an expert on nuclear power.Appreciate the reference. Not a lot to argue with in that deck. I don't disagree with your assertion that we are a decade or so away from reaching the tipping point. The economic advantage of solar are readily apparent with accelerated adoption constrained by access to raw materials and manufacturing capacity in the medium term.
See what is happening in Europe and americasThe liberal dumbshytes reported on the news tonight that 6,500 year old temperature records are being broken around the world. Good Lord, how stupid are these people, and the gullible slow who believe it?
Stop the cows from eating grass and folks from eating beans?See what is happening in Europe and americas
Like I’ve said before, if we stop breathing and stop farting, we can save the Earth. Mankind would die, but to save the globe, isn’t it worth it? 🙄🙄🙄Stop the cows from eating grass and folks from eating beans?
Sounds like one of greta's ideas. 😁Like I’ve said before, if we stop breathing and stop farting, we can save the Earth. Mankind would die, but to save the globe, isn’t it worth it? 🙄🙄🙄
What i want to know is who was taking temperature readings before 1900 that gives us an accurate basis for a historical record of what a “record“ high or low would be? I mean i know that the temperature was taken some places, but not as widespread and probably not as accurately as today.
See what is happening in Europe and americas
Are you suggesting we have a slow 14?You lack the intelligence needed to post on this message board.
Sorry bruh, PragerU causes brain cancer.IMO, solar will always be rather insignificant and a minor player. Just too inefficient and unreliable. Nuclear is the answer and can make a dent. France, of all people, are leading the world on nuclear. But most people have a provincial view of it and act like the technology today is still like Six Mile Island or Chernobyl. Not even close. And, of course, there's always the "what do we do with the waste?" aspect. I just watched this little 5 minute video on that today that was very informative. And by no means am I an expert on nuclear power.
How Dangerous Is Nuclear Waste? | PragerU
Even environmentalists concede that nuclear power is a clean source of abundant, reliable energy. But they stop short of supporting it. Why? Because of the…www.prageru.com
No, PragerU enlightens but your response does nothing to refute the points he makes. It just says "I don't want to hear it." And that's exactly how Biden got elected. Sheer willful ignorance. And now look at this mess we're in.Sorry bruh, PragerU causes brain cancer.
Solar is inefficient? How so?
No, PragerU enlightens but your response does nothing to refute the points he makes. It just says "I don't want to hear it." And that's exactly how Biden got elected. Sheer willful ignorance. And now look at this mess we're in.
How is solar inefficient? Can you answer using your own words?No, PragerU enlightens but your response does nothing to refute the points he makes. It just says "I don't want to hear it." And that's exactly how Biden got elected. Sheer willful ignorance. And now look at this mess we're in.
Degradation for starters.How is solar inefficient? Can you answer using your own words?
Degradation for starters.
How does that compare to other systems in terms of cost per unit of energy produced?Degradation for starters.
It’s unreliable as hell. Ask the Europeans. No way in hell you can rely upon solar energy for your power grid. It cost a fortune and unless you live in San Diego like I do, who knows if you ever gonna have enough sun. And then like that one big solar field in Nebraska I believe that just got totally wiped out by a hail storm. How many gazillions of dollars did they spend for that mess? It’s an inefficient and expensive Band-Aid for a real solution. And besides, those goddamn things are ugly as hell. You put them on a house and it looks like your house has herpes.How is solar inefficient? Can you answer using your own words?
Have you looked into the effects that groundwater pumping has on the climate?How does that compare to other systems in terms of cost per unit of energy produced?
I am going to do a guesstimate and say less than 1 gazillionIt’s unreliable as hell. Ask the Europeans. No way in hell you can rely upon solar energy for your power grid. It cost a fortune and unless you live in San Diego like I do, who knows if you ever gonna have enough sun. And then like that one big solar field in Nebraska I believe that just got totally wiped out by a hail storm. How many gazillions of dollars did they spend for that mess? It’s an inefficient and expensive Band-Aid for a real solution. And besides, those goddamn things are ugly as hell. You put them on a house and it looks like your house has herpes.
At 0.5% annual. Which equates to roughly 12-15% energy production loss…..over a 25-30 year lifespan.
carry on
How does that compare to other systems in terms of cost per unit of energy produced?
I don't think you've done any real homework. That's too bad.It’s unreliable as hell. Ask the Europeans. No way in hell you can rely upon solar energy for your power grid. It cost a fortune and unless you live in San Diego like I do, who knows if you ever gonna have enough sun. And then like that one big solar field in Nebraska I believe that just got totally wiped out by a hail storm. How many gazillions of dollars did they spend for that mess? It’s an inefficient and expensive Band-Aid for a real solution. And besides, those goddamn things are ugly as hell. You put them on a house and it looks like your house has herpes.
Tell me moore.Have you looked into the effects that groundwater pumping has on the climate?
How many nuclear reactors or natural gas peaker plants do you own?Do either one of you have Solar Panels?
How many nuclear reactors or natural gas peaker plants do you own?
Rooftop solar doesn't pencil out for my house - too many tall trees shading the roof.
You apparently missed the sermon on utility-scale renewables. Understandable.So not practicing what you preach. Got it! 🤣
And I think you believe this "climate myth" because all your sources are junk science and cherry picked data. Here's a great article that just came out today. But, of course, since it was printed from Fox News you'll dismiss it out of hand and continue to put your head in the sand and believe the same leftie drivel that always leads you to an intellectually dead end and mass delusion. You know, like the belief that Biden is innocent and the Justice Dept isn't corrupt.I don't think you've done any real homework. That's too bad.
The Warmist religion is 0-52 in dire predictions. I read this last year in the Washington Post wanabe (Waco Tribune-Heald).
So, let's say to fit your agenda (media and left wingers), you want to write an article showing what a massive heat wave we are having and man made activity is causing an "end of the world" scenario and panic. (Picture the religious zealot of a street corner with a sign saying "The end is near". That's you guys promoting your new religion...environmentalism). Do you start your comparison in the 1930's? No, of course not! You cherry pick the data and you begin your propaganda in the 60's and 70's when it was unusually cool. THAT'S how you promote pure crap and push your insane agenda that is literally at the root cause of inflation and a diminishing of the quality of life for billions of people around the world. It's sheer insanity!