ADVERTISEMENT

Inspector General (IG) report — official thread

Who gives a fvck who was actually helped? The result isn’t the issue, the intent is. These people did their best to help Hillary but they thankfully fvcked up bad enough it backfired and hurt her. It doesn’t mean what they did was ok just because it didn’t work.

This is spot on 2001! The INTENT was to bury Trump and help Jimmy Hoffa in drag. It went the opposite way, although I keep asking myself two questions;
1. If myself or anyone on this board (save JD since he knows the system :)) had done what The Hildabeast had done where would we be now. Besides having declared bankruptcy from attorney costs?
2. How can anyone sacrifice their professionalism and integrity for a single person, over a nation? Of course on the backside they were looking for cushy treatment and or appointments, which even makes this worse

Again, anyone who committed a crime needs to see the inside of a cell, no exceptions.
 
Last edited:
So the two love birds weren’t trying to bury Trump?
Strzok: I'LL STOP TRUMP!!!!!

Trump:
you-almost-had-it.jpg



The texts and messages are the best part of the report by a mile.
 
Why are you avoiding the question of why this report just took a big dump on your family heirloom china? NOW? WILL SHE BE CHARGED NOW?
It didn't. It's exactly what I thought it would be. The 0bama DOJ leadership was a bunch of window licking retards which is on par with the other losers he appointed. The report illustrates this in paint by number so that even a Trumpanzee like you can figure it out. You can't put the cat back into the bag.

BTW, have they got Trump for collusion yet?
 
It didn't. It's exactly what I thought it would be. The 0bama DOJ leadership was a bunch of window licking retards which is on par with the other losers he appointed. The report illustrates this in paint by number so that even a Trumpanzee like you can figure it out. You can't put the cat back into the bag.

BTW, have they got Trump for collusion yet?

So why aren't they charging her?
 
Another thing, if the dip shit ex-rodent in chief and his merry gang of inspector Clouseau clones knew the Russians (among others) were attempting to interfere with the election process why didn’t they say something BEFORE the election? Who did that limp wristed SOB think it was going to help?
In fact here is what the dip stick said the Italian PM October 2016;

“‘There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections, in part because they’re so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved,’ Obama said. ‘There’s no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time,’ he continued. ‘And so, I’d advise Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes.’

Here is what he said AFTER the election.
At the end of December 2016, in the last weeks of his presidency and with Mr. Trump’s victory, Mr. Obama suddenly decided the Russians were of interest, issued sanctions and expelled 35 Russians for “efforts to interfere with the U.S. presidential election,” according to the Guardian. In retrospect, actions that conveniently shoehorned with what we now know as the Democrats’ now debunked “Trump colluded with the Russians” narrative.

Conversely, here are things, some against the law, that the extra-rodent in chief got away with that should blunt any of his or the liberals disgust with the whole Russian hoax, even if parts of it were true.

Also let’s not forget the US meddling in the Israeli elections by using tax payer monies through the state department to fund an opposition group to Bibi. The group funded was Victory15 or V15.

There’s the open mic catching the ex-rodent in chief telling Medvedev (from Reuters) “As he was leaning toward Medvedev in Seoul, Obama was overheard asking for time — ‘particularly with missile defense’ — until he is in a better position politically to resolve such issues. ‘I understand your message about space,’ replied Medvedev, who will hand over the presidency to Putin in May. ‘This is my last election. … After my election I have more flexibility,’ Obama said …”

Problem #1 is both parties, with a few exceptions, are the opposite sides of the same coin. The other problem is the media, who is suppose to lay out the truth no matter who it exposes has completely abrogated their job and become virtually cheerleaders for one idiology and executioners for the other. They will not hold everyone accountable to the same standards.....
 
Another thing, if the dip shit ex-rodent in chief and his merry gang of inspector Clouseau clones knew the Russians (among others) were attempting to interfere with the election process why didn’t they say something BEFORE the election? Who did that limp wristed SOB think it was going to help?
In fact here is what the dip stick said the Italian PM October 2016;

“‘There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections, in part because they’re so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved,’ Obama said. ‘There’s no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time,’ he continued. ‘And so, I’d advise Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes.’

Here is what he said AFTER the election.
At the end of December 2016, in the last weeks of his presidency and with Mr. Trump’s victory, Mr. Obama suddenly decided the Russians were of interest, issued sanctions and expelled 35 Russians for “efforts to interfere with the U.S. presidential election,” according to the Guardian. In retrospect, actions that conveniently shoehorned with what we now know as the Democrats’ now debunked “Trump colluded with the Russians” narrative.

Conversely, here are things, some against the law, that the extra-rodent in chief got away with that should blunt any of his or the liberals disgust with the whole Russian hoax, even if parts of it were true.

Also let’s not forget the US meddling in the Israeli elections by using tax payer monies through the state department to fund an opposition group to Bibi. The group funded was Victory15 or V15.

There’s the open mic catching the ex-rodent in chief telling Medvedev (from Reuters) “As he was leaning toward Medvedev in Seoul, Obama was overheard asking for time — ‘particularly with missile defense’ — until he is in a better position politically to resolve such issues. ‘I understand your message about space,’ replied Medvedev, who will hand over the presidency to Putin in May. ‘This is my last election. … After my election I have more flexibility,’ Obama said …”

Problem #1 is both parties, with a few exceptions, are the opposite sides of the same coin. The other problem is the media, who is suppose to lay out the truth no matter who it exposes has completely abrogated their job and become virtually cheerleaders for one idiology and executioners for the other. They will not hold everyone accountable to the same standards.....

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/21/5876...a-stop-russia-s-election-interference-in-2016
 
Holy shit — buried in the IG report fine print.

Strzok committed a felony.





Peter Strzok — one of Robert Mueller’s right-hand men in 2017:



8_EBB787_E_016_E_462_F_8_CC7_3_F35_FD2157_B6.jpg




More details:


F245_F4_E5_C919_4_D4_A_8_A27_063_FC48_A9_C63.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
JD: out of humility and respect, and a lot of years on this board, I'm happy to debate on here with different style (and again, I never got into vicious personal attacks with anyone -- not my deal).

And the very next post...a twitter cut and past extravaganza essentially identical to all the ones in this thread made prior to the above statement.

Holy shit — buried in the IG report fine print.

Strzok committed a felony.





Peter Strzok — one of Robert Mueller’s right-hand men in 2017:



8_EBB787_E_016_E_462_F_8_CC7_3_F35_FD2157_B6.jpg




More details:


F245_F4_E5_C919_4_D4_A_8_A27_063_FC48_A9_C63.jpg

Le sigh...
 
I started this thread, and this is breaking information about a 560 page report.


In other threads and places, I’ll discuss and debate things in other ways.


Peter Strzok (Robert Mueller’s right-hand man in 2017) committed a felony.
 
I started this thread, and this is breaking information about a 560 page report.


In other threads and places, I’ll discuss and debate things in other ways.


Peter Strzok (Robert Mueller’s right-hand man in 2017) committed a felony.

No you won’t.

You’ll just justify doing the same old crap because you started the thread and you believe it’s breaking information.

Did you decide whether or not the legal assertion that he had committed a felony was true and correct?

Did you not the fact that the headline says he sent the sealed indictment to his personal-mail, but the actual language contradicts that?


During our review, we identified several instances where Strzok used his personal email account for government business. […] Most troubling, on October 29, 2016, Strzok forwarded from his FBI account to his personal email account an email about the proposed search warrant the Midyear team was seeking on the Weiner laptop.

This email included a draft of the search warrant affidavit, which contained information from the Weiner investigation that appears to have been under seal at the time in the Southern District of New York and information obtained pursuant to a grand jury subpoena issued in the Eastern District of Virginia in the Midyear investigation.

Did you consider the possibility that the information referred to came from somewhere other than the indictment?

Did you consider why the report says “appears” rather than “was”?

I bet you didn’t. You ain’t got time for that. Critical analysis before cutting, pasting, and parroting is for plebeians.

Le sigh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: my_2cents
One of the most powerful (in real effectiveness) government officials in American history?

He was involved in so much — Anthony Weiner emails, Huma Abedin emails, Hillary emails, working closely with Mueller on “Russia.” Who even knows what else.

He gives off a really strange vibe too. Actually look into eyes in both photos.



488D358C00000578-5337305-image-m-7_1517442850769.jpg



477A942D00000578-0-image-a-2_1513785206872.jpg
 
So no...you didn’t ask yourself any of those questions.

Instead you’re going with “strange vibe”.

Crack critical analysis there.
 
He gives off a really strange vibe too. Actually look into eyes in both photos — something about him is rather disturbing.

Really? This is all you are left with after CowboyJD's post? You know, I have heard this exact comment about Trump from those who politically oppose Trump.
 
JD is the lawyer — he knows his legal stuff.

I’m not going to try out-argue the board lawyer, on law.

But there is all kinds information on the IG report coming out. It’s the weekend, and people are finally able to dive into the fine print.

I think you seriously might have jumped the gun on all of this @my_2cents .
 
  • Like
Reactions: HanAholeSolo2.0
JD is the lawyer — he knows his legal stuff.

I’m not going to try out-argue the board lawyer, on law.

But there is all kinds information on the IG report coming out. It’s the weekend, and people are finally able to dive into the fine print.

I think you seriously might have jumped the gun on all of this @my_2cents .

And again...when your cut and pastes are challenged...

You punt.

Le sigh.
 
JD is the lawyer — he knows his legal stuff.

I’m not going to try out-argue the board lawyer, on law.

But there is all kinds information on the IG report coming out. It’s the weekend, and people are finally able to dive into the fine print.

I think you seriously might have jumped the gun on all of this @my_2cents .

Have you considered the possibility that you have jumped the gun on all of this as well?

How many “Holy Shit”s and “This is big!” have you had in this thread already?
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xl72qcu5isp39
JD is the lawyer — he knows his legal stuff.

I’m not going to try out-argue the board lawyer, on law.

It isn't about trying to beat him in an argument. You don't even have to be a lawyer NZ to see what CowboyJD showed you. All you had to do was give that stuff an "unbias" reading. Instead of automatically assuming it is right because of the source, or the headline, or whatever --- read it. Analyze it.

I think you seriously might have jumped the gun on all of this.

I haven't jumped the gun on anything. The report is rather clear in its conclusions. Some questions are still left open but that is the nature of the material it investigated.

Yes, the fringe right wants to make it into more than it is for political reasons. I get that. But most can see through that junk.
 
Really? This is all you are left with after CowboyJD's post? You know, I have heard this exact comment about Trump from those who politically oppose Trump.

What kind of vibe (or energy) do you you think Peter Strzok gives off?


It's not a hard question to answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
What kind of vibe (or energy) do you you think Peter Strzok gives off?


It's not a hard question to answer.

I don't know, nor do I care, what type of vibe he gives off. How in the world is that relevant to anything?

btw, have you ever met him?
 
Actually, just posting on a discussion board which is about the same I guess.

Every once in awhile. For whatever goddamn reason. You get a stick up your ass and pick a random fight with me.

Why?

Lol.

From my perspective every once in awhile for whatever goddamn reason you get incredibly sensitive and touchy, start taking yourself way too seriously, and looking for insults when none are there.

Potato/potatah, I guess.

Your “spoiler” was an address. Maybe not to anyone in particular in favor of being to everyone maybe...but it was an address. So you addressed “someone”. You said “spoiler: it’s not nothing burger”...I merely pointed out nobody has said it was...and suddenly I’m picking a fight. Yet, I’ve seen you do exactly the same thing when Sys has been ranting about Mary Fallin.

So yeah...probably potato/potatah.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT