ADVERTISEMENT

Insider book claim: Russia nonsense was Hillary's idea immediately after loss

MegaPoke

Moderator
Moderator
May 29, 2001
58,300
56,130
113
54
Tulsa
www.shipmanphotos.com
excerpt from linked story:

The book further highlights how Clinton’s Russia-blame-game was a plan hatched by senior campaign staffers John Podesta and Robby Mook, less than “within twenty-four hours” after she conceded:

That strategy had been set within twenty-four hours of her concession speech. Mook and Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.

The Clinton camp settled on a two-pronged plan — pushing the press to cover how “Russian hacking was the major unreported story of the campaign, overshadowed by the contents of stolen e-mails and Hillary’s own private-server imbroglio,” while “hammering the media for focusing so intently on the investigation into her e-mail, which had created a cloud over her candidacy,” the authors wrote.

“The press botched the e-mail story for eighteen months,” one person who was part of the strategy is quoted as saying. “Comey obviously screwed us, but the press created the story.”


http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...cking-narrative-24-hours-after-hillarys-loss/
 
As many have said before, the United States and the world at large will be much better off when the Clintons are finally gone for good. They drag us all through the mud when they win and they drag us through the mud when they lose. It is never cut and dry with them.
 
excerpt from linked story:

The book further highlights how Clinton’s Russia-blame-game was a plan hatched by senior campaign staffers John Podesta and Robby Mook, less than “within twenty-four hours” after she conceded:

That strategy had been set within twenty-four hours of her concession speech. Mook and Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.

The Clinton camp settled on a two-pronged plan — pushing the press to cover how “Russian hacking was the major unreported story of the campaign, overshadowed by the contents of stolen e-mails and Hillary’s own private-server imbroglio,” while “hammering the media for focusing so intently on the investigation into her e-mail, which had created a cloud over her candidacy,” the authors wrote.

“The press botched the e-mail story for eighteen months,” one person who was part of the strategy is quoted as saying. “Comey obviously screwed us, but the press created the story.”


http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...cking-narrative-24-hours-after-hillarys-loss/


Sent myself a note yesterday to see what reviews this book was receiving and consider purchasing it.
Here was the review I saw:

http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...-parnes-clinton-campaign-dysfunction-revealed
 
As many have said before, the United States and the world at large will be much better off when the Clintons are finally gone for good. They drag us all through the mud when they win and they drag us through the mud when they lose. It is never cut and dry with them.


it's mind numbing the stupid bitch is still news

find an ice flow a nice pot of whale phat and float away already
 
sdn5sonelxsy.jpg



6XDmD9.png


ehf.jpg
 
Last edited:
She'll go away when her fat-ass is planted; sadly, dog biscuit girl will pick up the spoon and continue the gagglization of America, pimped by the MSM whores.
 
So Clinton advisors decided to make an issue of Russian interference in the election and possible collusion with the Trump campaign after the election because they felt like it had been under-reported and had an affect on the election.

And this is surprising because?
 
I'd also like to get a few of the lemmings in here to catch their take on (mostly) being led around by the nose on Russia.

Funny you post this, as you consistently post links from breitbart. lol, who is being led around by the nose?

Look, I know that the Russian issue is troublesome for Trump supporters, although they don't want to admit it. Claiming that Clinton advisors wanted to push the story after the election is not surprising at all. Nor does it in any way lessen what has been learned and the connections we continue to discover between Russia and the Trump campaign.

It is hilarious to watch individuals who obsessed over the Clinton email scandal (something pushed by the right btw) for years now trying to make every excuse in the book for why the Russian scandal doesn't matter. You guys didn't want a President under investigation by the FBI...and yet, you now have it. With Trump.

What goes around comes around...
 
So Clinton advisors decided to make an issue of Russian interference in the election and possible collusion with the Trump campaign after the election because they felt like it had been under-reported and had an affect on the election.

And this is surprising because?
It is not surprising at all that the Clintons always look for excuses when they come up short. She lost because she was a horrible candidate.
 
It is not surprising at all that the Clintons always look for excuses when they come up short.

It isn't an excuse. It has now been proven that Russia interfered in the election to defeat Clinton. Whether or not that cost her the election is debatable (there are numerous reasons that contributed to Clinton's lose).

It sure didn't help though.
 
I wouldn't consider hacking the DNC interfering with the election. They attempted to hack the RNC also.

I feel bad if people are that weak minded that any of stuff that came out of wikileaks influenced their vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imprimis
I wouldn't consider hacking the DNC interfering with the election.

Of course it was interference, especially in how they used the hacked material.

There is no doubt that Russia interfered in the election and that Russia preferred Trump over Clinton. I really don't understand why some still want to deny this when it has been proven. Saying this though doesn't mean that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to defeat Clinton. Nor does it mean that Trump is controlled by the Russians or somehow compromised by them.

Yet, this stuff is serious and that is why it continues to be investigated. Let's just hope it isn't shown that the Trump campaign was working with the Russian government. That would be disgraceful.
 
Of course it was interference, especially in how they used the hacked material.

There is no doubt that Russia interfered in the election and that Russia preferred Trump over Clinton. I really don't understand why some still want to deny this when it has been proven. Saying this though doesn't mean that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to defeat Clinton. Nor does it mean that Trump is controlled by the Russians or somehow compromised by them.

Yet, this stuff is serious and that is why it continues to be investigated. Let's just hope it isn't shown that the Trump campaign was working with the Russian government. That would be disgraceful.

If exposing that HRC was colluding with the DNC to defeat Bernie and then colluding with CNN to rig a debate is interfering, then I want more interfering.
 
It isn't an excuse. It has now been proven that Russia interfered in the election to defeat Clinton. Whether or not that cost her the election is debatable (there are numerous reasons that contributed to Clinton's lose).

It sure didn't help though.

What exactly did Russia do and how? We have no details, none. Spell it out in detail, I am all ears.
 
What exactly did Russia do and how? We have no details, none. Spell it out in detail, I am all ears.

They tweeted a bunch of shit that, apparently, hypnotized people into voting for Trump.

Crazy, next level shit, yo.

We don't stand a chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Russia made millions of people who voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012 stay home or go vote for the Donald.

It couldn't have been that Hillary is a horrible candidate.....IT HAD TO BE RUSSIA!

Hillary 2016: 65,853,516
Trump 2016: 62,984,825

Obama 2012: 65,915,795
Romney 2012: 60,933,504

Obama 2008: 69,498,516
McCain 2008: 59,948,323

Flippy 2004: 59,028,444
Bush 2004: 62,040,610

Gore 2000: 50,999,897
Bush 2000: 50,456,002
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT