GOP Convention | Ivanka wins
- Thread starter tlwwake
- Start date
If some stolen potential-FL lines changes a person's position on who to vote for, they didn't and never will know who to vote for
In climate change research, self reporting on emails, overseeing tax teams, etc, yeah, fabrication or stealing is bad. Candidates wife speech...snooze.
This is just funny considering that it is liberals that are more authoritarian, impulsive (violent reaction), likely to suppress speech (intolerant), and all around more prone to psychotic behavior.
Example after example out there proving their intolerance and violence. Hell, huff po even wrote a peice justifying violent reactions toward Trump supporters as "logical."
the two guys in the middle are yours, syssie. Look up armed libs at rnc.
Or just continue to blindly Google.
*BELCH*
Or just continue to blindly Google.
*BELCH*
My five year old was watching Rudy's speech and said "I'm not voting for trump anymore, I want this guy."
A picture of people parading outside the end with assault rifles is posted and you comment that liberals are violent. So you think the behavior of those people is normal?
McVeigh. These wackos. Alex Jones. on every level the right just keeps up the violence and insanity. The best part is when they swear off violence but insist people like McVeigh, James Holmes, the Dallas guy etc get assault rifles with no scrutiny.
Yeah, liberals are authoritarian and prone to psychotic behavior. They aren't harming anyone by carrying. You want to suppress that. What's more authoritarian?
Right. I don't wanna live in a place where people have to walk around with guns, like Somalia or Afghanistan. You apparently think that's a good thing.
Thank you for finally admitting your authoritarian nature. Have you ever considered how utterly irresponsible it is to compare politicians to Hitler, Mao, Stalin etc., you know, people guilty of major atrocities? I have and it's a reason I no longer make "Maobama" jokes.
Hey @MegaPoke you better get to Cleveland -- your brethren are assembling! Take some khaki cargo pants. The extra pockets are good for extra clips and grenades.
And yet there have been no mass shootings by anyone so far...which is interesting.
Yes, that's why I generally don't do it. It also marginalizes whoever is saying it. Listen to Alex Jones for a while if you want to hear it. I can't believe someone from the right is criticizing that tactic.
I
Ooh, you almost got a like. Then you had to go and try to throw a non sequitur insult.
Did I use that right? Oh well, who cares. Point remains.
It's not an insult. I'm glad you don't do that for the same reasons I don't. But the voices from your end of the politcal spectrum do it as a s.o.p. I agree with you but disagree with your fellow conservatives.
Ok. So where do you draw the line?
In this post you equate Donald Trump to Chancellor Sutler (a fascist) from V for Vendetta who helped to organize the mass killing of civilians to ensure absolute power for the state and namely himself.
Is it only destructive when comparing to real people and real atrocities or should it also be considered irresponsible to use characters who insinuate real people and real atrocities through fictitious works? Would some nut not be morally justified in preventing someone like Chancellor Sutler rising to power?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-schmeltzer/trumps-proposed-first-mov_b_11084210.html
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/05/politics/louis-ck-donald-trump-adolf-hitler/index.html
https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/04/why-donald-trump-is-worse-than-hitler.html
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/11/tru...created_a_modern_fascist_movement_in_america/
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/w...nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=1
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/05/opinion/sunday/no-hes-not-hitler-and-yet.html
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/05/politics/louis-ck-donald-trump-adolf-hitler/index.html
https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/04/why-donald-trump-is-worse-than-hitler.html
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/11/tru...created_a_modern_fascist_movement_in_america/
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/w...nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=1
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/05/opinion/sunday/no-hes-not-hitler-and-yet.html
Well, point taken. I've assumed everyone knows the Chancellor is fictional (It's a sci-fi movie) and it would be like using Darth Vader or like Colbert did with the Hunger Games costume. Given how literally some people on here take those stuff you have a point. Jonny is threatening lawuits and actually believes people want to kill babies in another thread, so I should not draw a line between fiction and reality for that stuff.
But the enormous video head of Trump with everyone looking up at him doesn't remind you of that scene, also given the authoritarian streak he has? It's eerie.
Pretty good takedown of the left/media's righteous indignation towards Pat Smith here:
https://ricochet.com/a-tale-of-two-moms/
The left made Cindy Sheehan a minor media sensation/celebrity when she mourned her son's loss in Iraq by lashing out at George Bush. In fact, Maureen Dowd, of the New York Times, said, in reference to Cindy Sheehan:
“the moral authority of parents who bury children killed in Iraq is absolute.”
https://ricochet.com/a-tale-of-two-moms/
The left made Cindy Sheehan a minor media sensation/celebrity when she mourned her son's loss in Iraq by lashing out at George Bush. In fact, Maureen Dowd, of the New York Times, said, in reference to Cindy Sheehan:
“the moral authority of parents who bury children killed in Iraq is absolute.”
We just have so very much in common with those countries. You are so good at analogies.
It's only eerie to you because of who it is. If it were a socialist/globalist icon like Obama, you would get at least a semi.
