Glenn Greenwald Gives The Scoop On The Omar Controversy
- Thread starter Ponca Dan
- Start date
Quite the quandary the Democrat Party find themselves in. Do they support the anti-Semite or risk alienating their Jewish donors and voters?
Useless article...so many things wrong about his angle PD. First name one other group of people that have been hounded from their ancestral homes like the Jews? They have been almost completely pushed out of nearly every country in Africa, the ME and some parts of Europe that use to be called home. They have been persecuted unlike most any other religious group in the history of mankind. They finally land in an area that is really their last bastion for survival and oh and they are a democracy. Into this flies the array of organizations and religions (UN & Muslims as a few examples) that routinely make their existence problematic and often fatal.
The palestinians mostly have put their faith in leaders who were the true "charlatans." They teach their children to hate the jews, want to be martyrs by killing jews and reward families who's members kill jews. They also build monuments to those who have killed jews and name streets/building after people who have killed jews. Don't hear a peep out of these same liberals about that, yet they have no issues tearing down Confederate monuments because Southerns fought for something that was legal back when (among so many other things). We have interlopers who think the Jewish State is unfair and commits human rights abuses routinely and thinks the lobbyist that preserve their protection from The US are somehow pulling the political strings here. Its absurd and I notice that the writer dinged the NRA, AIPAC and the fossil fuels industry without bringing up other groups that are part and parcel responsible for pushing an anti-Israel lobby....Soros comes to mind right off the bat. Wonder how much CAIR has supported this chick?
The wider discussion should be money in politics period! Why do liberals feel the need to dump millions into a Texas senate race where none of them reside? Why do conservative PACS dump money into races that can flip a seat from blue to red? Well is politics and really all depends on who's ox is being gored. Until this issue is ironed out though political PACS will definitely hold sway for the congress whores that need money like a drug addict needs drugs. What this chick exposes though is not "politics as normal" it comes from a deeper animus and she will continue to show her ass, book it Danno.
This moron freshman liberal muslim rep has an agenda that has been professed previously. She represents a district that is very much like her I suspect. Not sure why anyone would be shocked she keeps saying basically the same thing. If the US doesn't help Israel no one else will and when a muslim leader comes along that can get the palestinians onboard for real peace am certain the Israelis will be onboard also. Her complaining about AIPAC and money in politics is simply a smokescreen.
Want to also point out the restraint Israel exhibited when SCUDS were raining down on them during the first Gulf War. Do you suppose they did that because the US asked them to? We, The US, has one true friend in the ME and while they aren't perfect they are light years ahead of the other countries there, including the shithole that spawned her.
The palestinians mostly have put their faith in leaders who were the true "charlatans." They teach their children to hate the jews, want to be martyrs by killing jews and reward families who's members kill jews. They also build monuments to those who have killed jews and name streets/building after people who have killed jews. Don't hear a peep out of these same liberals about that, yet they have no issues tearing down Confederate monuments because Southerns fought for something that was legal back when (among so many other things). We have interlopers who think the Jewish State is unfair and commits human rights abuses routinely and thinks the lobbyist that preserve their protection from The US are somehow pulling the political strings here. Its absurd and I notice that the writer dinged the NRA, AIPAC and the fossil fuels industry without bringing up other groups that are part and parcel responsible for pushing an anti-Israel lobby....Soros comes to mind right off the bat. Wonder how much CAIR has supported this chick?
The wider discussion should be money in politics period! Why do liberals feel the need to dump millions into a Texas senate race where none of them reside? Why do conservative PACS dump money into races that can flip a seat from blue to red? Well is politics and really all depends on who's ox is being gored. Until this issue is ironed out though political PACS will definitely hold sway for the congress whores that need money like a drug addict needs drugs. What this chick exposes though is not "politics as normal" it comes from a deeper animus and she will continue to show her ass, book it Danno.
This moron freshman liberal muslim rep has an agenda that has been professed previously. She represents a district that is very much like her I suspect. Not sure why anyone would be shocked she keeps saying basically the same thing. If the US doesn't help Israel no one else will and when a muslim leader comes along that can get the palestinians onboard for real peace am certain the Israelis will be onboard also. Her complaining about AIPAC and money in politics is simply a smokescreen.
Want to also point out the restraint Israel exhibited when SCUDS were raining down on them during the first Gulf War. Do you suppose they did that because the US asked them to? We, The US, has one true friend in the ME and while they aren't perfect they are light years ahead of the other countries there, including the shithole that spawned her.
My guess is they voted no based on the fact it was a complete waste of time, money and energy to do this. Obviously they weren’t trying to shoot down a bill that basically says don’t be mean. More of a principle thing, but who knows, maybe 23 representatives really like hate speech.
@Ponca Dan That was a ridiculously biased article. That would be like me posting a Ben Shapiro article to prove my argument.
OK, I’ll take the bait. What has he said in the article that was intentionally incorrect? (I’m assuming your meaning biased in the sense he is skewering the truth.).
Dan, Glenn is biased (and right) because he is an avowed enemy of the national security state.
Yes, I suppose he is. I took SSS!!!’s use of the word bias to mean intentionally factually incorrect, and therefore not worthy of reflection. Perhaps I misread SSS!!!’s meaning or intention when using the word “biased.”
First off, I want to state that I don’t really have a side when it comes to Israeli politics. I have researched the I-P conflict and can’t decide which side is right. I honestly don’t think either is, they have both performed evil acts. Second, and back to your question, it’s biased in the sense it only presents one side of the argument. Is anything factually incorrect? I don’t have the time to fact check it. Read the article and you’d think anyone who supports Israel or thinks Ms Omar is out of line, is 100% wrong. I disagree w that. Like I said, I could probably post a Ben Shapiro article the says the exact opposite of that article. It would also be factually correct, but it wouldn’t get us anywhere.
