Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What will they do if she tells them to pound sand?
Also hard when the people lobbing Twitter bombs about said lobbying have no ****ing clue what they are talking about, e.g. the Congresswoman from MN.
Well, it’s been a constant stream of such crap since she was elected. And actually some before.I don’t believe her but it will placate the twitter hyenas for now.
She isn’t sorry we all agree right?
Omar apologized last month for posting the tweet referenced by Nadler, which read: "Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel. #Gaza #Palestine#Israel." As of Monday afternoon, the messages that caused the most recent furor were still posted on Omar's Twitter page.
She’ll say something just as idiotic within a month’s time.She is disgusting. This hand slap would be more meaningful if it also removed her from foreign affairs committee.
Turns out, it only took hours:I am betting within a weeks time.
She’ll say something just as idiotic within a month’s time.
Yes, I dispute it.What did you say that isn't true or is even remotely racist. Does any dispute that Israel is buying congressman through campaign contributions. Whether the money is Russian, Saudi, or Israel it should be a felony with a mandatory minimum prison sentence to take one cent from a foreign government. You are supposed to be a U.S. States Representative not a whore selling your goods to foreigners Glad to finally have someone in congress with the guts to speak out.
Oh, some of her comments come straight out of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” playbook, so it’s none too surprising that you find them persuasive.I’m no fan of this lady. But were her “idiotic” statements on the foreign lobbying group factually incorrect?
The lobbying group she criticized went “all out” in 2013 (see below) to get American troops involved in the Syrian civil war — a war that American voters wanted no part of.
Six years later, American troops are still “all in” the Syrian civil war. I guess that means the lobbying was successful?
In contrast, in 2016, 62 million American voters successfully elected a president who’s signature campaign item was building a wall — but for some reason the American voters couldn’t get what they wanted. And a lot more Americans wanted the wall (and voted for it) than the Syrian civil war.
Article: https://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/aipac-syria-096344
They aren’t in the top 100 of federal campaign donors?Let’s discuss AIPAC then. What’s unique about them?
Oh, some of her comments come straight out of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” playbook, so it’s none too surprising that you find them persuasive.
Or maybe he just has no desire to have dialogue with an anti-semite outside of calling you out for it.Like an oily politician or a used car salesman — you deflected and dodged extremely simple questions on a foreign country lobbying group from three different posters.
Again, in 2013, two important groups were overwhelmingly against US troops entering the Syrian civil war:
The American people:
Source: https://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/syria-poll-us-military-help-092058
The American military:
Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/09/11/military-syria-poll/2798923/
One group was for the US entering the Syrian civil war:
Source: https://www.haaretz.com/amp/aipac-pushing-hard-for-syria-action-1.5330700
In 2019, US troops are still in Syria. Is it racist to wonder what America’s founding fathers would think of this?
Dine decided that “if you wanted to have influence you had to be a fund-raiser.” Despite its name, AIPAC is not a political-action committee, and therefore cannot contribute to campaigns. But in the eighties, as campaign-finance laws changed and PACs proliferated, AIPAC helped form pro-Israel PACs. By the end of the decade, there were dozens. Most had generic-sounding names, like Heartland Political Action Committee, and they formed a loose constellation around AIPAC. Though there was no formal relationship, in many cases the leader was an AIPAC member, and as the PACs raised funds they looked to the broader organization for direction.They aren’t in the top 100 of federal campaign donors?
Like an oily politician or a used car salesman — you deflected and dodged extremely simple questions
Yeah, I just saw that. Dang. I guess I'll just have to use "Jew hater" from now on.@Medic007 , I'm afraid NZ poke has got you on a technicality. He actually prefers the Hebrew speaking Jews to the English speaking Jews.
You triggered, NPCZ Poke?Using a manufactured buzzword which literally means “anti-people who speak Semitic languages” — isn’t an effective way to stop people from asking completely valid questions.
Since you like using manufactured buzzwords, maybe you should go blog for Huff Post or Vox.
You could find people to to accuse of Islamaphobia or using hate-speech. They might even give you unlimited soy lattes.
@Medic007 , I'm afraid NZ poke has got you on a technicality. He actually prefers the Hebrew speaking Jews to the English speaking Jews.
First and foremost.
NZ Poke has a girlfriend
NZ Poke has a girlfriend
Eva Braun poster is coming off the wall.
New one going up
Are those phallic symbols in the background or missiles pointed at Israel?