ADVERTISEMENT

Freshman Anti-Semitic Democrat Called on the Carpet

What will they do if she tells them to pound sand?

they apologize to her for being harsh

and go to the standard outrage/orange man bad routine




House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler made a passive aggressive statement while condemning Omar’s words, he blamed the Republicans, continuing his insensitivity toward Jewish causes that began with his support of the Iran deal.
 
I don’t believe her but it will placate the twitter hyenas for now.

She isn’t sorry we all agree right?


Omar apologized last month for posting the tweet referenced by Nadler, which read: "Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel. #Gaza #Palestine#Israel." As of Monday afternoon, the messages that caused the most recent furor were still posted on Omar's Twitter page.
 
I don’t believe her but it will placate the twitter hyenas for now.

She isn’t sorry we all agree right?


Omar apologized last month for posting the tweet referenced by Nadler, which read: "Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel. #Gaza #Palestine#Israel." As of Monday afternoon, the messages that caused the most recent furor were still posted on Omar's Twitter page.
Well, it’s been a constant stream of such crap since she was elected. And actually some before.
 
What did you say that isn't true or is even remotely racist. Does any dispute that Israel is buying congressman through campaign contributions. Whether the money is Russian, Saudi, or Israel it should be a felony with a mandatory minimum prison sentence to take one cent from a foreign government. You are supposed to be a U.S. States Representative not a whore selling your goods to foreigners Glad to finally have someone in congress with the guts to speak out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 07pilt
She’ll say something just as idiotic within a month’s time.

I’m no fan of this lady. But were her “idiotic” statements on the foreign lobbying group factually incorrect?

The lobbying group she criticized went “all out” in 2013 (see below) to get American troops involved in the Syrian civil war — a war that American voters wanted no part of.

Six years later, American troops are still “all in” the Syrian civil war. I guess that means the lobbying was successful?

In contrast, in 2016, 62 million American voters successfully elected a president who’s signature campaign item was building a wall — but for some reason the American voters couldn’t get what they wanted. And a lot more Americans wanted the wall (and voted for it) than the Syrian civil war.



43675-E5-D-4690-4865-8764-40-E891-A7-D10-C.jpg


Article: https://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/aipac-syria-096344
 
What did you say that isn't true or is even remotely racist. Does any dispute that Israel is buying congressman through campaign contributions. Whether the money is Russian, Saudi, or Israel it should be a felony with a mandatory minimum prison sentence to take one cent from a foreign government. You are supposed to be a U.S. States Representative not a whore selling your goods to foreigners Glad to finally have someone in congress with the guts to speak out.
Yes, I dispute it.
 
I’m no fan of this lady. But were her “idiotic” statements on the foreign lobbying group factually incorrect?

The lobbying group she criticized went “all out” in 2013 (see below) to get American troops involved in the Syrian civil war — a war that American voters wanted no part of.

Six years later, American troops are still “all in” the Syrian civil war. I guess that means the lobbying was successful?

In contrast, in 2016, 62 million American voters successfully elected a president who’s signature campaign item was building a wall — but for some reason the American voters couldn’t get what they wanted. And a lot more Americans wanted the wall (and voted for it) than the Syrian civil war.



43675-E5-D-4690-4865-8764-40-E891-A7-D10-C.jpg


Article: https://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/aipac-syria-096344
Oh, some of her comments come straight out of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” playbook, so it’s none too surprising that you find them persuasive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
Oh, some of her comments come straight out of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” playbook, so it’s none too surprising that you find them persuasive.

Like an oily politician or a used car salesman — you deflected and dodged extremely simple questions on a foreign country lobbying group from three different posters.


Again, in 2013, two important groups were overwhelmingly against US troops entering the Syrian civil war:


The American people:


26-B5-CA89-7-E48-46-AD-9-FF2-5349365-C16-FC.jpg


54-FDF324-07-E6-4297-811-D-9-CA3-BEB6-D41-C.jpg


Source: https://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/syria-poll-us-military-help-092058




The American military:


5-F283-F93-6-D22-4-F60-B002-78913-A0110-A1.jpg



Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/09/11/military-syria-poll/2798923/



One group was for the US entering the Syrian civil war:


DzQ77hJU8AAWAz0



Source: https://www.haaretz.com/amp/aipac-pushing-hard-for-syria-action-1.5330700



In 2019, US troops are still in Syria. Is it racist to wonder what America’s founding fathers would think of this?
 
Like an oily politician or a used car salesman — you deflected and dodged extremely simple questions on a foreign country lobbying group from three different posters.


Again, in 2013, two important groups were overwhelmingly against US troops entering the Syrian civil war:


The American people:


26-B5-CA89-7-E48-46-AD-9-FF2-5349365-C16-FC.jpg


54-FDF324-07-E6-4297-811-D-9-CA3-BEB6-D41-C.jpg


Source: https://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/syria-poll-us-military-help-092058




The American military:


5-F283-F93-6-D22-4-F60-B002-78913-A0110-A1.jpg



Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/09/11/military-syria-poll/2798923/



One group was for the US entering the Syrian civil war:


DzQ77hJU8AAWAz0



Source: https://www.haaretz.com/amp/aipac-pushing-hard-for-syria-action-1.5330700



In 2019, US troops are still in Syria. Is it racist to wonder what America’s founding fathers would think of this?
Or maybe he just has no desire to have dialogue with an anti-semite outside of calling you out for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
They aren’t in the top 100 of federal campaign donors?
Dine decided that “if you wanted to have influence you had to be a fund-raiser.” Despite its name, AIPAC is not a political-action committee, and therefore cannot contribute to campaigns. But in the eighties, as campaign-finance laws changed and PACs proliferated, AIPAC helped form pro-Israel PACs. By the end of the decade, there were dozens. Most had generic-sounding names, like Heartland Political Action Committee, and they formed a loose constellation around AIPAC. Though there was no formal relationship, in many cases the leader was an AIPAC member, and as the PACs raised funds they looked to the broader organization for direction.

Members’ contributions were often bundled. “AIPAC will select some dentist in Boise, say, to be the bundler,” a former longtime AIPAC member said. “They tell people in New York and other cities to send their five-thousand-dollar checks to him. But AIPAC has to teach people discipline—because all those people who are giving five thousand dollars would ordinarily want recognition. The purpose is to make the dentist into a big shot—he’s the one who has all this money to give to the congressman’s campaign.” AIPAC representatives tried to match each member of Congress with a contact who shared the congressman’s interests. If a member of Congress rode a Harley-Davidson, AIPAC found a contact who did, too. The goal was to develop people who could get a member of Congress on the phone at a moment’s notice.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/09/01/friends-israel
 
In 1996, Brian Baird, a psychologist from Seattle, decided to run for Congress. Local Democrats asked if he had thought about what he was going to say to AIPAC. “I had admired Israel since I was a kid,” Baird told me. “But I also was fairly sympathetic to peaceful resolution and the Palestinian side. These people said, ‘We respect that, but let’s talk about the issues and what you might say.’ The difficult reality is this: in order to get elected to Congress, if you’re not independently wealthy, you have to raise a lot of money. And you learn pretty quickly that, if AIPAC is on your side, you can do that. They come to you and say, ‘We’d be happy to host ten-thousand-dollar fund-raisers for you, and let us help write your annual letter, and please come to this multi-thousand-person dinner.’ ” Baird continued, “Any member of Congress knows that AIPAC is associated indirectly with significant amounts of campaign spending if you’re with them, and significant amounts against you if you’re not with them.” For Baird, AIPAC-connected money amounted to about two hundred thousand dollars in each of his races—“and that’s two hundred thousand going your way, versus the other way: a four-hundred-thousand-dollar swing.”
 
AIPAC is prideful about its influence. Its promotional literature points out that a reception during its annual policy conference, in Washington, “will be attended by more members of Congress than almost any other event, except for a joint session of Congress or a State of the Union address.” A former AIPAC executive, Steven Rosen, was fond of telling people that he could take out a napkin at any Senate hangout and get signatures of support for one issue or another from scores of senators. AIPAC has more than a hundred thousand members, a network of seventeen regional offices, and a vast pool of donors. The lobby does not raise funds directly. Its members do, and the amount of money they channel to political candidates is difficult to track. But everybody in Congress recognizes its influence in elections, and the effect is evident. In 2011, when the Palestinians announced that they would petition the U.N. for statehood, AIPAC helped persuade four hundred and forty-six members of Congress to co-sponsor resolutions opposing the idea.
 
Like an oily politician or a used car salesman — you deflected and dodged extremely simple questions

@NZ Poke How many unanswered questions have you left hanging when you drop your never ending tweets and screen caps and then selectively reply? You have no ground to criticize anybody else's lack of response on this board, you are little more than the bizzaro version of the NPC meme you were fed a few months back.
 
Using a manufactured buzzword which literally means “anti-people who speak Semitic languages” — isn’t an effective way to stop people from asking completely valid questions.

Since you like using manufactured buzzwords, maybe you should go blog for Huff Post or Vox.

You could find people to to accuse of Islamaphobia or using hate-speech. They might even give you unlimited soy lattes.


A96-C179-C-C921-449-B-8125-48-F7-D30-BC98-C.png
You triggered, NPCZ Poke?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
FM, agree that none of the whores should take money from a foreign government or foreign government backed lobbying group. Even go one further, outside money shouldn't even be allowed in local election for national offices. For example some liberal Hollywood puke bag, should not be able to donate to Beto in Texas and there are many examples going on with both sides.

The whores in congress and bought and paid for like thrice cut crack on skid row. It really shouldn't be a puzzle as to how most of those low life's show up near paupers and leave millionaires many times over on salaries of what $170K a year? With some then moving on to lobby for the foreign governments that lined their pockets with contributions.

Lastly, there will be no way we end up in another meaningless war in the middle east. Help Israel keep modern weaponry, get any and all Christians, Jews and outside the norm Muslim sect members out that want out and let the rest kill each other off...Allah Akbar!
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT