ADVERTISEMENT

Donald Trump faces new rape allegation.

His defender are 36% and falling. His goodwill capital is gone with those that matter the middle 20%.

I know it is hard for you to conceive, but DJT will be re-elected. The lineup of Democratic candidates is incredibly weak. The middle 20% will not vote for another candidate that promises "hope and change" when the change will radically alter the political landscape of this country. The Democrats are still several election cycles away from being able to turn America into a socialist paradise.

These charges by this lady do nothing but add to the white noise. The Democrats, MSM, celebrity denouncements, education sector have overplayed their hand. Fresh charges every day, uninhibited outrage at his every utterance have caused too many of the 20% of which you speak to turn it off. They simply don't listen to it any longer.

None of which changes the fact that anyone who pays the slightest attention cannot hear these charges and not think to themselves they could see it being true. That's what a slovenly boor the man has shown himself to be.
 
Last edited:
I know it is hard for you to conceive, but DJT will be re-elected. The lineup of Democratic candidates is incredibly weak. The middle 20% will not vote for another candidate that promises "hope and change" when the change will radically alter the political landscape of this country. The Democrats are still several election cycles away from being able to turn America into a socialist paradise.

These charges by this lady do nothing but add to the white noise. The Democrats, MSM, celebrity denouncements, education sector have overplayed their hand. Fresh charges every day, uninhibited outrage at his every utterance have caused too many of the 20% of which you speak to turn it off. They simply don't listen to it any longer.

None of which changes the fact that anyone who pays the slightest attention cannot hear these charges and think to themselves they could see it being true. That's what a slovenly boor the man has shown himself to be.
Oh boy. Enjoy your dwindling twilight years.
 
Whataboutisim isn’t going to make What Daddy Donald did ok, 67.


It's not a whataboutism in this instance, it's pointing out the hypocrisy of liberals.
Maybe Congressional Democrats can start an investigation and have this women come testify in a public hearing, that would make for great Democrat political theater. Hell get old Balsey Ford to collaborate her story that would be even better.
 
It's not a whataboutism in this instance, it's pointing out the hypocrisy of liberals.
Maybe Congressional Democrats can start an investigation and have this women come testify in a public hearing, that would make for great Democrat political theater. Hell get old Balsey Ford to collaborate her story that would be even better.
Sure
 
So who's charging him with a crime, then the trial, let's see the outcome of all that. Then I'll happily condemn him if he's actually convicted. In America you see, you are innocent until proven guilty. It's kind of a novel concept.
 
So who's charging him with a crime, then the trial, let's see the outcome of all that. Then I'll happily condemn him if he's actually convicted. In America you see, you are innocent until proven guilty. It's kind of a novel concept.
Maybe we can keep Trump in a detention center until he is proven guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ponca Dan
Whataboutisim isn’t going to make What Daddy Donald did ok, 67.

Not whataboutism its to show how the left are a bunch of hypocrites. Daddy Bill could have raped your Mom in front of you and when the Police questioned you about it you would say she is a lying bitch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
Nothing on Drudge. One would think that if this was credible there would be at least one line on Drudge about it. Maybe, the MSM hasn't recovered from having their poop chutes packed from their Kavanaugh escapades and don't want a packing repeat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22LR and iasooner1
Nothing on Drudge. One would think that if this was credible there would be at least one line on Drudge about it. Maybe, the MSM hasn't recovered from having their poop chutes packed from their Kavanaugh escapades and don't want a packing repeat.
lol
 
So who's charging him with a crime, then the trial, let's see the outcome of all that. Then I'll happily condemn him if he's actually convicted. In America you see, you are innocent until proven guilty. It's kind of a novel concept.
The court of public opinion is bound by no laws.
 
Donald Trump is one of six men who assaulted her.

Twenty years later and Trump being the most famous person on the planet and we are just now hearing of this. These lefty women or f'ng batshit crazy or crazy with TDS.

And the pile on begins.

Keep in mind, if this was Bill Clinton, Headhunter would absolutely believe this woman. He would have been calling (or did call) for Bill Clinton's impeachment.

But this is Trump, and so Headhunter MUST defend Trump at all costs
 
Dn7tC9nWsAAC5ss.jpg

And the first post that deflects towards Clinton.

What this poster forgets is how outraged he (or at least, how shocked he acted) was back when Clinton was President.. Now? No outrage.

Just defend Trump, at all costs.

Hypocrisy.
 
And the pile on begins.

Keep in mind, if this was Bill Clinton, Headhunter would absolutely believe this woman. He would have been calling (or did call) for Bill Clinton's impeachment.

But this is Trump, and so Headhunter MUST defend Trump at all costs
Nope. You are just wrong here. If someone came out today saying that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted them 35 years ago I'd be defending him too. There's a statute of limitations for a reason. There's a statute of limitations on just how long someone gets to wait before smearing them with an allegation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
Nope. You are just wrong here. If someone came out today saying that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted them 35 years ago I'd be defending him too. There's a statute of limitations for a reason. There's a statute of limitations on just how long someone gets to wait before smearing them with an allegation.

You are full of s*** and you know it.

A statute of limitations has nothing to do with whether or not she is telling the truth. Clearly, she didn't press charges and clearly he can't be charged today. But that has nothing to do with whether or not it ACTUALLY happened.

You are in full defense mode of Trump. If this was Clinton or Obama, you wouldn't be.They would be the scum you believe them to be. It is all politics to you. At least be honest.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pokeabear
You are full of s*** and you know it.

A statute of limitations has nothing to do with whether or not she is telling the truth. Clearly, she didn't press charges and clearly he can't be charged today. But that has nothing to do with whether or not it ACTUALLY happened.

You are in full defense mode of Trump. If this was Clinton or Obama, you wouldn't be.They would be scum you belive them to be. It is all politics to you. At least be honest.
And now you are a mind reader. Got it. Pretty good super power if you can get it.

There is a legal statute of limitations. Then there's a reasonable person's statute of limitations. Both are long since past.
 
You all be good. The authority on perfect morality is here. @my_2cents

I'm not an authority on anything.

I don't know if this woman is telling the truth or not. I will respect her enough though to listen to what she has to say without calling her a whore. I also will consider how what she says does seem to fit a pattern when it comes to what other women have to say about Trump. Or even what Trump himself says, you know, "grab them by the ......"

What I won't do is simply close my eyes to something I use to be outraged about simply because it is happening to a politician who has an (R) beside his name instead of a (D).
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT