Whoever has said only blacks taking the government handouts? Pretty damn racist of you IYAM. I don't understand why you liberal's have to make everything about race.
Debt to top World War II peak within 20 years
- Thread starter Bitter Creek
- Start date
Whoever has said only blacks taking the government handouts? Pretty damn racist of you IYAM. I don't understand why you liberal's have to make everything about race.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/elections/
Maybe not a slam dunk? FYI, the Presidential election is state by state. And Quinnipiac is one of the best polling organizations, particularly on state polls.
- Polls
- Election 2016
- Video
- Writers
- More
Quick Poll/Map Links
Advanced Search
Find Any Poll
Latest Election Polls
3.8k Shares
Election Polls | President Polls | State Polls | Senate Polls | House Polls | Governor Polls | Approval Polls
Wednesday, July 13
Race/Topic (Click to Sort) Poll Results Spread
Pennsylvania: Trump vs. Clinton Quinnipiac Clinton 41, Trump 43 Trump +2
Ohio: Trump vs. Clinton Quinnipiac Clinton 41, Trump 41 Tie
Florida: Trump vs. Clinton Quinnipiac Trump 42, Clinton 39 Trump +3
Pennsylvania: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Quinnipiac Trump 40, Clinton 34, Johnson 9, Stein 3 Trump +6
Ohio: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Quinnipiac Trump 37, Clinton 36, Johnson 7, Stein 6 Trump +1
Florida: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Quinnipiac Trump 41, Clinton 36, Johnson 7, Stein 4 Trump +5
No, but again, that 5%+ growth occurred while debt was at all time levels.
Meh, according to this..IF true (still), I think we are in better shape than one would assume...
For every 1 US$ of debt, we are owed .89 US$
For every 1 US$ of debt, we are owed .89 US$
Last edited:
When debt maintenance becomes sufficiently onerous as to adversely affect the products and services provided by "free" cash flow. My guess.
Are you of the belief that if we roughly expand debt financing to a comparable historical percentage, that we would experience similar levels of growth? Do you anticipate any downstream consequences?
If you don't think the gov't is also lining their pockets you need to get your head out of the sand.
He went to the ER for gout? He deserves his $2,600 bill. The ER is for actual sick people.
It's people like this dipshit that are the reason for high medical expenses for the rest of us.
As the name should imply, the "Emergency Room" is for emergencies. If it were for convenience, it would be called the Convenience Room. If it were for shit your family practice doc should be seeing, it would be called the Family Practice Room.
So about the debt. It sounds like I should prep for unprecedented good economic times and vote for more free stuff to drive up the debt.
Is that right?
Is that right?
he's been out of work because of intense pain in his legs. He decided to go see what was going on.
"Deciding to go see what was going on" still doesn't warrant a visit to the ER.
To the ER??
There has to be more to the story. I'm not buying it.
Pilt here you go. Convince us that infinity debt is no big deal. I love that bed time story.
On a side note:Clinton you suck
Sounds like a law suit waiting to happen. Bet syssy would take this pro boner.
I am not saying debt = growth, but I am saying that empirically debt at those levels doesn't lead to economic disaster.
I bet he also called 911 and requested an ambulance take him since all arriving by ambulance go to the head of the line.
It is all just paper. The real resources are still there. Paper is just how it gets allocated.
The debt levels were able to be reduced due to higher levels of economic growth, along with lesser commitments for entitlements in that period.
What we see now are projections for ever increasing debt levels, currently greater commitments for entitlements and promises of still more to come form at least one Presidential candidate, coupled with stagnating population growth and 2% growth projections.
Last edited:
Have you ever read Trump's tax plan? It's a disaster, and it's been heavily criticized by everyone including republicans and economists.
Have you? Please highlight the parts that you think are just terrible?
Clinton,
You really need to tone it down several notches. You're going off the rails unprovoked in the name calling etc.
You really need to tone it down several notches. You're going off the rails unprovoked in the name calling etc.
And what I am saying is that all of that debt didn't prevent growth or really cause any problems at all. If you want people to panic about the debt, saying that "in twenty years it will reach an arbitrary level that hasn't been associated with negative outcomes," isn't the best tact.
If growth stays at 2% then the interest rate projections from the CBO (publisher of this report) will be laughably wrong. Go look at the interest rates projected for 2016 in the 2010 report for a good illustration of the CBO's track record.
CBO projects entitlements to go from 13.2% of GDP to 16.9% over the next 30 years, I think we will manage.
No income tax whatsoever from single income under 25,000 and dual income under 50,000? Lowering business income tax to no more than 15 percent?
It makes no sense, the revenues would plummet and ensure our future plight.
