Man you are predictable. Too bad your list of go-to things to dredge up about me that you claim I was wrong about is so tiny. Still, happy to rub your nose in shit a little longer.
Duly noted and bronzed. I've given my prediction about this (senate immunity) for a year at least but what would the board be without you hammering fictional narratives?
Call them narratives if you like. I'll put my track record against yours any day of the week.
Do you still on the Seth Rich train? I can't keep up with em' all...
Ahh... good ol Seth Rich. That's one of my favorite things you go to because not only has his case never been solved, no theory about him being the hacker has ever been debunked. And I've never lived on that train - only allowed for the possibility that the "Russia hack" evidence was fabricated. Do you even have two brain cells that vibrate when you consider the many implications of the Ukranian corruption, Crowdstrike etc. and how they all tie together - and what that may eventually imply about the DNC hacking and who did it? Nah probably not.
Yes, I still consider it one of several possibilities.
Any Huber convictions yet?
Convictions? Shouldn't he reveal his indictments first? I hear pretty soon he will at least reveal his findings, which likely predate the indictments. Sadly, convictions are a ways off.
Nope. But as an attorney, you should know that grand juries' indictment rates are about 98–99%. When McCabe is ripe, he'll be indicted. To suggest there is no case because he's not been indicted yet is clumsy propaganda.
Not yet. Believe me, I'll keep you informed. His business partner was
recently acquitted. That should give you pause. Hilarious though, that as long as the Flynn
sentencing has taken, you have the temerity to throw that in
after asking me about "Huber convictions." Pretty sure Huber was assigned to his investigation after Barr's appointment, which was probably at least a year or two after we were first supposed to see Flynn in jail according to you guys.
Not your strongest work here man.
