ADVERTISEMENT

back on topic fisa/coup

What do you wanna bet absolutely no one gets convicted of treason?

What do you wanna bet absolutely no one even gets charged with treason?

Within friendly and gentlemanly bounds of course.

what do you want to bet this 40M russia thing was nothing more than weaponized government attempting to subvert the presidency?
 
what do you want to bet this 40M russia thing was nothing more than weaponized government attempting to subvert the presidency?

I wanna bet on something subject to objective verification rather than subjective interpretation and opinion of intent.

So that's nothing you wanna bet on convictions or charges?

Within gentlemanly and friendly bounds of course?

Did I read your response correctly?

It's certainly cool if you don't. Not taking any inferences from such a declination at all.
 
"I think spying did occur," Barr said. "But the question is whether it was adequately predicated and I'm not suggesting it wasn't adequately predicated, but I need to explore that."
 
I wanna bet on something subject to objective verification rather than subjective interpretation and opinion of intent.

So that's nothing you wanna bet on convictions or charges?

Within gentlemanly and friendly bounds of course?

Did I read your response correctly?

It's certainly cool if you don't. Not taking any inferences from such a declination at all.

i can certainly appreciate the gentlemanly nature of your wager

and the finite objective verification of said wager

based on a system that

1. charges mike flynn with lying
2. dismisses andy mccabe for lack of candor


i hope you can reasonably accept
i’d be a fool to enter in such agreement
with the deck stacked against me
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
i can certainly appreciate the gentlemanly nature of your wager

and the finite objective verification of said wager

based on a system that

1. charges mike flynn with lying
2. dismisses andy mccabe for lack of candor


i hope you can reasonably accept
i’d be a fool to enter in such agreement
with the deck stacked against me

Sure. I said no inferences would be drawn from a declination. I meant that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rdcldad
They're not my rats. In fact, in this very thread I've said there may justifiably be criminal charges. Rack'em up, I say.

You're just trying to label anyone that doesn't suffer from Trump Deification syndrome like yourself as a looney leftist.

I will save the thread loon.

I'd be upset too if my heroes let me down and my favorite media outlets lied to me for two years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
I'd be upset too if my heroes let me down and my favorite media outlets lied to me for two years.

You really are just a moron with no idea of what I have said about MSM and the players in this whole fiasco before you showed up with a bad case of Type Two TDS.

It's all good.
 
Of course they did. When have you ever seen government give up power?
The end of prohibition.

Theoretically though FISA is an executive branch power not a general government power, and congress should be eager to check it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
Congress should be eager to do a lot of things but they are to worried about their own personal power.
 
The end of prohibition.
Ending prohibition was the government giving up power? The history books seem to indicate that the end of prohibition was the government taking power back. Prohibition did nothing but cost the government tax revenue. Nobody actually stopped drinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
Ending prohibition was the government giving up power? The history books seem to indicate that the end of prohibition was the government taking power back. Prohibition did nothing but cost the government tax revenue. Nobody actually stopped drinking.
awesome
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT